Wow, you're right... You could pair DDR400 (underclocked to DDR266, then OCed) for 133/133 operation at DDR266 speeds and 1.73Ghz, and then overclock this system to <b>dual-channel DDR400, 800Mhz and 2.6Ghz core clock</b>.........
Although the x86-secret article mentions that 915M is only stable for clock speeds of up to 190Mhz... which is not quite 800Mhz FSB... Their maximum overclock indicates you could probably run a rig with dual-channel DDR266 at 2.13Ghz and 533Mhz and get this to work as <b>dual-channel DDR333 at 2.67Ghz and 667Mhz FSB....</b> which should be quite impressive nonetheless.
Too bad sonoma still doesn't have 64-bit capability.
In any case, overclockability and the ability to get to the 800Mhz FSB/DDR400/2.6Ghz combo will probably be investigated further by many more people on the net. We're bound not to be the only ones thinking of these possibilities!
We can't possibly be the only ones thinking of putting <A HREF="http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=1659" target="_new">this</A> desktop board (has PCIe, SATA2, Firewire, DDR1 or DDR2!) together with a sonoma-platform dothan and a heavy-duty cooler (if possible) like <A HREF="http://www.zalmanusa.com/usa/product/view.asp?idx=141&code=005009" target="_new">this</A> for maximum overclockability, can we? And keep in mind x86-secret has used only stock voltage. I wonder what this new stepping is truly capable of.........
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Mephistopheles on 01/21/05 01:08 AM.</EM></FONT></P>