Archived from groups: alt.games.civ3 (
More info?)
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:18:23 +0000, Daran <daranSPAMg@lineone.net> wrote:
> Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:19:34 -0500, The Stare
>> <wat1@not.likely.frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Daran" <daranSPAMg@lineone.net> wrote in message
>>> news:ha2mc2-tl2.ln1@wheresmeshirt.clara.net...
>>>> Jaymee <jaymee@redknapp.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Everyone keeps posting about what they would like to see or change in
>>>>> Civ 4.... but what would you want to KEEP from Civ 3???
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daran
>>>
>>> That's what i call a concise answer ;-)
>>
>> It was certainly short, but I'm not sure it was "to the point".
>
> I suppose it could be construed as implying that I don't want anything
> retained from Civ 3, but in fact it was posted accidently. I was just
> reading the article, that's all.
I wasn't sure if you had made a mistake or were being clever. Figured
the latter, actually.
> I don't know how to answer they question. It's easy to identify things I
> don't like, and say that they should be changed. It's also easy to idenfify
> features I like, but the problem is, I have no idea what other things will
> have changed which may mean that the feature I like no longer works as well,
> or even makes any sense at all.
See, that's the thing; without knowing how the internal interactions work,
it's hard to know which cards we can remove, and which ones are holding the
rest of the house up.