warmon6
Splendid
[citation][nom]lashton[/nom]we wont see benchmarks because nvidia know the card is not as fast as the 5870 so they will wait for all the nvidia fan boys to buy it just to find out its a crap card, this is getting interesting though[/citation]
Actually, most companies with most of there products dont allowed review/hardware sites (like toms) to show benchmarks of unrealsed products till either the day before or day of release. There are rare times sites are allowed to release benchmarks early (like the core i7 980X benches).
to prove my point, look at Ati's HD 5870 bench marks almost 6 months back. you'll find the benches were release same day as the card were even though Ati could of told sites like tom's to release benchmarks to prove that the 5870 could beat the gtx 285 weeks earlier.
So with you saying that, It's like if you're saying for the 5870 before it was release, "we wont see benchmarks because Ati know the card is not as fast as the Gtx 285". Which is not the case.
Actually, most companies with most of there products dont allowed review/hardware sites (like toms) to show benchmarks of unrealsed products till either the day before or day of release. There are rare times sites are allowed to release benchmarks early (like the core i7 980X benches).
to prove my point, look at Ati's HD 5870 bench marks almost 6 months back. you'll find the benches were release same day as the card were even though Ati could of told sites like tom's to release benchmarks to prove that the 5870 could beat the gtx 285 weeks earlier.
So with you saying that, It's like if you're saying for the 5870 before it was release, "we wont see benchmarks because Ati know the card is not as fast as the Gtx 285". Which is not the case.