Im looking to get my first curved ultrawide 1440p monitor but I don't want to spend a huge amount of money so was looking at AOC, spotted these two which are almost identical besides refresh rates.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/aoc-...een-led-backlit-gaming-monitor-mo-05a-ao.html ~ £370
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/aoc-...een-led-backlit-gaming-monitor-mo-059-ao.html ~£450
Was hoping to make this a long term purchase and wanted to experience 144hz for the first time aswell so I'm willing to pay the £80 premium for the 144hz monitor. But after brief research around the topic I've seen that high refresh rates don't do well with low response times and that the "1ms" quoted is likely to be false on a VA panel. Not very educated on the subject so would this make the upgrade from 100hz to 144hz pointless/less worth the extra than I'd have thought?
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/aoc-...een-led-backlit-gaming-monitor-mo-05a-ao.html ~ £370
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/aoc-...een-led-backlit-gaming-monitor-mo-059-ao.html ~£450
Was hoping to make this a long term purchase and wanted to experience 144hz for the first time aswell so I'm willing to pay the £80 premium for the 144hz monitor. But after brief research around the topic I've seen that high refresh rates don't do well with low response times and that the "1ms" quoted is likely to be false on a VA panel. Not very educated on the subject so would this make the upgrade from 100hz to 144hz pointless/less worth the extra than I'd have thought?