Firepro V4800 VS Quadro 2000

Madni Ali

Reputable
Apr 1, 2015
29
0
4,530
I am making a Video Editing+Gaming Pc.Which one will be the Best..
Quadro 2000
Firepro V4800
I know that they are not for gaming..But i think according to my budget .this will be the best cards for gaming and rendering.
If any other card is better than them in the respective budget then please guide me.
 
Hope your not buying either new. you can get them for less than $100 each. Heck a Quadro 5000 is $150 on ebay.

Anyways for entry level work. It really doesn't matter. You won't be able to play games really above 720p low settings.

Quadro 2000 = Geforce GTS 450
Firepro V4800 = Radeon HD 5670 (couldn't find exact chip - RV830)


In this case, the Firepro V4800 is going to be more powerful
 

Yes.You are right.There is a similar thread created by me.But the difference is that.On that thread I was focusing on 750ti for my PC.Which has been bought by me.Thanks to you.It is doing good job in Gaming and also rendering.
Now I want to making a decent or low level System for my younger brother,And want to make a system that can do good job in Gaming and Rendering too.So want to have a Quadro or Firepro GPU that can give me Good FPS in games.And better rendering time.
 


Do you mean that GTS 450 will be giving approciamately same rendering time as Quadro 2000
Or
That a Quadro 2000 will give same FPS in games like GTS 450.
Btw I have heard that V4800 is better than Quadro 2000 in gaming.
 


They are one in the same. difference is the quadro has slightly lower clocks but the benefit is of course the professional drivers and supports for 30bit color depth. Some apps like CAD will not even run on a geforce card.

If you are just using the card for rendering video using the CUDA cores, the geforce card will be faster. If you are using the GPU to render 3d images, than your CPU is going to do all the work anyways so depending on the app, it may or may not make a difference which card you use.

You really shouldn't use a workstation card for gaming, its just a waste of money.
 
Cad runs just fine on geforce and it uses dx so benchmarks even show them beating all workstation cards. Unless we are talking about different cad. Usually refers to autocad. But I still don't know of any version of cad that can't run on geforce. 3d image rendering can use gpu too.
 
I am getting Confuse... 😱.
Quadro 2000 is better than V4800?
And Gts 450 is better than Quadro 2000?
Is this you are trying to explain ?
I just want a GPU that can give Good FPS in games...And can run all the Video Editing Programs...i will be using Adobe Products,Blender,Max,Maya and Cenima 4d.The gpu should run all these program and can give me a decent render time.
 
All those programs use the CPU to do the final render. Now the video card will help with the framerate while editing video and working on 3d projects. So choose your poison. I've used both and still own both. they are long since retired and sitting in a box because my (other old card) Quadro FX 4800 I got a few years ago for $100 outperforms both those cards.
 
Blender, max, and premiere have gpu renderers. Ae has gpu rendering 3d ray tracing but that's too limited to truly mention. Blender has cycles which can use opencl and cuda but has had better support with cuda. Max has quicksilver which uses either and iray which is cuda only. Adobe premiere has gpu rendering that can use opencl or cuda.

Do you own the gpus or are you buying them?
 


No I donot own these Gpus.... 🙁
All these points which you have mention...goes with Nvidia side.So thinking to buy Quadro 2000..But will it be playing BF4 or FC 4 on high setting With Core2Quad and 6 GB ram.....
And please give me some links regarding these points...So i can more clear my mind.