i3-8100 vs i3-8350k, does the 8350k max out on load?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Sep 27, 2018
58
0
130
I am going to build a new pc and i am thinking of bying an i3-8350k. I first thought of bying an i3-8100, but I prefer 8350k, because it has base 0.4ghz more, can be overclocked up to 5ghz and has +2mb cache memory. My friend told me that i should not buy i3 8350k because it is unlocked, which results in the cpu's cores maxing out on load. So, my questions are:
1) Do unlocked cores max out on load much easier than the locked ones?
2) Can the pc motherboard or/and its ram affect cpu's load?
3) Does the i3-8340k actually max out on load easier than the i3-8100?
4) Is Cryorig H7 (cooler) good enough for the i3-8350k

PC specs:
gpu : Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Motherboard: Z370 aorus gaming 5 (rev 1.0)
PSU : Corsair CX series CX650
HDD : Western Digital Blue 3.5" (7200 rpm)
Ram : HyperX Fury Black 8GB 2666 Ghz
Case : CoolerMaster MasterBox 5 (Window)



 


You'd thank yourself later for choosing the 8400 every time you start a game made in the last 5-6 years....; and BF1/5 currently struggle with only 4 threads....

If just office work/surfing, flip a coin....
 
"Future proof" is often misleading, because no one knows the future.

The GTX 1060 6GB was a good choice for future games 2 years ago when it was released. It was known as a solid 1080p 60fps ultra settings card.

It's certainly better than the 3GB version. The 6GB will likely provide a playable 60fps in upcoming titles with the right mix of settings.
 


Yes, you should always get dual-channel when performance is a concern. In the past it wasn't that big of a concern, but now dual-channel can make a 10% and even up to 20% difference in gaming performance depending on the game and the system.