Henri Richard explains why AMD failed to gain more marketshare

Page 31 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

of the two of us you are the ignorant here,
1 you refuse to do the research
acting like a good GWBushian and doing as youre told just to save face
2 trying to evade intelligent debate on pressing matters referring to the educated as nutjobs

its the same lame rhetoric that simply broadens your backside for the protrusions of the elite so that you too may feel as if youre accepted among those moving to the money.

Youre ponity of view is insubstantial because you dont even know hoe it developed or what it is made of. Youre not you youre a paradigm
 

there again failure to make a point but offloading it to predetermined vocal conceptualization that endear you to your peer group.
no substance
no reality
no facts
nothing to back you up but a bunch of people predisposed to accepting a paradigm rather than intelligently navigating the rough waters to create your own.

Youre a puppet chad as are all of your peers, and the strings to your marionette azzes belong to the IMF , and that is made so in american law, youre a vocal representation of a corporate body , called a strawman, you dont know the details of your own captivity and you could care less because there is a crowd of sheep around you eating the same grass , uttering the same unevolved under read sounds, doing nothing but propping up your trust identity and believeing yourself to be autionomous and free.

That is the nutjob reality YOU need to be able to function, without that willingness to accept the role that you crafted inside the corporate box, you would be shattered from your own insecurities
 


And the truth outs, finally.

Didn't I say you were a plant from XCPU's only a few days ago? Maziar might have deleted that one by mistake however.

Now *we* see what you are. Good luck from now on now you've outed yourself as a member of that loser crowd. :lol:
 

No stoopid Jenny, you accused me of being from Xtreme Systems, although in your muddled mind you probably can't tell the difference between the two.

And I am hardly any kind of XCPU's regular, I only went there coz Jumping Jack posts there.
 
Ye right what a coincidence you starting to post here just after a whole lot of them got banned. :lol:

You're dealing with smart people here, not the usual idiots you are used to. FAIL.
 
Chad has always been abusive, it was clear from the start he was one of the xcpu crowd.

None of the mods did anything about it, but I guess now he's outed himself that will be that.
 
a mod needs to ban you for that personal sexual attack

thats libel dewd you just broke the law. Ill leave it at that since calling me a pedo is something you should do face to face, so i can correct you.

That being said you need that type of response because you dont know the facts and you still fail at representing your side of the truth by lack of evidence , just like the rest of you insane deniers.

I can prove what I say , all you can do is offer ridicule where facts should be. not only making your self look as shallow as you are but vain and malignantly narcissistic.
I didn't say you were a pedo, I'm just pointing out that there are a lot of crazies in this world who get so worked up defending irrational and illogical points of view, that me choosing not to waste my time with them, is no sign that their/your "view" is logically sound and that I am conceding defeat.


 

as i said if you want to make comparative insinuations do it face to face.
 

Ginny,

You are the most abusive person on this site, you are the last person who should be calling for the mods to ban people for being too abusive.

And as I am a recent member with fcuk all posts on xcpu, I am not a member of any crowd(except for the crowd that worships sanity).
 

You seem so wrapped up in wanting to see yourself as the Uber Philosopher/Truth seer, I wanted to point out to you that many weirdo's of all persuasions hold themselves in such esteem, and that just thinking this about yourself, doesn't mean you ain't off with the fairies and/or deeply disturbed.
 

still no facts no truth no proof no reality or sanity as all of those rely on each other.

Nothing
 


You came here 1 day after a bunch of the xcpu's people got banned, now you've just told Vern that you agree with what the xcpu's people said about him.

Don't lie anymore, loser. You lost it all by yourself because you broke the first rule of being a good liar, just like all liars do eventually.
 

Jen the idiot gave himself a perma face palm, id reccomend you dont follow in his steps
 


Well I sure hope so vern but you just never know here on THG.

I say anything and Mousemonkey bans me, yet people like Chad get to be abusive for weeks and never get a ban. It's bad enough they have to be outed as known troublemakers before anything happens.
 

Ginny,
Don't drink anymore.

I started a thread on XCPU's asking about Verndewd because I had no knowledge of why he fell out with XCPU.

If I was the XCPU insider you claim, I wouldn't have needed to do that.

And who from XCPU got banned from here anyway? How could their behaviour have been worse than yours?
 

Except that I haven't been outed as a "known troublemaker", that is just your idiotic interpretation and you have been abusive here for years and need to be perma banned.
 

its not that important, what is important is that people strive to resurrect some form of humanity in the day to day rather than deconstructing it with stupid prepackaged paradigms that are in fact historically fashioned to get people on a wavelength that suits those in control.
 


Lol amazingly enough that sounds a lot like what Sirheck kept on saying. He was one who got banned the day before you joined THG amazingly enough. 😗

I spotted the obvious ones a few weeks ago btw, I was just waiting on you making a mistake. Don't get me wrong, you are good - a lot better than most of the idiots from xcpu's.

In the end, you blew it. You showed signs of being unable to cope with pressure before today, in fact this whole thread has just been dragging you down ever since I posted those 2004 benchmarks. However, you suffer badly from pride and that will always be your downfall Chad.
 

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Keep dreamin and drinkin Ginny.

Why change a lifetime's worth of being wrong, huh?

Ginny,
What did SirHeck do to get banned that was any worse than your usual carry on?

Has your whinging got the mods feeling sheepish about banning/modding your ignorant arse, as you seem to get away with murder on this site.

And to correct your ignorance once again, I have a whole 39 posts on XCPU's, yet I am supposed to be some kind of XCPU insider. :lol:
 
Ye right, if you were going to stir up trouble why do it on your main account?

Maybe you did just get unlucky Chad...if so then tough luck I guess. You really shouldn't go all out vs one person (me), the day after a bunch of xcpu's posters get banned for a deliberate attempt to get me banned.

It was all going fine until you said..

Now I see why so many on XCPU's regard you as a nutjob.

You know that after only 39 posts there huh? I guess they talk about vern a lot for you to notice that with so few posts. Gee what a coincidence....just like you joining right after they all got banned. 😗

One of them I can accept sure. You joining immediately after *and* now admitting you frequent that forum *and* you know what they are saying about Vern - not to mention your pathetic vendetta against myself - yep.

You lost. Have fun on xcpu's with the rest of the losers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.