I can vouch for logainofhades' build he curated; it's a solid build for the budget in my opinion whilst also including Windows 7. The build is relying on integrated graphics however, if you save up funds you're willing to spend on your system in the future, you can always install a dedicated/discrete GPU; as the motherboard supports the standard PCI-Express x16.
To be honest however, if you're not gaming you don't necessarily need a GPU. Before installing a GPU into my current machine, for 2 years I was able to conduct all my tasks way better than my previous Pentium 4 machine. I mainly used my computer for university work/office, Adobe Photoshop, programming in various languages such as vB.net, Java along with other tasks, even emulating Android Virtual Machine all with integrated graphics. The integrated graphics of my Intel Pentium Dual-Core beats my GeForce 6800 without doubts (although benchmarks seem to state otherwise).
😀
So you may not necessarily need to install a GPU at all if you're not planning to play any games. The motherboard logainofhades includes does indeed also support i3, i5, i7 and Xeon E3 processors. So the upgrade path is open and sure does beat AMD.
For the budget I believe it's a strong build, and if you're willing to exceed your budget you could purchase the Spec-01 case you desire.
zeyuanfu :
There are several things, though.
1, I am on a VERY low budget for this and a LOT of the upcoming years, and I would LOVE An Intel Core i7, that's for sure, but it costs about 300-350$ each. I know I could get an i5 or even an i3, but they have some not really good graphics and I can't buy a GPU until next year.
Apologies to hear you're on a tight budget, unfortunately we're not all fortunate enough to have funds to splash around.
🙁
Intel i7's are no doubt but high-end CPUs, unless it's a mobile i7 it'll usually perform on par with desktop i5's or in certain cases, even weaker. They do leave a hole in your wallet however. In most cases, I believe the performance levels of an i5 would satisfy most users, where the i7 may not provide a major boost in performance for the average user's requirements.
If you're planning to save up and install a dedicated GPU in the future, I would sacrifice on the integrated graphics for now. I wouldn't shop for Intel CPU's considering their integrated graphics, after all I was able to get by with Sandy Bridge Pentium G Intel HD graphics. You may not even notice a difference between the Intel HD graphics anyhow, from opinion.
zeyuanfu :
The CPUs all get outdated, eventually. There'll be some 5th, 6th gen CPUs after some time, and when I'll upgrade the computer, people will say that the 4th gen CPUs are obsolete and stuff like that, while AMD will keep rolling out FM2+ socket APUs (I hope!).
You're correct. Everything has a lifespan and processors are no exception to that rule. Depending on how long we're talking, even in 2016 when we're on 7th gen, the 4th generation processors would be dated but they won't be "obsolete" in the sense that they're worthless. I bet 4th gen would still have a lot of kick to it, especially the i7's. Processor developments have slowed down if you look back over the past decade, we had Hyper Threading (HT), dual-core, quad-core and even quad-core with HT. Whereas AMD went with six cores.
A 4th gen, heck most likely 2nd and 3rd gen i7's would still be solid in 2016. Sure they may not be the utmost high-end, but again for most consumers, I believe it's more than satisfactory.
All the best.
