It seems like the loongson cpu is using a short pipeline to yield similar IPC to AMD and Intel’s 14+ stage pipeline.
It could be, but we can't say for sure.
Clockspeeds aren't just a function of architecture, but the capability of the circuit designers and layout engineers in the team.
The IPC of leading x86 CPUs is partly being held back by the ISA. I'm eager to see how the upcoming ARM cores from Qualcomm, AMD, Nvidia and others will compare.
The 90's called, they want their claims back.
Modern CPUs with billions of transistors aren't limited by the decoders anymore. That has been long past when engineers had transistor budgets measuring in the hundreds of thousands range.
Simple reason ARM vendors are leading is because both AMD/Intel has fallen completely flat on it's face over the years. You can tell by the comparison between AMD/Nvidia. The latter had far, far less missteps.
DEC in the 90's led everyone else despite having the same RISC instruction set. Then the team of DEC went to eventually work at Apple through acquisition of PA Semi. Along with them they had other brilliant engineers like Gerald Williams III, who moved on to find Nuvia, and breaking records again. As soon as Gerald left Apple, we had 4 generations of minimal gains from Apple chips.
Because we're outsiders it's very easy to fall into the trap the often clueless high level management with finance degrees fall into - the belief that it's the "tech" that makes the difference, when it's the ingenuity, perseverance, and creativity of the people that do.
The no-clues talked about the complexity of Sapphire Rapids as being the reason for downfall, when people in the know told for years how the management team led by Kraznich fired the ENTIRE SPR validation team at some point. That couldn't have had anything to do with SPR being delayed for 3+ years can't it?