G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000 with
my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

"jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>with
> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400

Using PC4000 in your motherboard would be pointless. Your motherboard can
only use it at PC2400 speed. There is no reason to buy any RAM faster than
PC2400 for your motherboard.

Bobby
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

If the module has the same edge structure and keying, the memory can likely
be used. BUT, you will gain nothing by using the more expensive RAM as your
M/B is not designed to utilize the extra speed of this newer RAM.

--
Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User

Quote from: George Ankner
"If you knew as much as you thought you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"

"jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>with
> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
 

Alias

Distinguished
Apr 3, 2004
790
0
18,980
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

"jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>with
> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400

And you have to ask? You can only use 2100 and 2400 obviously.

Alias
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.

I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it supports
on many systems.

I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB , regardless of
speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest flavor of the day.

Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will pobably be
all set to transfer this ram to the new system.

I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and you may
need faster/diffrent RAM.

But isn't possibly, better than not at all?

And of course the RAM might not work.

But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if need be.

So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.

--
Manny Borges
MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
MCT, Certified Cheese Master

The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
-- Marty Feldman
"jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>with
> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Manny Borges wrote:
>
> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.

Then ask for a refund if you are not happy with the answers.

> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.

But what if your system is designed for the slower ram?





--
http://www.bootdisk.com/
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

sorry if my post created some arguments, i have emailed ASUS technical
support last 2 weeks and i haven't received any reply that is why i post it
here.

my purpose in buying a faster DDR was in case i want to upgrade my MB and
processor, i dont have to buy a new RAM.

i have tried it with my old PC, PII with PC100 SDR, and it worked, i am not
sure if it will worked again with DDR.

anyway thanks for all the replies....

"Manny Borges" wrote:

> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>
> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it supports
> on many systems.
>
> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB , regardless of
> speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest flavor of the day.
>
> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will pobably be
> all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>
> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and you may
> need faster/diffrent RAM.
>
> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>
> And of course the RAM might not work.
>
> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if need be.
>
> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>
> --
> Manny Borges
> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>
> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
> -- Marty Feldman
> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
> >I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
> >with
> > my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

jercs wrote:
> I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000 with
> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400


If you've already found the answer in your motherboard's manual, why
are you asking the question here?


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Sometimes, you can get away with that.
Every system is different, I have seen it work, but I have also seen it kill
the RAM.
I currently have PC3200 in my system which calls for PC2700 and it works.
I do see in the specs that PC4000 wants 2.8V, PC3200 2.6V and PC2100/2700
calls for 2.5V.
If you can change the settings in BIOS, it just might work properly.
If you make the decision to use RAM not specified by the MB maker or the RAM
provider; you may end up with unuseable RAM.
OTOH, you might get lucky.

--
A Professional Amateur...If anyone knew it all, none of would be here!
"Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OsT1c1KtFHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>
> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
> supports on many systems.
>
> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB , regardless of
> speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest flavor of the day.
>
> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will pobably
> be all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>
> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and you
> may need faster/diffrent RAM.
>
> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>
> And of course the RAM might not work.
>
> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if need
> be.
>
> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>
> --
> Manny Borges
> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>
> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
> -- Marty Feldman
> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>>with
>> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Be specific. Which answers are rude, short sighted and inaccurate. I see
none posted. Everyone of the posts gave the O/P the correct answer!

--
Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User

Quote from: George Ankner
"If you knew as much as you thought you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"

"Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OsT1c1KtFHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>
> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
> supports on many systems.
>
> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB , regardless of
> speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest flavor of the day.
>
> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will pobably
> be all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>
> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and you
> may need faster/diffrent RAM.
>
> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>
> And of course the RAM might not work.
>
> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if need
> be.
>
> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>
> --
> Manny Borges
> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>
> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
> -- Marty Feldman
> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>>with
>> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>
>
 

Alias

Distinguished
Apr 3, 2004
790
0
18,980
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

But not the answer he wanted ...

