[quotemsg=17524880,0,395779]...because the whole point of this case is custom loop water cooling - as is the Define S that it's based on. If that were not part of the design, then the whole front 40% of the case wouldn't be there, or it would be filled with drive bays or something useful, not just empty space. You think they put that big empty front section of the case just because they couldn't figure out another way to fit a long graphics card? This is why I took issue with the article stopping at demonstrating its performance on air. While it's nice to know, if you're just doing air and also go out of your way to build itx, this case would be a very strange choice, because yes, if you're not actually planning to use that space for a reservoir, pump, and a big fat radiator, then it certainly isn't all that compact.
It's like looking at a pick-up truck and saying "well it's not all that compact". People buy pick-up trucks because they need the big empty bed in the back to put things in. If you don't need it, then obviously you shouldn't be looking at pick-up trucks.[/quotemsg]
And exactly, this review was not of a water cooling setup, great the case supports it, but the review was not about that specifically. The case was tested with air cooling thus I compared it to a superior chassis that does as good if not better while being able to fit more hardware, not including a custom loop, heck if you knew the case I was mentioning you'd know it's not a case for water cooling. Had I wanted to refer to a comparable case that does water cooling with a similar volume I would look at the Corsair 250D, again a better solution than this IMO.
You used a great example, it's like reviewing a pickup truck with a fifth wheel by pulling a small hitch mount trailer, not exactly using it to it's full potential. Your gripe should be with the guy who wrote the article and didn't bother testing the case in the proper scenario. I was just pointing out a better solution for said scenario...