GeForce GTX 750 Ti Review: Maxwell Adds Performance Using Less Power

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
So I read this review and was sold! But then I find out this is a non-purchasable reference card and theres a range of gtx 750ti's out there - which one is best?
 


What you on about? Low end MAXWELL yes, but the GT/GTX 7xx series is DEFINITELY not released low end first.

I do not think maxwell will be such a large improvement per watt and die size across the whole board.

If it is, wow. Just wow.
 
I picked up one of these, it's surprisingly impressive, I'm not expecting all the bells & whistles out of it like you would get out of a 770 or 780 or whatnot but it does the job for mid-range usage. Perfect for most games on Steam Big Picture and it plays just about every game I have on my PC just fine (with some tweaking with graphics settings) and it's a bit of a step up from my 560Ti with less power consumption.
 
What version were the drivers and cuda used for the this mining test? I have been unable to get cuda to recognize my 750 ti. I'm running Windows 7 ultimate x64, Latest Drivers from Nvidia(334.89) and Cuda 5.5.20.
 


Probably 6.0.1 which comes with 334.89.

Perform a clean install of drivers (the option is in the custom install package).

 
I'm awaiting acceptance to the nvidia developer group so that I can download cuda 6.0.1. While I'm waiting I got it working with cuda 5.0.
 
Not bad for a 60 watt card. Can't wait to see a bigger maxwell chip. BTW, the LTC mining numbers posted for the 270x are quite low. These cards average 440-450 KHash on scrypt coins.
 
Other than finding efficiency it all leaves me meh!... Sure it looks good against its GK106 cousin but, that not saying a lot as the GK106 wasn’t sincerely efficient or great performance. While this Maxwell has it better in efficiency it just doesn’t raise the bar in performance of a $150 mainstream offering. It feels like the Nvidia had more of an edict to keep it under 75W, than making a solid mainstream gaming offering.
 


Maybe that was the point?
 
I believe low wattage was indeed the point. I find it hard to consider a card drawing only 60W but with HD7790 performance "disappointing," particularly as long as the price is right. This is a solid mainstream card.
 


I believe low wattage was indeed the point. I find it hard to consider a card drawing only 60W but with HD7790 performance "disappointing," particularly as long as the price is right. This is a solid mainstream card.

Both right... This is a perfect card for non-hardcore gamers. Although I think $150 is still too much. If it was priced closer to $100 it would shake things up quite a bit.


 
If you have an OEM rig, the $150 price tag isn't as bad, since you don't have to add the cost of a PSU to your upgrade. An inferior card and upgrade to a quality PSU could easily come close to the price of a GTX 750ti.
 

A $100 would mean it would be the best entry/mid value card on any book.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.