How many FPS will I get with four of these cpu's?

[GadeEmbossed]

The cpu's are: E7-8894 v4

Game-debate.com only has up to E7-8895 v2 (and only one and it says about 830 fps in cs go) so what would I get with four of them? Thanks.

 

[Ecky]

CS:GO is not well threaded. Only ~2 cores will be used, the rest will sit idle, wasting power. So, with 4x 24 core, 48 thread CPUs, you'd have 94 idle cores and 190 idle threads.

More cores don't necessarily help if software doesn't use them for anything. A $60 Pentium G4560 would likely be faster.

 

[cryoburner]

No more than you would with one of them, and probably less than you would get with a single i7-7700k. Having 24 cores doesn't make any difference if the game only uses a few of them at most. : P

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

More of those CPUs won't get your any more FPS than just one. The game cannot utilize all of the cores/threads on one of those CPUs, so more of them won't help it any. So FPS would more depend on your GPU.

I'd be willing to bet you could get higher FPS with just one i7-7700K if using the same GPU. If you had tons of cash to spend on a system like that to play games with, an i7-7700K + GTX 1080 Ti or Titan XP (maybe 2 of them) would be a much better gaming system than multiple Xeons.

The i7 has much higher CPU speed and enough cores/threads which means it will be faster than the Xeon in gaming.

 

[GadeEmbossed]

More of those CPUs won't get your any more FPS than just one. The game cannot utilize all of the cores/threads on one of those CPUs, so more of them won't help it any. So FPS would more depend on your GPU.

I'd be willing to bet you could get higher FPS with just one i7-7700K if using the same GPU. If you had tons of cash to spend on a system like that to play games with, an i7-7700K + GTX 1080 Ti or Titan XP (maybe 2 of them) would be a much better gaming system than multiple Xeons.

The i7 has much higher CPU speed and enough cores/threads which means it will be faster than the Xeon in gaming.

Well how about battlefield 1 (On game-debate it has higher percentage with more cores)

 

[Ecky]

Battlefield 1 effectively uses ~4 cores and can gain some performance from having a few more, but anything past 8 hardware threads shows virtually no benefit.

 

[GadeEmbossed]

Battlefield 1 effectively uses ~4 cores and can gain some performance from having a few more, but anything past 8 hardware threads shows virtually no benefit.

Then why does game-debate say a ryzen r7 1800x have 181% on battlefield 1 but an E7-8895 v2 have 280% ?

 

[Gam3r01]

Because gamedebate is a joke most of the time.

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

More of those CPUs won't get your any more FPS than just one. The game cannot utilize all of the cores/threads on one of those CPUs, so more of them won't help it any. So FPS would more depend on your GPU.

I'd be willing to bet you could get higher FPS with just one i7-7700K if using the same GPU. If you had tons of cash to spend on a system like that to play games with, an i7-7700K + GTX 1080 Ti or Titan XP (maybe 2 of them) would be a much better gaming system than multiple Xeons.

The i7 has much higher CPU speed and enough cores/threads which means it will be faster than the Xeon in gaming.

Well how about battlefield 1 (On game-debate it has higher percentage with more cores)

I just looked at what you're talking about on game-debate. Just because the CPU has a higher percentage doesn't mean it will have better performance. If you were talking about GPUs, that would be a different story. When playing games, the CPU only processes what the GPU sends to it. If the GPU can't send it enough to utilize all 24C/48T, then they will not be utilized. Theoretically you would need about a dozen GTX Titan XPs to utilize that many cores/threads of just one of the 24 core Xeons. *But that's just in theory. Games would have to be specially programmed to take advantage of all that hardware.

 

[GadeEmbossed]

More of those CPUs won't get your any more FPS than just one. The game cannot utilize all of the cores/threads on one of those CPUs, so more of them won't help it any. So FPS would more depend on your GPU.

I'd be willing to bet you could get higher FPS with just one i7-7700K if using the same GPU. If you had tons of cash to spend on a system like that to play games with, an i7-7700K + GTX 1080 Ti or Titan XP (maybe 2 of them) would be a much better gaming system than multiple Xeons.

