G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)
I picked up a copy of Races of Eberron. The book is quite good. The
best parts being the chapters on Warforged and Shifters. In the
Warforged chapter the author mentions that they make good Barbarians. He
also mentions that the Adamantium Body Feat offers the WF a better AC
than most Barbarians are likely to achieve. And that the Barbarians
increased movement helps to offset the penalty to speed imposed by that
Feat. Except... the AB Feat is considered to be heavy armour, which
means the Barbarian doesn't get a movement increase while using heavy
armour... So, is RoE just plain out wrong?
I have a character concept for a WF unit trained to charge in and
take out polearms. To clear a path for the cavalry. I thought that
Barbarians would be a good choice.
--
Tetsubo
My page: http://home.comcast.net/~tetsubo/
--------------------------------------
If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
-- Anatole France
I picked up a copy of Races of Eberron. The book is quite good. The
best parts being the chapters on Warforged and Shifters. In the
Warforged chapter the author mentions that they make good Barbarians. He
also mentions that the Adamantium Body Feat offers the WF a better AC
than most Barbarians are likely to achieve. And that the Barbarians
increased movement helps to offset the penalty to speed imposed by that
Feat. Except... the AB Feat is considered to be heavy armour, which
means the Barbarian doesn't get a movement increase while using heavy
armour... So, is RoE just plain out wrong?
I have a character concept for a WF unit trained to charge in and
take out polearms. To clear a path for the cavalry. I thought that
Barbarians would be a good choice.
--
Tetsubo
My page: http://home.comcast.net/~tetsubo/
--------------------------------------
If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
-- Anatole France