Alias

"Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote

> Be specific. Which answers are rude, short sighted and inaccurate. I see
> none posted. Everyone of the posts gave the O/P the correct answer!
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Richard Urban
> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>
> Quote from: George Ankner
> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>
> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OsT1c1KtFHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>>
>> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
>> supports on many systems.
>>
>> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB , regardless
>> of speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest flavor of the
>> day.
>>
>> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
>> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will pobably
>> be all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>>
>> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and you
>> may need faster/diffrent RAM.
>>
>> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>>
>> And of course the RAM might not work.
>>
>> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if need
>> be.
>>
>> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>>
>> --
>> Manny Borges
>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>
>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>> with.
>> -- Marty Feldman
>> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>>>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>>>with
>>> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>>
>>
>
>
 

Alias

Distinguished
Apr 3, 2004
790
0
18,980
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Go to www.crucial.com and take their memory test. It will tell you what RAM
you can use with that board and the CPU you have installed.

Alias

"jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote

> sorry if my post created some arguments, i have emailed ASUS technical
> support last 2 weeks and i haven't received any reply that is why i post
> it
> here.
>
> my purpose in buying a faster DDR was in case i want to upgrade my MB and
> processor, i dont have to buy a new RAM.
>
> i have tried it with my old PC, PII with PC100 SDR, and it worked, i am
> not
> sure if it will worked again with DDR.
>
> anyway thanks for all the replies....
>
> "Manny Borges" wrote:
>
>> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>>
>> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
>> supports
>> on many systems.
>>
>> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB , regardless
>> of
>> speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest flavor of the day.
>>
>> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
>> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will pobably
>> be
>> all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>>
>> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and you
>> may
>> need faster/diffrent RAM.
>>
>> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>>
>> And of course the RAM might not work.
>>
>> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if need
>> be.
>>
>> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>>
>> --
>> Manny Borges
>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>
>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>> with.
>> -- Marty Feldman
>> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>> >I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>> >with
>> > my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>>
>>
>>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

First, the rude:

"And you have to ask? You can only use 2100 and 2400 obviously.

Alias "

Yes, he did have to ask. The documentation could have been produced before
PC2700 ram even existed.

And now the shortsighted:

"you will gain nothing by using the more expensive RAM as your
M/B is not designed to utilize the extra speed of this newer RAM.

--
Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User"

"There is no reason to buy any RAM faster than
PC2400 for your motherboard.
Bobby"

I believe I detailed EXACTLY why these were shortsighted statements. If you
have any questions, reread my original post a few times then ask something
specific instead of a generic "why".

As for technical accuracy, again, I detailed the pros and cons of deviation
from using the expected RAM speed and reported my personal experiences.

There is a difference between a correct answer and the right answer. I try
to give the right answers.

--
Manny Borges
MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
MCT, Certified Cheese Master

The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
-- Marty Feldman
"Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u1eKpQNtFHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Be specific. Which answers are rude, short sighted and inaccurate. I see
> none posted. Everyone of the posts gave the O/P the correct answer!
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Richard Urban
> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>
> Quote from: George Ankner
> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>
> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OsT1c1KtFHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>>
>> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
>> supports on many systems.
>>
>> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB , regardless
>> of speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest flavor of the
>> day.
>>
>> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
>> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will pobably
>> be all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>>
>> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and you
>> may need faster/diffrent RAM.
>>
>> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>>
>> And of course the RAM might not work.
>>
>> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if need
>> be.
>>
>> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>>
>> --
>> Manny Borges
>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>
>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>> with.
>> -- Marty Feldman
>> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>>>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>>>with
>>> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>>
>>
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

So you are saying that the person "should not" abide by what is specified in
his motherboard manual? Bad advise, unless you personally have tested the
RAM you specify, on the same motherboard that the O/P has, and have found it
to function without problem!

If you have done so, please state this.


Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User

Quote from: George Ankner
"If you knew as much as you thought you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"

"Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O3k$%23kStFHA.1284@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> First, the rude:
>
> "And you have to ask? You can only use 2100 and 2400 obviously.
>
> Alias "
>
> Yes, he did have to ask. The documentation could have been produced before
> PC2700 ram even existed.
>
> And now the shortsighted:
>
> "you will gain nothing by using the more expensive RAM as your
> M/B is not designed to utilize the extra speed of this newer RAM.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Richard Urban
> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User"
>
> "There is no reason to buy any RAM faster than
> PC2400 for your motherboard.
> Bobby"
>
> I believe I detailed EXACTLY why these were shortsighted statements. If
> you have any questions, reread my original post a few times then ask
> something specific instead of a generic "why".
>
> As for technical accuracy, again, I detailed the pros and cons of
> deviation from using the expected RAM speed and reported my personal
> experiences.
>
> There is a difference between a correct answer and the right answer. I try
> to give the right answers.
>
> --
> Manny Borges
> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>
> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
> -- Marty Feldman
> "Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in
> message news:u1eKpQNtFHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Be specific. Which answers are rude, short sighted and inaccurate. I see
>> none posted. Everyone of the posts gave the O/P the correct answer!
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Urban
>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>>
>> Quote from: George Ankner
>> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>>
>> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:OsT1c1KtFHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>>>
>>> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
>>> supports on many systems.
>>>
>>> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB , regardless
>>> of speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest flavor of the
>>> day.
>>>
>>> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
>>> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will
>>> pobably be all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>>>
>>> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and you
>>> may need faster/diffrent RAM.
>>>
>>> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>>>
>>> And of course the RAM might not work.
>>>
>>> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if need
>>> be.
>>>
>>> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Manny Borges
>>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>>
>>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>>> with.
>>> -- Marty Feldman
>>> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>>>>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use PC4000
>>>>with
>>>> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Again, please read exactly what you are replying to before you reply. I know
you are not a simpleton, but you are starting to sound like one.

I NEVER said to simply disregard the manual and I DID specify that it may
not work and that the OP should make sure that they have the ability to
return the RAM for a diffrent type if it does not work.

Hardware product documentation is typicall woefully short on technical
details.

Making an educated decision to go outside the box with a clear understanding
of what is being done and a clear backup plan is not a bad thing.

Simply accepting a technical limitation without testing it when there is no
obvious downside is ridiculous.
--
Manny Borges
MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
MCT, Certified Cheese Master

The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
-- Marty Feldman
"Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OhmqQXatFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> So you are saying that the person "should not" abide by what is specified
> in his motherboard manual? Bad advise, unless you personally have tested
> the RAM you specify, on the same motherboard that the O/P has, and have
> found it to function without problem!
>
> If you have done so, please state this.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Urban
> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>
> Quote from: George Ankner
> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>
> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:O3k$%23kStFHA.1284@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> First, the rude:
>>
>> "And you have to ask? You can only use 2100 and 2400 obviously.
>>
>> Alias "
>>
>> Yes, he did have to ask. The documentation could have been produced
>> before PC2700 ram even existed.
>>
>> And now the shortsighted:
>>
>> "you will gain nothing by using the more expensive RAM as your
>> M/B is not designed to utilize the extra speed of this newer RAM.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Urban
>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User"
>>
>> "There is no reason to buy any RAM faster than
>> PC2400 for your motherboard.
>> Bobby"
>>
>> I believe I detailed EXACTLY why these were shortsighted statements. If
>> you have any questions, reread my original post a few times then ask
>> something specific instead of a generic "why".
>>
>> As for technical accuracy, again, I detailed the pros and cons of
>> deviation from using the expected RAM speed and reported my personal
>> experiences.
>>
>> There is a difference between a correct answer and the right answer. I
>> try to give the right answers.
>>
>> --
>> Manny Borges
>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>
>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>> with.
>> -- Marty Feldman
>> "Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> message news:u1eKpQNtFHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>> Be specific. Which answers are rude, short sighted and inaccurate. I see
>>> none posted. Everyone of the posts gave the O/P the correct answer!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Richard Urban
>>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>>>
>>> Quote from: George Ankner
>>> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
>>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>>>
>>> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:OsT1c1KtFHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>>>>
>>>> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
>>>> supports on many systems.
>>>>
>>>> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB , regardless
>>>> of speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest flavor of the
>>>> day.
>>>>
>>>> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
>>>> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will
>>>> pobably be all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>>>>
>>>> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and you
>>>> may need faster/diffrent RAM.
>>>>
>>>> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>>>>
>>>> And of course the RAM might not work.
>>>>
>>>> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if
>>>> need be.
>>>>
>>>> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Manny Borges
>>>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>>>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>>>
>>>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>>>> with.
>>>> -- Marty Feldman
>>>> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>>>>>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use
>>>>>PC4000 with
>>>>> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

I test outside the box all the time, but as I build and sell, I have loads
of new and used parts to test with. It is unrealistic to suggest to someone
who is posting here to spend money in the hopes that it "may" work -- or
not!

Based upon that, the best choice for the average person is to go with the
documentation supplied with their computer or visit www.crucial.com or
www.kingston.com , use their memory configurator, and see what THEY
recommend.

Sorry, but I can just not agree with you on this so I guess we will have to
let it go.

