Can IDF relight Intel's fire?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
2K6 has problem detecting actual FSB. I am sure the FX 60 is not running overclocked with a sub 200 FSB.

Fake benchmarks or images are removed from XS, we dont rely on people with your uber spotting skills to determine whats legit as you are a fricken idiot.

FX 60 overclocked on vapo and you think the FSB is sub 200. ROFL

You are one pathetic waste of bandwidth. Good job debunking the scores posted. You will continue to get bitch slapped as you post moronic replies to stuff you are clueless about.
 
2K6 has problem detecting actual FSB. I am sure the FX 60 is not running overclocked with a sub 200 FSB.

Fake benchmarks or images are removed from XS, we dont rely on people with your uber spotting skills to determine whats legit as you are a fricken idiot.

FX 60 overclocked on vapo and you think the FSB is sub 200. ROFL

You are one pathetic waste of bandwidth. Good job debunking the scores posted. You will continue to get bitch slapped as you post moronic replies to stuff you are clueless about.
Click to expand...

LOL @ U!!!! YOU ARE TRULY THE FUNNIEST TROLL ON THESE FORUMZ!! YOU DESERVE 2 POINTS FOR THAT!!!! HAAHAHA!!

FUGGER: 8
sepheronx: 2
CompGeek: 4
Ycon: 1
Apache_Lives: 4
ak47is1337: 3

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
 
I agree. As i've stated before, we just won't know the true answers till the next gens come out. No matter what processor brand we believe in, we should always be optimistic about new launches. Bashing something that is not yet released, is a waste of time and energy. Especially if the thing that everybody is bashing comes out swinging and kicks ass, it'll make those look like idiots in the long run.
 
I did not expect reply worthy of the bandwidth wasted from you.

You are about the stupidest AMD fanboy THGF has to offer.

Keep burning the member base, you are doing a great job.
 
I did not expect reply worthy of the bandwidth wasted from you.

You are about the stupidest AMD fanboy THGF has to offer.

Keep burning the member base, you are doing a great job.
Click to expand...

Hey, FUGGER, I'd like to see a website that proves "2k6 has detection problems", because otherwise, it's just another one of your made up lines you post.

BTW: I don't want another post with crap like "waaah waaah im crying because I don't have to post a link cuz ur a stupid head! waah im gonna go cry and eat a popscle waaaaahhh ;("

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
 
Dont be all upset dude. You cheered for the underdog, and they had a good run there. You got to look "cool" being a dick and blindly waving that banner with the green arrow thing on it. Just keep those happy thoughts in the back of your mind to cherish forever as Core eats the Athlon's face off.


Maybe if you quiet down a little, nobody will notice that youve jumped ship to the other bandwagon like a rat from a sinking boat once reality sets in.

Eddie was so awesome, he was alot of fun to watch. I miss him alot =(
 
Edit - sorrydidn't see the last post.

Oh, cheak this out. The real thing.
http://anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2713&p=2
E6700 Conroe stock Killing a FX60 at 2.8 ghz!!!
Conroe Rules, Conroe rules, yah baby.
While we're still comparing to Socket-939 and only using RD480, it does seem very unlikely that AMD would be able to make up this much of a deficit with Socket-AM2 and RD580. Especially looking at titles like F.E.A.R. where Conroe's performance advantage averages over 40%, it looks like Intel's confidence has been well placed.

Also keep in mind that we are over six months away from the actual launch of Conroe, performance can go up from where it is today. We also only looked at the 2.66GHz part, the Extreme Edition version of Conroe will most likely be clocked around 3.0GHz which will extend the performance advantage even further.

AMD still does have some time to surprise us with AM2, but from what we've seen today, they are going to have to do a lot of work to close this gap. We saw performance today in the two areas that we were most concerned about with Conroe: gaming and media encoding, and in both Intel greatly exceeded our expectations. Also remember that Conroe should be lower power than the AMD offering we compared it to, although we weren't able to measure power consumption at the wall in our brief time with the systems.
Click to expand...
 
