For the same price...

Except in the benchmarks/applications that actually NEED the added speed, most of those are bandwidth limited more than clock cycle limited.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 
The 3.06 will win most benchies...
I'll have to say you didn't do you homework entirely Piii_man!

http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1834&p=4
Anandtech's thorough tests (and most other websites') revealed the 2.8C often leads, and in overall is much better than the 3.06GHZ. I'd even say it overclocks better thanks to the lower clock speed.

For its lower price, higher performance, and much headroom, I strongly would recommend the 2.8C over the 3.06GHZ no matter what.

--
<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/album.html" target="_new"><font color=green><b>A sexual experience like never before seen</font color=green></b></A>
Site has now even more sexy members, for your pleasure.
 
The 2.8C will probably give you just a hair in games, you can surf the net at lightening speed with a PII 400 so your choice in processor is not a factor.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 
I think what would sell him to it would be likely the excellent multimedia capabilities. Video, sound, image editing will definitely be better.

--
<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/album.html" target="_new"><font color=green><b>A sexual experience like never before seen</font color=green></b></A>
Site has now even more sexy members, for your pleasure.