rupert86 wrote:
2. Cheapo PC-Chips/ECS/Asrock boards. Usually they're designs are so inefficient they'll start POSTing at least 10 seconds after you hit the power button. (This isn't a problem during normal service, but you see we assemble PCs for people and its a real pain to wait everytime during those 1001 restarts windows makes you go through). Examples are PC-Chips M761LMRT and Asrock K7VM3.
7H4_D00D3 wrote:
That may be your experience, for me ASROCK works just fine, it's not the best brand by any means but if you're looking for something cheap that will do the job it's the perfect cost/effective choice....my granny doesn't need mad oveclocking options to check her mail....
Hmmm, not all products of any company are good. Neither are all products of some company bad. Its just the general perception (majority, that is). For once, I've never waited more than 2 secs for an ASUS, Gigabyte, MSI, Intel mobo to start POSTing. I've seen it happen only on ECS (Elitegroup), Chaintech (this must be an isolated case plaguing maybe only one model, they usu have good products), PC-Chips and Asrock (I haven't tried many Asrock mobos, just the K7VM3 broke the impression so I stopped recommending it to other people).
And regarding your granny not needing OCing options (many people don't need them), you're true, but a high-end mobo doesn't mean
only-and-only OCing options. And neither being a low-end (value) means stripping of those options. I have seen may value boards (e.g: MSI KM4M-L) which are quite quick to response (in fact installs standard XP pro in 16 minutes w/ Barton 2500+, 512MB and Seagate Barracuda 7200.7). Value board usually means micro ATX, lacking all those extra HDD, WiFi/bluetooth, FireWire and other controllers that some high-end motherboards have. Value boards usu only provide basic functionality (that is provided with the chipset). Low-end does mean I wouldn't get too many processors support (my MSI K8N Neo supports Turion S754, since its midrange, but not the budget ones), it means there wouldn't be as many onboard controllers, it means there will be lesser number of expansion slots, but nowhere does it imply it will have to be so poorly designed the components won't start synchronizing with each other even many seconds after startup.
Most probably not
all of the Asrock mobos suck. (I'm very much into individual testing and not to forming a general opinion about the whole group on the basis of one example, the only reason why I stopped buying Asrock is that there are so many other options on the market I could expose my customers to. Its not b/c of some bias against Asrock/Asus).
EDIT: Another hardware to avoid are
inno3D VGA cards. Although a bit inexpensive, and their good side is that they also write the memory channel width [like 'Geforce 6800GT (256-bit)'], I've found it most annoying that they tend to die in their 13th month of purchase. Although its good b/c it saves us warrantee hassles (we have 10 months warr here) and also fetches a new order, its against fair business practice and also agaimst Islamic teaching to sell something you know isn't as durable as the competitors. And I've noted it in all types of Inno3D cards, right from the Geforce 4 MX4000 to Gefroce 6800GT (we haven't got a 7-series back uptil now).