akamateau :
Both of China's Supercomputers were in design by 2015 and the silicon was certainly being taped out by then.
Whether or not it was in development is separate from the question of whether it was planned to be used for this machine.
akamateau :
Since both of China's two top Supercomputers were on-line by November 2017 it is IMPOSSIBLE that China completely switched gears, created a new processor, boards and assembled 40,000+ processors ALL in 18 months. The assembly ALONE would have taken a year!!
So, you're saying the embargo wasn't targeted at a specific project, but just in anticipation of one?
And I don't know why those numbers are supposed to be relevant. If we're talking production volumes of desktop CPUs or motherboards, those are entirely unremarkable.
akamateau :
It did not delay any plans to bring a second machine on-line as they were both on-line by November 2017. THEY WERE ALREADY IN THE PIPELINE WHEN PRESIDENT OBAMA EMBARGOED INTEL, AMD and nVidia.
Is this "supposition", or do you have good sources on this?
akamateau :
President Eisenhower made an excellent point to the National Security Council back in the 50's... 'We should sell the Russians anything they can't shoot back."
He probably didn't even imagine cyberwarfare.
akamateau :
Your analysis is all supposition. Stick with facts and leave the geopolitical analysis to those who actually know what they are talking about. You have absolutely NO CLUE what the message being sent to China was you just THINK you know.
As @SkyBill40 said, if you want us to weight your statements beyond speculation and conjecture, then give us credentials or sources.
I have no better sources than what I've read on nextplatform, wikipedia, and what Paul just cited, above. I'm pretty sure I read something on nextplatform about their shift to sourcing domestic silicon after the embargo hit. They talked about a couple different candidates that were considered, as well as some background of the Sunway SW26010 that was selected. I'll post the link if I find it.