Hey everyone, I've read for a while but this is my first post. My question regards the Core 2 Duo E6850 which is at 3.0 Ghz and a 1333MHz FSB and the Core 2 Quad Q6600 which is at 2.4Ghz and 1066MHz FSB. I've been researching for an new gaming rig and seeing how these two are at nearly identical price points I'm having trouble deciding. For starters I realize that the E6850 is better for game at the moment because of its speed. But at the same time the Q6600 has the additional two cores which may not be used now but I'm looking forward to their usage in games like Alan Wake as well as their flat out multi-tasking abilities. Also I have never over clocked before without hardware assistance (eg. my motherboard only lets me over clock my CPU via percentages like 5%, 10%, nothing can be done manually.) and when I have it was simply to try, nothing that I kept longer than 10 minutes. So I know that I've heard the Q6600 can be overclocked to the 3.0 Ghz point which essentially would make it a E6850 with 2 additional cores. However being that I am unexperienced at overclocking I'd like to know the consequences of this. I do not want to damage a $250+ item in my rig. I read here at TomsHardware.com about something called electron migration which damages the core and whatnot. I've also gathered that by simply upping the FSB from 1066 to 1333 on the Q6600 will bring it to the 3.0 point. So tell me, what to do? To the advantages outweight the disadvantages? If the effect on my CPU from overclocking will shorten its life by 4 years when it's life expectancy is 10 that would be fine--I plan to upgrade before it get's close to that point. Is 3.0 Ghz a safe overclock? Thanks for your help in advance!
Oh and by the way I'd like to stay away from water cooling as well.
Oh and by the way I'd like to stay away from water cooling as well.