Can IDF relight Intel's fire ? Yeah sure it can but anybody got a torch for Intel ? I fear they've been in the dark for too long .
Oh wait , maybe one of their dual core electric ovens ... errr I mean P$ ... P4 .. would do just fine to warm things up a bit :lol: .
Oh how I love bashing Intel but M$ is my favourite though , nothing even come close to it . :lol:
Seriously now , we shall have to wait and see . Anyone got any of those new Intel chips ? No ? thought so . We'll talk when they're actually available in quantity .
 
Can IDF relight Intel's fire ? Yeah sure it can but anybody got a torch for Intel ? I fear they've been in the dark for too long .
Oh wait , maybe one of their dual core electric ovens ... errr I mean P$ ... P4 .. would do just fine to warm things up a bit :lol: .
Oh how I love bashing Intel but M$ is my favourite though , nothing even come close to it . :lol:
Seriously now , we shall have to wait and see . Anyone got any of those new Intel chips ? No ? thought so . We'll talk when they're actually available in quantity .
Click to expand...
wake up, the end is near.
 
The preverbial fat lady is singing at the top of her lungs and we can all hear her loud and clear.

Game Over! AMD FX-60 failed, AMD goes back to the drawing board for five years of rebuild.

Mike test it yourself, no one is gonna spoon feed your dumb ass info now.
 
Actually AMD has gone back to the drawing board an will release a new architecture in 2007-2008 . After all I'll admit that A64 and AM2 are nothing more than a fancy Athlon from the good olds day so it's a surprise that they lasted as long as they did .
Glad to see Intel brought the old P3 which it now calls Conroe into the fight :lol: .
 
http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2713
Conoe! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe!Conroe! Conroe!
Come on everybody! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! Where did Mike go?! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! He's still reading the article @ Anandtech going "Oh NO! Oh NO! Oh NOOOOO! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! AMD fanboys now! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe! Conroe!!! :lol: :lol:
Click to expand...

That's just sick man . I'm not against sexual minorities but I think you're first one to fall in love with a CPU . Why don't you have Intel send you some pre-production Conroe so you can just stick it in your ......... socket . :lol:
 
I was afraid of this . Unless there's a nice babe that I don't know of named Conroe it seems you've actually fallen for a CPU .
Oh well at least you've still got 6 months until your sweet Conroes comes out so maybe you can reconsider :wink: .
 
Anticipation, it's killing me. :) Hell, I was bumming out that Conroe will probably not be compatible with my mobo but if it's as good as the article implies, time for a whole new rig! :wink:
Edit: It depends how many arms & legs they're gonna want for the goods whether I upgrade ASAP.
 
Nope but I'm too tired and I'm going to bed . I think after all this I'll be dreaming silicon tonight . I just hope it's the right kind of silicon , not CPUs . :lol: :lol: .
Night all !
 
Core Extreme Edition Series - 1333MHz FSB, EM64T, EIST, VT, SSE4
Core Extreme Edition - 3.33GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 32+32KB L1, 4MB L2, Dual Core, TDP 95W - $___ - Q4
Core E6000 Series - 1066MHz FSB, EM64T, EIST, VT, SSE4
Core E6800 - 2.93GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 32+32KB L1, 4MB L2, Dual Core, TDP 65W - $___ - Q4
Core E6700 - 2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 32+32KB L1, 4MB L2, Dual Core, TDP 65W - $529 - Q3
Core E6600 - 2.40GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 32+32KB L1, 4MB L2, Dual Core, TDP 65W - $315 - Q3
Core E6400 - 2.13GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 32+32KB L1, 2MB L2, Dual Core, TDP 65W - $240 - Q3
Core E6300 - 1.86GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 32+32KB L1, 2MB L2, Dual Core, TDP 65W - $210 - Q3
Core E4000 Series - 800MHz FSB, EM64T, EIST, SSE4
Core E4200 - 1.6GHz, 800MHz FSB, 32+32KB L1, 2MB L2, Dual Core, TDP 65W - $___ - Q3

It seems the SSE4 part is wrong. Thay have reworked SSE that performs much better per clock. All software with SSE will fly!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom