New EVGA teaser suggests that the company is preparing a X570 motherboard for AMD processors.
EVGA Joins Team Red, Teases First Ever AMD Motherboard : Read more
EVGA Joins Team Red, Teases First Ever AMD Motherboard : Read more
The scheduled forum maintenance has now been completed. If you spot any issues, please report them here in this thread. Thank you!
I wish with all my heart that is the case.Hopefully they will start selling AMD graphics cards, as well.
nVidia might stop selling them chips if they do. That's what happened to XFX.Hopefully they will start selling AMD graphics cards, as well.
nVidia might stop selling them chips if they do. That's what happened to XFX.
XFX was one of the most reputable AIBs when they started making AMD cards and NVIDIA was willing to dump them.With how Nvidia angers their AIB's, they might not care. Also, I don't see Nvidia abandoning what is probably their biggest AIB partner, sales wise.
XFX was one of the most reputable AIBs when they started making AMD cards and NVIDIA was willing to dump them.
Besides that, NVIDIA still has a handful of other AIBs that are exclusive to them.
Galax (outside USA) and Palit perhaps?Zotac is about the only one that comes to mind, for the US market, that is solely Nvidia. Asus, MSI, and Gigabyte sell both. Evga I am quite sure outsells all of them.
I'm pretty sure SEA has taken over that mantle, if not China.Yea Galax and Palit have 0 US presence, and the US is one of the largest markets, if not the largest, gaming PC wise. Also the bad PR, if Nvidia tried to stop EVGA from making AMD graphics cards, would be terrible.
nVidia might stop selling them chips if they do. That's what happened to XFX.
With how Nvidia angers their AIB's, they might not care.
Yea Galax and Palit have 0 US presence, and the US is one of the largest markets, if not the largest, gaming PC wise. Also the bad PR, if Nvidia tried to stop EVGA from making AMD graphics cards, would be terrible.
With how Nvidia angers their AIB's, they might not care. Also, I don't see Nvidia abandoning what is probably their biggest AIB partner, sales wise.
XFX was one of the most reputable AIBs when they started making AMD cards and NVIDIA was willing to dump them.
Besides that, NVIDIA still has a handful of other AIBs that are exclusive to them.
it depends on what kind of contract they had with nvidia when they agree to do the partnership. some well known brand like Asus, Gigabyte, MSI end up selling both AMD and nvidia GPU. and those still considered as nvidia tier 1 partner much like EVGA. and with XFX nvidia did not stop selling chips with them outright. i think it might be XFX decision to completely cut ties with nvidia.
it was the opposite actually. some partners might not like what nvidia did but majority if not all of them would rather agree with nvidia terms rather than unable to sell nvidia GPU at all. what happen to XFX should be a clear indication why they need nvidia business when it comes to selling discrete GPU.
rather than nvidia the biggest resistance for EVGA to make GPU for AMD will be coming from AMD existing AIB.
So either XFX was dumb for not doing this, dumb for being mad about it and willingly agreed to spite NVIDIA, or there's something more to this that we don't know because law isn't easy to understand.Here in the states, that would qualify under Anti-Trust if someone wanted to make a stink about it. You aren't allowed to threaten to cut off supply if you purchase from a competitor.
It's not always about "doing the right thing" with the law: look at AMD and Intel; AMD accepted money instead of following through with the case so now they can't sue Intel again (over the same reason) and can't divulge the contents of the settlement. Also, I don't think XFX had enough resources to fight a court battle against nVidia and, on the other hand, I wouldn't underestimate exec's egos. Look at Apple and Samsung, for instance.So either XFX was dumb for not doing this, dumb for being mad about it and willingly agreed to spite NVIDIA, or there's something more to this that we don't know because law isn't easy to understand.
You might want to correct your article title. EVGA made AM2 socket boards for AMD and quite popular they were.
Correction, this is not the first AMD motherboard EVGA has made. They did have one during A64 days using Nforce chipset.
If you read the article:1st ever? I guess all those 939 nforce mobos I must have imagined.
If you read the article:
"Some might argue that EVGA has made motherboards for AMD processors in the past, such as the EVGA nForce 730a. Technically, they weren't AMD motherboards per say since they utilized Nvidia's chipsets. "
Okay so tell me what are NVIDIA's options if EVGA goes AMD? They don't have any more Exclusive US Presence so anybody else they pick will be a AMD brand partner too.
This all smells of a ploy to get better pricing. AIB's haven't been happy with NVIDIA's pricing on this gen claiming the BOM was way too low. Well there is evidence of this, there's also clear evidence with their MSRP pricing they are also being greedy when possible. With graphics cards crashing in price, they may looking for a way to keep higher margins.
They would call the board by the chipset (Nforce2 board) or possibly the socket/slot and chipset maker (VIA socket 7 board) which is same thing we do now. If someone asks you what kind of motherboard you have now, you wouldn't say Intel or AMD. You'd say you have an X570 motherboard or Z490 motherboard.Back then when VIA makes chipsets for Intel and AMD, pple don't call it a VIA mainboard, its still Intel or AMD mainboard. Even during athlon days when both VIA and nvidia made chipsets, nobody calls them VIA or Nvidia mainboard.