IC Diamond Test Results

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
AII x3 435 @ 3770/1.5v
Sunbeam CCF-120 @ 1870 rpm


Pre-IC7
Compound: TX-2
Abient Temp:25
Idle Temp: 24
Load Temp: 40

IC7
Ambient Temp: 24.5
Idle Temp: 23
Load Temp: 39
 
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.63 GHz, 1.328 VCore
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme

IntelBurnTest v2.50, Stress Level: Maximum, Times to run: 10

Pre-IC Diamond 24 Carat

Compound: Arctic Silver 5

Ambient Temp: 30°C

Idle Temp:
Core 0 ····· 60°C
Core 1 ····· 54°C
Core 2 ····· 54°C
Core 3 ····· 54°C

Load Temp:
Core 0 ····· 86°C
Core 1 ····· 84°C
Core 2 ····· 86°C
Core 3 ····· 87°C


IC Diamond 24 Carat

Ambient Temp: 32°C

Idle Temp:
Core 0 ····· 57°C
Core 1 ····· 51°C
Core 2 ····· 51°C
Core 3 ····· 50°C

Load Temp:
Core 0 ····· 82°C
Core 1 ····· 80°C
Core 2 ····· 80°C
Core 3 ····· 80°C

A definite improvement over AS5.

Thank you Innovation Cooling.
 
Hi, I got my compound about a month ago but my mobo died on me so I had to wait until I got a replacement. I'll post up my results, hope its still relevant

CPU: Intel C2Q Q6600 G0 @3.8Ghz
Vid: 1.2125V
Vcore: 3.90 (in CPU-Z)
NB: 1.4V
HT/VTT: 1.52V
SB: auto

Pre-IC7
Compound: Coolermaster Thermal Fussion 400
Abient Temp: 27'C
Idle Temp: 46'C
Load Temp: 61'C

IC7
Ambient Temp: 27'C
Idle Temp: 45'C
Load Temp: 58'C

Improvement ~ 3'C avg across 4 cores @ load
 
@BaraCubra

Is it possible for you to reseat the NB heatsink on your P5N-D? Before I gave my P5N-D to my brother, I know that the NB temps would ALWAYS be around 75C (used nVidia System Tools) idle and like 80+C load, so I'd be very interested to see what the reduction would be over the stock Asus gunk.
 
Updating my charts this weekend and hit the 500+ user tests milestone. Raw data chart, haven't broken out he individual competition compounds yet, getting a little crowded. I will post the TH Update tomorrow

august212010multiforumtestresultsupdate.png
 
Lots of notebook repasting these days


http://forum.notebookreview.com/asus-gaming-notebook-forum/511600-my-repaste-experience-pics-success-2.html

From my post at notebookreview

In any event below chart is not final as all results are lumped together, GPU/CPU will be broken out on final.

What is interesting is I would categorize any improvements 10 C and over as catastrophic failure of the stock compound. I count 12 out of 42 roughly 25%

That's a real high number vs the standard PC which are more like 1-2%.

This would translate to early component failure, reduced life expectancy, increased returns/costs of owning a laptop etc.


August212010notebookreview.png
 
FINALLY got a chance to build my rig. Specs are: I7 940 - 2.93GHz, ASUS P6X58D-E, OCZ 700W Power Supply, Corsair H50, Storm Sniper case. Results:

Stock H50 Compound
Abient Temp: 27C
Idle Temp: 44C
Load Temp: 62C

IC7
Ambient Temp: 27'C
Idle Temp: 39C
Load Temp: 59C


A 5 degree drop during idle and a 3 degree drop under load. Very impressive. Thank you Innovation Cooling!
 



check your email -link to your result

looks like you improved contact on consecutive test s
 
I am not sure as to the sequence here so I assume the numerical is correct. I usually see worse to better and this sequence goes from just ok- to worse- to -better. Maybe Darshbag will show up and help explain.

Pressure is good but there is a bias to the left side, most contact/load appears to be on the edges with a kind of cupping if you will, inboard of the edges.

test1A-h50.png
 
This one is a well balanced mount, little bias east to west and north to south and good pressure. looks like the load is carried on the edges of the IHS and the IHS is a little concave so C/P is lighter inboard of the edges - hard to compress a rectangular square vertical edge.

test2B-h50.png
 
You can tell he went all out pressure wise on this test and increased pressure will give you better contact but it will not overcome a rigid edge. Still the one sided bias and I believe a lapped IHS might have made for an easier optimal install


test4-h50.png
 
Achieving a good mount on a CPU is awkward if IHS and sink are not in sync. In any event it does not get any better than what he got on his 5870. Smaller die so applied psi is higher, basically at 85 psi you are at the max resolution of the film so I suspect pressures are higher than that on a great portion of the chip, contact is great and about as close to ideal as you get.


test3-5870.png
 
I am putting together an intro for a C/P competition at overclockerstech.com and generated the attached charts from some forum user tests done awhile ago. I think they make a nice connection to the preceding C/P lab Report.


