How much FPS gain?

Lungzie94

Commendable
Oct 16, 2016
32
0
1,530
How much FPS will I gain going from an i5 4460 to an i7 6700k?

this is my current build

i5 4460
H81M+ Mobo
8GB DDR3 Ram
1TB HDD
GTX 1070 8GB
Corsair VS 450 PSU

TO

i7 6700k
Z170 Pro
16GB DDR4 3000mhz RAM
1TB HDD
GTX 1070 8GB
EVGA 750 Gold G2 PSU
Samsung EVO 750 250GB SSD

How much FPS would I expect to gain?
 
Solution
Even if money is not an issue, the 4790K + 1080 is a more capable gaming machine than the 6700K + 1070. A new motherboard has some nice goodies, but nothing that will in any way affect performance, unless you hope to extract 10-15% more out of the CPU with overclocking, which honestly is very little.
Hit up gameGPU and look up the benches yourself.

Witcher 3 is an example of an uncommonly well threaded game and benefits from the i7's extra threads.

Ex:
w3_proZ.jpg
 

Lungzie94

Commendable
Oct 16, 2016
32
0
1,530
Basically, I want to know whether it's worth spending £700 to upgrade to get what 5-10 fps more, or go for a i7 4790k and spend the £200 saved on mobo and ram, on a GTX 1080 which will give 15-25fps more combimed with the I7

 

st3v30

Admirable


Yes that would be much better decision, also pick up aftermarket cooler for 4790k cuz that CPU can get really hot with stock cooler.
 

Lungzie94

Commendable
Oct 16, 2016
32
0
1,530
My problem with that is, it will be outdated within a year or so, and in actuality will cost the same as going for a full rebuild, but with much better mobo, ram cpu, etc just with a lesser GPU, which I can SLI at a later date.
 

spdragoo

Splendid
Ambassador


It won't be outdated. Note that on the chart @Ecky provided, the Sandy Bridge i7-2600K still managed to come out slightly ahead of the Haswell i5, despite its older architecture, because it had HyperThreading when the i5 didn't.

Plenty of other games released in the past year have shown the older Sandy Bridge & Ivy Bridge chips still able to keep up with the newer Haswell & Skylake chips -- DOOM (http://www.techspot.com/review/1173-doom-benchmarks/page5.html), Overwatch (http://www.techspot.com/review/1180-overwatch-benchmarks/page5.html), Titanfall 2 (http://www.techspot.com/review/1271-titanfall-2-pc-benchmarks/page3.html), Gears of War 4 (http://www.techspot.com/review/1263-gears-of-war-4-benchmarks/page4.html), Deus Ex: Mankind Divided (http://www.techspot.com/review/1235-deus-ex-mankind-divided-benchmarks/page5.html), Tom Clancy's The Division (http://www.techspot.com/review/1148-tom-clancys-the-division-benchmarks/page5.html), & Star Wars Battlefront (http://www.techspot.com/review/1096-star-wars-battlefront-benchmarks/page3.html) all show very close performance (not only between the older chips, but even between i5 & i7 chips), while even Rise of the Tomb Raider (http://www.techspot.com/review/1128-rise-of-the-tomb-raider-benchmarks/page5.html) & Fallout 4 (http://www.techspot.com/review/1089-fallout-4-benchmarks/page5.html) show the Haswell i7 chips keeping up handily with the Skylake i7s.

Bottom line, the number of games that can take advantage of the i7's HT advantage over an i5 are starting to increase, but the improvement is showing up across the board as opposed to just in the Skylake versions. Getting the GTX 1080 will absolutely raise your FPS, but getting a Haswell i7 for your build will also help provide better performance, & the two will provide much more of a boost than swapping for a Skylake CPU & motherboard.
 
Easily the 4790K. DDR4 has basically no practical advantage over DDR3, other than that it will likely be a little cheaper in the future as production continues to ramp up. Your motherboard will not affect performance at all, though I suppose you could justify spending an extra $500 if you feel it's worthwhile to get some USB 3.1 ports and an M.2 slot.
 

Lungzie94

Commendable
Oct 16, 2016
32
0
1,530
Thanks, I'd like to get more views on this before I pick a solution though, if money wasn't an issue, which build would you go for? would like some more people to post their opinions please
 
Even if money is not an issue, the 4790K + 1080 is a more capable gaming machine than the 6700K + 1070. A new motherboard has some nice goodies, but nothing that will in any way affect performance, unless you hope to extract 10-15% more out of the CPU with overclocking, which honestly is very little.
 
Solution

Lungzie94

Commendable
Oct 16, 2016
32
0
1,530
I know what you're saying but, to me it just doesn't make sense buying a 2013 CPU when I can get the 2016 better version for the same price, it's pretty much buying a PC from 2014, I really want to upgrade to the best possible. But if what you're saying about mobo and ram not affecting performance, it's kinda limbo here
 

Lungzie94

Commendable
Oct 16, 2016
32
0
1,530
Woah, I read up about i7 4790k and i7 6700k, and I think I'll go with the i7 4790k actually, been an eye opener. But what about the i5 6600k? apprently it's on par with the i7 4790k but £100 less but according to those graphs it's not?
 
It depends on what you're doing. i5's and i7's have the same single-threaded performance, but i7's have 4 more threads and ~30% more total throughput. A small but growing number of games, especially high-budget AAA titles, are capable of making good use of the i7's extra threads. Battlefield and The Witcher for instance run noticeably better on an i7 than an i5. However, an i5 is often considered the better value.
 
That'll be fine. You may want an aftermarker cooler, the 4790K is one of the only Intel CPUs in recent memory that may actually throttle with the cooler Intel provided with it. Something like a ~$25 Hyper212 would be more than adequate.
 
You're already at the top of the food chain with both CPU and GPU, there's not much else you can do that will have any meaningful impact in games. The only feature I'd miss is an M.2 slot and a nice NVMe SSD, but again, this will have zero impact on your framerates.