Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.print_fax (
More info?)
I see. That makes sense. The email routing is being done manually, then.
You were much better at reading between the lines than I. That was why I
kept asking for clarification as to what the actual steps were that produced
the behavior. And, indeed, the issue has nothing to do with the XP fax
software or its integration with Outlook. But knowing what the default email
software is and how it is configured would be necessary to arrive at a
solution.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Earl F. Parrish" <efparri@nowhere.world> wrote in message
news
WQae.2370$Nc.927@trnddc03...
>
> "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" <russval@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23pJa9wHSFHA.996@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Routing received faxes to Outlook's Inbox with Windows XP Fax works with
>> no version of Outlook. I would love to see evidence to the contrary. By
>> Microsoft's own admission that feature was removed.
>> --
>> Russ Valentine
>> [MVP-Outlook]
>
> This is the scenario I perceive with the original poster. Each of the
> workstations on his network has fax modems connected to the telephone
> network. Whether each as its own number is unclear. One of the
> workstations receives a fax. The operator of that workstation emails the
> fax, just as you can any file on a computer, as an attachment to a email
> message to some or all of the other workstations. Outlook should use the
> established connection setting in Internet Explorer to send the message.
> In the case of the errant Windows XP workstation, the Internet connection
> is messed up and the Wizard starts to setup a new connection. By
> configuring the connection the same as the other workstations, the problem
> would be solved.
>
> For the workstation originally receiving the fax, a copy would be present
> in the Sent Items folder. For those receiving a copy of the fax by email,
> a copy would be in the Inbox. No one said that the original incoming fax
> would be in the Inbox of the receiving workstation.
>
> I will admit that this is not a fax problem per se, but is an Internet
> connection problem. The original poster might have been brushed off in
> another newsgroup, just as you did here.
>
>
> --
> Earl F. Parrish
>