I cant get both pretty cheap so i think imma choose the k version... even if i dont overclockIn CPU performance, they should be.
It wasn';t until IvyBridge that the "K" skus shipped with slightly higher base/boost clocks.
IIRC, the iGP front is a little different, with the 2600K getting HD3000(?) vs 2000 on the 2600.
The difference is pretty negligible though regardless.
Already looked at this link but wasnt sure if K has been overclocked on this link or not... imma get 2600k then thanksNope. See here:
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-2600K-vs-Intel-Core-i7-2600/621vs620
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/496/Intel_Core_i7_i7-2600_vs_Intel_Core_i7_i7-2600K.html
The 2600K is faster across the board, albeit the devil is in the details regarding why. Baseline performance from a user perspective would be nearly identical.
Thanks for the help imma get the faster one ofc since i can get them pretty cheap 60-100$The k has a slightly better igpu, but that's about it. I have both installed in systems and I can't tell the difference at stock clocks:
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/496/Intel_Core_i7_i7-2600_vs_Intel_Core_i7_i7-2600K.html
I've noticed the 2600k can be as much as 50% more than a non-k in used markets, so keep that in mind as well.Thanks for the help imma get the faster one ofc since i can get them pretty cheap 60-100$