Bye!

--
Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User

Quote from: George Ankner
"If you knew as much as you thought you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"

"Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OXkWX6ktFHA.664@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Again, please read exactly what you are replying to before you reply. I
> know you are not a simpleton, but you are starting to sound like one.
>
> I NEVER said to simply disregard the manual and I DID specify that it may
> not work and that the OP should make sure that they have the ability to
> return the RAM for a diffrent type if it does not work.
>
> Hardware product documentation is typicall woefully short on technical
> details.
>
> Making an educated decision to go outside the box with a clear
> understanding of what is being done and a clear backup plan is not a bad
> thing.
>
> Simply accepting a technical limitation without testing it when there is
> no obvious downside is ridiculous.
> --
> Manny Borges
> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>
> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
> -- Marty Feldman
> "Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in
> message news:OhmqQXatFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> So you are saying that the person "should not" abide by what is specified
>> in his motherboard manual? Bad advise, unless you personally have tested
>> the RAM you specify, on the same motherboard that the O/P has, and have
>> found it to function without problem!
>>
>> If you have done so, please state this.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Urban
>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>>
>> Quote from: George Ankner
>> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>>
>> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:O3k$%23kStFHA.1284@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> First, the rude:
>>>
>>> "And you have to ask? You can only use 2100 and 2400 obviously.
>>>
>>> Alias "
>>>
>>> Yes, he did have to ask. The documentation could have been produced
>>> before PC2700 ram even existed.
>>>
>>> And now the shortsighted:
>>>
>>> "you will gain nothing by using the more expensive RAM as your
>>> M/B is not designed to utilize the extra speed of this newer RAM.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Richard Urban
>>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User"
>>>
>>> "There is no reason to buy any RAM faster than
>>> PC2400 for your motherboard.
>>> Bobby"
>>>
>>> I believe I detailed EXACTLY why these were shortsighted statements. If
>>> you have any questions, reread my original post a few times then ask
>>> something specific instead of a generic "why".
>>>
>>> As for technical accuracy, again, I detailed the pros and cons of
>>> deviation from using the expected RAM speed and reported my personal
>>> experiences.
>>>
>>> There is a difference between a correct answer and the right answer. I
>>> try to give the right answers.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Manny Borges
>>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>>
>>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>>> with.
>>> -- Marty Feldman
>>> "Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> message news:u1eKpQNtFHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>>> Be specific. Which answers are rude, short sighted and inaccurate. I
>>>> see none posted. Everyone of the posts gave the O/P the correct answer!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Richard Urban
>>>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>>>>
>>>> Quote from: George Ankner
>>>> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
>>>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>>>>
>>>> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:OsT1c1KtFHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
>>>>> supports on many systems.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB ,
>>>>> regardless of speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest
>>>>> flavor of the day.
>>>>>
>>>>> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
>>>>> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will
>>>>> pobably be all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and
>>>>> you may need faster/diffrent RAM.
>>>>>
>>>>> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>>>>>
>>>>> And of course the RAM might not work.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if
>>>>> need be.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Manny Borges
>>>>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>>>>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>>>>
>>>>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>>>>> with.
>>>>> -- Marty Feldman
>>>>> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>>>>>>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use
>>>>>>PC4000 with
>>>>>> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

I repeated asked you to read what you were replying to.

I am not going to reiterate myself over and over again.

You wrote:
" It is unrealistic to suggest to someone
> who is posting here to spend money in the hopes that it "may" work -- or
> not!"


I responded to this fact several times.

AGAIN ...... read what you are replying to.

I guess we will have to drop it unless you have time this weekend to take a
reading comprehension course.


--
Manny Borges
MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
MCT, Certified Cheese Master