The i7 has much higher CPU speed and enough cores/threads which means it will be faster than the Xeon in gaming.

Well how about battlefield 1 (On game-debate it has higher percentage with more cores)

I just looked at what you're talking about on game-debate. Just because the CPU has a higher percentage doesn't mean it will have better performance. If you were talking about GPUs, that would be a different story. When playing games, the CPU only processes what the GPU sends to it. If the GPU can't send it enough to utilize all 24C/48T, then they will not be utilized. Theoretically you would need about a dozen GTX Titan XPs to utilize that many cores/threads of just one of the 24 core Xeons.

Ok so how would 10 gtx 1080 ti in sli do

 

[Gam3r01]

You cant use more than two cards.

 

[GadeEmbossed]

You cant use more than two cards.

Then explain this:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ccx1sYHUkAADBJl.jpg:large

 

[Gam3r01]

Are they gaming on that system?
No.

 

[GadeEmbossed]

Are they gaming on that system?
No.

Would that make a difference? Because I thought rendering didn't depend much on GPU

 

[Gam3r01]

Your question is asking about in game FPS.
Are you asking about gaming or rendering? Those are two vastly different things.

 

[GadeEmbossed]

Your question is asking about in game FPS.
Are you asking about gaming or rendering? Those are two vastly different things.

I am talking about gaming, why would you need 8 titan's in a render machine

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

The percentages on game-debate, especially CPU percentages, are theoretical. 2x GTX 1080 Ti in SLI still won't benefit anymore from a 24core Xeon than it would a 4 or 6 core i7. If you could run a game with like 12 GPUs, the Xeon could theoretically perform better than the 4 or 6 core i7. But like other's have said, games will not run with that many GPUs, so all that extra CPU power is useless when gaming.

That system with 8 Nvidia GTX GPUs is likely mining cryptocurrency, not gaming.

 

[Gam3r01]

Many programs are capable of GPU accelerated rendering or calculations. Its never been possible to use more than 4 cards for gaming, and since maxwell it has been limited to 2.

 

[GadeEmbossed]

Many programs are capable of GPU accelerated rendering or calculations. Its never been possible to use more than 4 cards for gaming, and since maxwell it has been limited to 2.

Ok thanks

 

[GadeEmbossed]

More of those CPUs won't get your any more FPS than just one. The game cannot utilize all of the cores/threads on one of those CPUs, so more of them won't help it any. So FPS would more depend on your GPU.

I'd be willing to bet you could get higher FPS with just one i7-7700K if using the same GPU. If you had tons of cash to spend on a system like that to play games with, an i7-7700K + GTX 1080 Ti or Titan XP (maybe 2 of them) would be a much better gaming system than multiple Xeons.

The i7 has much higher CPU speed and enough cores/threads which means it will be faster than the Xeon in gaming.

What if i told you the i7 chip is the exact same as a xeon but the xeon has more features, (this is a fact).

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

More of those CPUs won't get your any more FPS than just one. The game cannot utilize all of the cores/threads on one of those CPUs, so more of them won't help it any. So FPS would more depend on your GPU.

I'd be willing to bet you could get higher FPS with just one i7-7700K if using the same GPU. If you had tons of cash to spend on a system like that to play games with, an i7-7700K + GTX 1080 Ti or Titan XP (maybe 2 of them) would be a much better gaming system than multiple Xeons.

The i7 has much higher CPU speed and enough cores/threads which means it will be faster than the Xeon in gaming.

What if i told you the i7 chip is the exact same as a xeon but the xeon has more features, (this is a fact).

True. But one of those features is not higher clock speeds. None of the Xeon's features will give it an advantage over an i7 in gaming. For every Xeon there is, there is an i7 (soon to be i9) that will game better.

 

[GadeEmbossed]

ok well 3.7 and 3.8 ghz for the cheap xeons are still pretty good, close to 4ghz like a new i7

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

ok well 3.7 and 3.8 ghz for the cheap xeons are still pretty good, close to 4ghz like a new i7

True. They are still good and a good value *like the E3-1230 V5 and V6.