cbrunnem :
thequn :
LOL i seen a lot of test of a lot of tim's and the funny thing is every test is dramatically different esp the Mayo test that beets 90% of the TIM out there.
thats because most of the test you see online are basement test of sorts. they are statistically inaccurate as the sample sizes used are normally not high enough and the methods are inherently innaccurate. to get a good result you would need to use something more accurate then an actually cpu and heatsink. now doing something like that would not give you real word number but rather comparative numbers against other TIMs. now thats not to say that most online results you see arent good just not accurate or precise. theres no way you could be precise with a cpu/motherboard/heatsink combo.
What really matter to us, the users of the products, are the results from cpu/motherboard/heatsink combo testing, in hopes that we get the same results for ourselves.
Even those results can be different if the application of the TIM is done improperly simply because the user is clueless as to what the TIM can and cannot do regarding how it is applied.
Too many are just ignorant as to how to apply TIM in the first place as is proved by whats under some graphics card heat sinks applied to the GPU die, some look like the TIM was applied with a caulking gun.
And these are the ones that are supposed to know what they're doing, applying thermal compound from the graphics card manufacturer!
All along TIM is only to fill the microscopic imperfections between the 2 contacting surfaces, it was never designed to be applied as a full layer, and the best results have everything to do with the TIMs application.
Even when we're talking the same TIM tested by different testers with varying results, pertaining to using too much in the application, uncontrolled ambient for air cooling tests, and uncontrolled water temperatures for the water cooling tests.
You can trust the tests I ran to give you the same results as long as the sentence above is the same, and I know they were not laboratory conducted, but usually that's the same excuse the brand holders give when their products don't rock the world in reality, when all their tests were strictly controlled to their marketing advantage.
Which does happen!
Since we're on this subject you might find this interesting.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/1738434/last-read
So cbrunnem, How have you been doing?
It's been a while since you've posted in this thread, my Peltier cooling has been in operation now for over 8 months and is working very well.
Hope you and your family are all well! Ryan