Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table (Archive)

[prd0000]

You guys couldn't be bothered to update this for Black Friday? seriously?

The answer perhaps, they don't want to return the money they got from nVidia.

 

[kgt1182]

A RX 480 for $330, GTX 1060 for $250. So you are taking the most expensive RX 480 availiable to compare with the cheapest GTX 1060.
NVIDIA really hacked into this chart and tried inflating the prices. RX 480 can be gotten for $200 and it has already been announced that the RRP would be lower than that of GTX 1060.

 

[RedJaron]

You guys couldn't be bothered to update this for Black Friday? seriously?

The answer perhaps, they don't want to return the money they got from nVidia.

We take accusations of bribery and shilling very seriously on this site. If you want to provide actual evidence of this, do so. Your AMD biases have been noted, but that's no proof of unethical actions on TH's part. Continued ranting like this will see you out the airlock.

 

[penn919]

We take accusations of bribery and shilling very seriously on this site. If you want to provide actual evidence of this, do so. Your AMD biases have been noted, but that's no proof of unethical actions on TH's part. Continued ranting like this will see you out the airlock.[/color][/b]

Would you mind explaining what exactly a "Radeon Fury Namo" is?

 

[RedJaron]

Methinks you were trying to reply to someone else, as neither I nor anyone else on this thread has used "namo" to describe anything

 

[penn919]

Methinks you were trying to reply to someone else, as neither I nor anyone else on this thread has used "namo" to describe anything

Sorry, I should have been more clear. I was referring to the typo on your Hierachy table. The nano is supposed to be called the R9 Nano not "Fury Namo".

 

[Co BIY]

Based on the recent Tom's review of the GTX 1050 ($119 at Amazon) it would be placed on the same tier as the GTX 950 and AMD RX 460.

GTX 1050 Ti ($149 at Newegg) would sit a tier above it.

 

[xDeuiii]

This list should be updated.

 

[HugoMeira]

This table is outdated. RX 480 8GB costs $ 239.99. And recent tests show that it is equivalent to GTX 1060 6GB in DX11 e superior in DX12.

 

[HugoMeira]

This table is outdated. RX 480 8GB costs $ 239.99. And recent tests show that it is equivalent to GTX 1060 6GB in DX11 and superior in DX12.

 

[penn919]

It's highly out of date with a lot number of questionable rankings. It's even missing GPUs that have been released for months already.

 

[MushBrain]

The GTX 670 is massively faster than the 580, it's in the same league as the 960, the 760 is quite a bit slower than the 670.

RX 480 is equal to the 1060.

Sort your chart out it's not at all accurate.

 

[weberdarren97]

The Radeon Fury Nano is spelled Namo. The GTX Titan Z is not on this list.

Other than that, I'd say I agree completely with this list. Very handy to have as a reference.

 

[John Philips]

And where are Titan Z and Iris 580 ?

 

[John Philips]

And where are Titan Z and Iris 580 ?

 

[CRGravityGaming]

I don't see the GT 710 anywhere on this table. I use this table as a reference for all of my builds, so I trust it to be correct

 

[mikerx7]

when will you add the gtx 1050?

 

[Math Geek]

1050 is about a gtx 950 in strength and the 1050ti is about a 960.

not added yet to this list yet but that's well known performance numbers mentally add them to the list in those slots

 

[dotaloc]

Still love being able to reference this chart and always appreciate the updates!

That said, I feel like the 480 should be separated into 4GB and 8GB variants. However, I feel it is even more important that the 1060 be split into 6GB and 3GB variants, considering the even more notable differences.

On cards (like the 7790 or 460) with more than 1 available memory configuration, it seems like you should at least specify which one was tested...some people using this chart might not even know there are different options.

I have to agree with some others, in light of more and more dx12 and vulkan games, I feel like some of this should be revisited/reconsidered -- maybe even a note that CGN cards tend to perform, in general, notably better (or, NVidia worse, comparatively) on more modern APIs.

 

[okeydokey]

the table for the GPU's fors not Render well on android mobile samsung galaxy phones. Opera browser.

perhaps adjust the Div's a little.

 

[okeydokey]

https://s28.postimg.org/h841oddu5/Screenshot_2016_12_20_19_38_16.png

 

[Dragos Manea]

nVidia is praised too much in here, 1060 cannot be at fury level, also r9 295X2 it is at GTX 1080 level (even surpasses the gtx 1080 and i can prove that).

 

[niceguy1]

please add gtx 1050 to chart. good work. pricing links are not best. perhaps find the latest sale prices and change text color?

 

[ffleader1]

Great. We are at the end of 2016 with various site have rebenchmarked and proved that Rx 480 have surpassed the 1060 yet you guys still but the 1060 above the 480 based on launch-day benchmark.
Either Nvidia Bias or Nvidia's money Bias...so what is it?

 

[kaiserc]

Time to uypdate your hierarchy as it now wrong