[citation][nom]doomdesire86[/nom]Why is everyone hatin on nvidia....each company has their UPs and DOWNs.[/citation]
Yes, that much is true. Even Intel and of course AMD/ATI have had downs. But nVidia has done screw up after screw up after screw up for years. They are now running more on marketing than technology, they are recycling products, they have perhaps the dumbest naming of a product.
Are the GeForce cards are GTX cards? Whats the point of "GTX" is the model numbers won't allow a bottom end "GTX", such as the GTX 310... oops, its a G310 which is are re-labeled G210. Or the GTs250 which is a re-packaged 9800GTX which is an overclocked and updated 8800GT Aaaaaaaaaaaagh!
So the G, GTX, GT, GTS are useless and meaning tags for products. They made more sense if you were referring to the same tech (8800) but differ speeds (GTs/GTX/Ultra). The 9000s should have been 8000s since they were no different than 8000s. So the 9800GTs should have been 8900GTs. Then their DX10-G2xx cards would have made sense to call them 9000 series. With that THE whole new DX11 line could have been the new ### model numbers. What happen to the 100 series? They skipped the 300 "named" series, except for the 310/320 whatever.
They're finally phasing out the geForce 9x00/8x00 series of cards.
ATI has their generation and feature sets clearly defined. the 2000 / 3000 / 4000 / 5000 are in their classes and easily understood.
- Nvidia + Chipgate... ouch.