Rambus has had over a year to prove itself, and it hasn't performed near what was expected. DDR has been few select computers for about two months on a few select platforms. Hasn't it performed very well in video cards?!?! The price will fall sometime in February, when large shipments begin. It will be cheaper than Rambus because it doesn't have as high of production costs as RIMMS. The cost right now is due to economics: there is a high demand and very little supply. The resellers would be fools not to make a grip on what they have...remember in America, we have that Captalism thing.
In regards to AMD delaying their chipset, who cares...I want the best product possible not a rushed incomplete product. This goes for Intel too, although I would never buy there over-priced...um...stuff.
As for the article on emulators, I am not a machine language programer, and neither of you said you were. But as I understand, and as it was reinterated by the author of the article on emulators, the people that know the true potential of a processor and the processors flaws are the machine language programers, they don't deal will the pretty side of programming. Yes there was a slight amount of bias in the article (AMD's stock is trading at 13 13/16 which was not mentioned) but the purpose of the article was not so much to build up AMD (he would have spend more time explaining why the T-Bird was so great if that was his purpose) but the purpose was to point out the glaring flaws and technological degression in the P4.
Anyways, please don't take anything I said too seriously, (No hate mail please, save that for DRPC, hehe). I am just happy that we can have this discussion.
Later
pill128
Take your PILL, and get some sleep.