Technical/Troubleshooting Note:

As most experienced users understand that when troubleshooting thermal problems there are usually 3 areas of concern.

1.) Pressure
2.) Contact
3.) Application

Taking a thermal measurement on it's own is not enough without a relative basis of comparison. Application and use of thermal compound is a mechanical function though many electronically oriented people tend to attach little importance to mechanical measurements.

Every thermal compound has it's own unique ideal pressure/thermal performance curve. A highly liquid retail compound with great contact resistance will test well at low or moderate pressures as they hit their Bond line thickness (BLT) or average thickness relatively easily but since they are at optimum at these lower pressures adding more pressure fails to yield much of an improvement.

IC Diamond is of a much higher viscosity and has a very different pressure/ performance curve than a more liquid retail compound so at lower pressures and/or contact thermal results maybe equal or less. In paste reviews the major failure is in quantifying the mechanical aspects of what is being tested, are they @ 35lbs and 50% contact area? or 60lbs 60% contact? And how does that relate to multiple thermal/performance pressure curves of different compounds?

Note: 80% of sampled retail sinks were over 50lbs psi

Quantifying mechanical's is not realistic for the individual user but they get around that by observing multiple user results to mentally average a comparison unlike the individual anecdotal test they have a reference point(s) more or less like we are doing here providing samples for comparison.

I generated the attached charts Below from some forum user tests done awhile ago.

What they show is what most know already - that good C/P provides a good thermal result. What it also shows is that IC Diamond performance margins increase with over 50 psi force and with good contact margins are higher. Pressure is dominant and contact will increase with pressure.



It's not rocket science. Data point # 2 has weak pressure and poor contact resulting in a + 3.7C increase in temps over the liquid paste. Data point # 10 with great contact and pressure shows a -5C improvement over the more liquid compound. This is a nontrivial approx 9C spread and pretty well explains why people get different results.

Also observe Point # 6 it has a somewhat lower pressure but a higher contact hence the improved thermal

So to optimize your thermal result, apply enough compound, tighten your sink and do some lapping

CombinedchartCPvsthermalperformance.png


CombinedchartCPvsthermalperformance-2.png
 
Sorry for the tardiness but i've finally applied my IC Diamond to my cpu and gpu.
I7 860 2.93Ghz
Thermalright Mux-120
Chill Factor2 - 31.25 idle
" " - 53.75 load
IC Diamond - 29.25 idle
" " - 50.25 load
Prime95 15min at 100%
Measured using Core Temp.0.99.7

gpu XFX 5850 idle 33C
After IC Diamond applied 29C idle
Measure using GPU-Z 0.4.6
 
Here are the results I came up with if you still want them. This was tested on my brother in law's computer. Ambient temp was 74F in all tests. I can't remember what voltage was used.

Pentium Dual Core E2220 @3.0ghz
MASSCOOL 8W553B1M3 90mm Ball CPU Cooler
Thermaltake Tsunami Dream case


Cooler master thermal paste (included with my Hyper 212+)
Idle- 39C
Load- 74C

IC Diamond Paste
Idle- 38C
Load- 71C

From what I've seen this paste really shines on GPUs so I just might have to test it out on my GTX 460 next.
 
Final IC Diamond Test Results For Toms Hardware.

It is time to close this out and I would like to thank all those that participated in this IC Diamond field test, it is a lot of work mounting and remounting hardware and all were conscientious in their effort to doing a great job. Thanks to my buddy Shadow70379 for suggesting TH for a giveaway.

Tom's Hardware results were fairly consistent with the overall of 16 forums giveaways on a comparison basis with an average improvement of -3.87 C on a reported 54 results vs The gross average of -4.04 of the 16 forum 529 user test averages within .17C.

TH's had the largest group of GPU data reported to date, enough so I can start consolidating that segment and will edit this into the final report here

I have broken out the individual compounds in this test series and added them to the 16 forum overall and the multiforum breakout of individual compounds for a more in depth comparison.

Notes On Test Result Comparisons

When comparing results more credence should be given to larger sample sizes, smaller less so.

1-5 samples 1 or two tests can flip results either way so usually get thrown onto the miscellaneous group.

6-10 samples may start to indicate trends but can be heavily influenced by outliers and so are lightly weighted other than a general trend indicator

11-20 samples - Starting to develop more of a confidence in the trend direction.

20-30 samples - Confidence level improves.

30+ Samples - High degree of confidence


ALLFORUMTOTALSSEPT302010.png


sept30Tomshardwarefinalcpu.png


sept30TomshardwarefinalGPU.png


sept30Tomshardwarefinalcpulist.png


TOMSHARDWAREFINALCOMPOUNDBREAKOUT.png


Sept30condensedmultiforum.PNG


sept302010multiforumtestupdateICDiamondvsAS5.png


sept302010multiforumtestupdateICDiamondvsstockcompounds.png


sept302010multiforumtestupdateICDiamondvsTX2.png


sept302010multiforumtestupdateICDiamondvsceramique.png