GF100 (Fermi) previews and discussion

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.


That's why certain "toys" were invented for women to keep them entertained why their boy toy is distracted by shiny things. Heck, they usually say the toy does a better job anyways....

Btw, hallowed, I want a red batmobile now........ dang you!! I'd even put 2 bezels in the middle of the windshield so it felt right 😛
 

well we all know that tessels are what they put on bike handles for kids , leather jackets, nipple covers for burlesque performers and batons for cheerleaders 😀
 


Tassel........ fail. 😛

And no, I don't appreciate sarcasm... cough cough.
 

someone has to represent the idiot class of pc users, i suggest we all take turns and build a library of misconceptions based on our sarcastic superiority, which we can then draw from when noobs attempt to make arguments without the proper data.

This would be a conspiracy to infuriate agro noobs. 😀 agro is slang for agressive in this context.
 


sarcasm.jpg
 
About damn time Crytek moved away from it's comfort zone of wide open forests and jungles and went with a Urban environment. I've jsut recently completed the original Crysis and Warhead and I have to say they were really good games I don't why they got so much stick from users, the game is very scalable, the nano suit adds an extra dynamic to the gameplay (I loved playing a a stealthy character which reminded of me Thief, it was good fun) apart from the one dodgy level inside the space craft it was a classic FPS and I'm looking forward to Crysis 3 although not as much as Aliens Vs Predator 3!
 
By the reviews out does anyone know if the gf100 fermi is better same or worse then a 5970? I would like to know. I cant wait until there are real benchmarks
 


The most credible previews we have show it at just under the 5970 but those are previews and are made by nVidia so who knows.
 


I'm doubting this a bit, but who knows. nVidia is nothing if not horrible with their naming.
 

:lol: Oh noes, that would mean that those fake benchies that were posted were fake!
 

Like 1900XTX and HD2900XT are great names, if anything gpu makers are horrible at naming. Imo as long as a company keeps to numbers and doesn't shove XT CTS GTX GS GT etc on their cards and the numbers make sense for a group of the series such as 4000's or 200's like lower number is less power they are doing it just fine by me.


What about the real benchmarks of the GF100 😀

Fun fact not really part of their "say something about your self box thingy"
"NVIDIA is the worldwide leader in visual computing technologies and the inventor of the GPU."
lol must be a tight definition of GPU
 
Status
Not open for further replies.