The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
-- Marty Feldman
"Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23FCITVltFHA.2624@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>I test outside the box all the time, but as I build and sell, I have loads
>of new and used parts to test with. It is unrealistic to suggest to someone
>who is posting here to spend money in the hopes that it "may" work -- or
>not!
>
> Based upon that, the best choice for the average person is to go with the
> documentation supplied with their computer or visit www.crucial.com or
> www.kingston.com , use their memory configurator, and see what THEY
> recommend.
>
> Sorry, but I can just not agree with you on this so I guess we will have
> to let it go.
>
> Bye!
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Richard Urban
> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>
> Quote from: George Ankner
> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>
> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OXkWX6ktFHA.664@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> Again, please read exactly what you are replying to before you reply. I
>> know you are not a simpleton, but you are starting to sound like one.
>>
>> I NEVER said to simply disregard the manual and I DID specify that it may
>> not work and that the OP should make sure that they have the ability to
>> return the RAM for a diffrent type if it does not work.
>>
>> Hardware product documentation is typicall woefully short on technical
>> details.
>>
>> Making an educated decision to go outside the box with a clear
>> understanding of what is being done and a clear backup plan is not a bad
>> thing.
>>
>> Simply accepting a technical limitation without testing it when there is
>> no obvious downside is ridiculous.
>> --
>> Manny Borges
>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>
>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>> with.
>> -- Marty Feldman
>> "Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> message news:OhmqQXatFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>> So you are saying that the person "should not" abide by what is
>>> specified in his motherboard manual? Bad advise, unless you personally
>>> have tested the RAM you specify, on the same motherboard that the O/P
>>> has, and have found it to function without problem!
>>>
>>> If you have done so, please state this.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Richard Urban
>>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>>>
>>> Quote from: George Ankner
>>> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
>>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>>>
>>> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:O3k$%23kStFHA.1284@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>>> First, the rude:
>>>>
>>>> "And you have to ask? You can only use 2100 and 2400 obviously.
>>>>
>>>> Alias "
>>>>
>>>> Yes, he did have to ask. The documentation could have been produced
>>>> before PC2700 ram even existed.
>>>>
>>>> And now the shortsighted:
>>>>
>>>> "you will gain nothing by using the more expensive RAM as your
>>>> M/B is not designed to utilize the extra speed of this newer RAM.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Richard Urban
>>>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User"
>>>>
>>>> "There is no reason to buy any RAM faster than
>>>> PC2400 for your motherboard.
>>>> Bobby"
>>>>
>>>> I believe I detailed EXACTLY why these were shortsighted statements. If
>>>> you have any questions, reread my original post a few times then ask
>>>> something specific instead of a generic "why".
>>>>
>>>> As for technical accuracy, again, I detailed the pros and cons of
>>>> deviation from using the expected RAM speed and reported my personal
>>>> experiences.
>>>>
>>>> There is a difference between a correct answer and the right answer. I
>>>> try to give the right answers.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Manny Borges
>>>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>>>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>>>
>>>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>>>> with.
>>>> -- Marty Feldman
>>>> "Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>> message news:u1eKpQNtFHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Be specific. Which answers are rude, short sighted and inaccurate. I
>>>>> see none posted. Everyone of the posts gave the O/P the correct
>>>>> answer!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Urban
>>>>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>>>>>
>>>>> Quote from: George Ankner
>>>>> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
>>>>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>>>>>
>>>>> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:OsT1c1KtFHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
>>>>>> supports on many systems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB ,
>>>>>> regardless of speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest
>>>>>> flavor of the day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
>>>>>> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will
>>>>>> pobably be all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and
>>>>>> you may need faster/diffrent RAM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And of course the RAM might not work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if
>>>>>> need be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Manny Borges
>>>>>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>>>>>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>>>>>> with.
>>>>>> -- Marty Feldman
>>>>>> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>>>>>>>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use
>>>>>>>PC4000 with
>>>>>>> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

bye

--
Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User

Quote from: George Ankner
"If you knew as much as you thought you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"

"Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Okp$DLwtFHA.3932@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>I repeated asked you to read what you were replying to.
>
> I am not going to reiterate myself over and over again.
>
> You wrote:
> " It is unrealistic to suggest to someone
>> who is posting here to spend money in the hopes that it "may" work -- or
>> not!"
>
>
> I responded to this fact several times.
>
> AGAIN ...... read what you are replying to.
>
> I guess we will have to drop it unless you have time this weekend to take
> a reading comprehension course.
>
>
> --
> Manny Borges
> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>
> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with.
> -- Marty Feldman
> "Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in
> message news:%23FCITVltFHA.2624@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>>I test outside the box all the time, but as I build and sell, I have loads
>>of new and used parts to test with. It is unrealistic to suggest to
>>someone who is posting here to spend money in the hopes that it "may"
>>work -- or not!
>>
>> Based upon that, the best choice for the average person is to go with the
>> documentation supplied with their computer or visit www.crucial.com or
>> www.kingston.com , use their memory configurator, and see what THEY
>> recommend.
>>
>> Sorry, but I can just not agree with you on this so I guess we will have
>> to let it go.
>>
>> Bye!
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Urban
>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>>
>> Quote from: George Ankner
>> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>>
>> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:OXkWX6ktFHA.664@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> Again, please read exactly what you are replying to before you reply. I
>>> know you are not a simpleton, but you are starting to sound like one.
>>>
>>> I NEVER said to simply disregard the manual and I DID specify that it
>>> may not work and that the OP should make sure that they have the ability
>>> to return the RAM for a diffrent type if it does not work.
>>>
>>> Hardware product documentation is typicall woefully short on technical
>>> details.
>>>
>>> Making an educated decision to go outside the box with a clear
>>> understanding of what is being done and a clear backup plan is not a bad
>>> thing.
>>>
>>> Simply accepting a technical limitation without testing it when there is
>>> no obvious downside is ridiculous.
>>> --
>>> Manny Borges
>>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>>
>>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>>> with.
>>> -- Marty Feldman
>>> "Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> message news:OhmqQXatFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>>> So you are saying that the person "should not" abide by what is
>>>> specified in his motherboard manual? Bad advise, unless you personally
>>>> have tested the RAM you specify, on the same motherboard that the O/P
>>>> has, and have found it to function without problem!
>>>>
>>>> If you have done so, please state this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Richard Urban
>>>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>>>>
>>>> Quote from: George Ankner
>>>> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
>>>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>>>>
>>>> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:O3k$%23kStFHA.1284@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>>>> First, the rude:
>>>>>
>>>>> "And you have to ask? You can only use 2100 and 2400 obviously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias "
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, he did have to ask. The documentation could have been produced
>>>>> before PC2700 ram even existed.
>>>>>
>>>>> And now the shortsighted:
>>>>>
>>>>> "you will gain nothing by using the more expensive RAM as your
>>>>> M/B is not designed to utilize the extra speed of this newer RAM.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Urban
>>>>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User"
>>>>>
>>>>> "There is no reason to buy any RAM faster than
>>>>> PC2400 for your motherboard.
>>>>> Bobby"
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe I detailed EXACTLY why these were shortsighted statements.
>>>>> If you have any questions, reread my original post a few times then
>>>>> ask something specific instead of a generic "why".
>>>>>
>>>>> As for technical accuracy, again, I detailed the pros and cons of
>>>>> deviation from using the expected RAM speed and reported my personal
>>>>> experiences.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a difference between a correct answer and the right answer. I
>>>>> try to give the right answers.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Manny Borges
>>>>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>>>>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>>>>
>>>>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>>>>> with.
>>>>> -- Marty Feldman
>>>>> "Richard Urban [MVP]" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> message news:u1eKpQNtFHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Be specific. Which answers are rude, short sighted and inaccurate. I
>>>>>> see none posted. Everyone of the posts gave the O/P the correct
>>>>>> answer!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Richard Urban
>>>>>> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quote from: George Ankner
>>>>>> "If you knew as much as you thought you know,
>>>>>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Manny Borges" <manny_borges@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:OsT1c1KtFHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Lots of rude answers, and none of them acurate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have had no issues using faster clocked ram than my board says it
>>>>>>> supports on many systems.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have found that most ram ram costs about the same per MB ,
>>>>>>> regardless of speed, with the exception of the latest and greatest
>>>>>>> flavor of the day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Buying slow ram is like throwing money out.
>>>>>>> If you update your proc and mobo, or buy a new computer, you will
>>>>>>> pobably be all set to transfer this ram to the new system.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did say *possibly*. The new system might be bigger and badder and
>>>>>>> you may need faster/diffrent RAM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But isn't possibly, better than not at all?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And of course the RAM might not work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I highly doubt that. Make sure you can return or exchange it if
>>>>>>> need be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, ignore the shortsighted answers you have previously recieved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Manny Borges
>>>>>>> MCSE NT4-2003 (+ Security)
>>>>>>> MCT, Certified Cheese Master
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write
>>>>>>> with.
>>>>>>> -- Marty Feldman
>>>>>>> "jercs" <jercs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:B54523CA-FBDE-4E6F-80B5-B117C783755A@microsoft.com...
>>>>>>>>I am planning to upgrade my DDR, i want to ask if it is OK to use
>>>>>>>>PC4000 with
>>>>>>>> my motherboard, my MB says that i can use PC2100 and PC2400
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>