Intel FUD comes to tgdaily

[endyen]

Well, if Intel chooses to go head to head with the Sun Fire, here is the bar
If Intel can beat all of those by 20%, we have a horserace. If not, Intel should pack up thier DF and go work on thier chips.

 

[apache_lives]

ah poor amd fans - you all do remember what a fanboy is now (one who sticks by the company even if its crap etc)

hahaha

since we have all been paid of by amd fanboys for even hinting intel - they all deserve the same back for a year lol

enjoy

 

[MadModMike]

ah poor amd fans - you all do remember what a fanboy is now (one who sticks by the company even if its crap etc)

hahaha

lol you are funny, but you won Apache, BE GLAD!!

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

 

[apache_lives]

ah poor amd fans - you all do remember what a fanboy is now (one who sticks by the company even if its crap etc)

hahaha

lol you are funny, but you won Apache, BE GLAD!!

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

why thankyou MMM

 

[MadModMike]

ah poor amd fans - you all do remember what a fanboy is now (one who sticks by the company even if its crap etc)

hahaha

lol you are funny, but you won Apache, BE GLAD!!

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

why thankyou MMM

You're welcome Troll.

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time

 

[apache_lives]

Troll? wow that totally hurt please dont do that again mr amd fanboy

meh intels marketing devision can come up with better insults without even trying

 

[ltcommander_data]

Well, if Intel chooses to go head to head with the Sun Fire, here is the bar

Em, I thought that the X4200 was what Intel is comparing their Woodcrest against.

From the article that started this thread:

In the first head-to-head match-up for performance supremacy between AMD and Intel processors, staged by Intel, in quite some time, an AMD Opteron 64-based Sun Fire X4200 server running at 2.4 GHz, was placed against an example of a future HP ProLiant server running Intel's Woodcrest platform.

THG is supposed to be compiling the results right now so we will see how it turns out.

 

[mforce2]

THG is supposed to be compiling the results right now so we will see how it turns out.

We'll see how it turns out when Intel actually HAS a Woodcrest CPU HP can put in their servers . :lol:

 

[scubageek]

Wow, talk about total BS, and I am not talking about what Intel was shoveling.

I understand Fanboyism, but dang, you Intel twits take the cake.

Intel hasn't made a decent Processor in, what, 6 years, and you claim that when, as it looks, they finally do put out a decent processor it is going to kill everyone else??

Ehh, yeah, you need to rethink..

I love the fact Intel finally came out with a new Chip!

Honestly, that is going to make AMD come out with a better chip.

Anyone remember the race to 1ghz???

I do, that was an awesome time!

The last 6 years has allowed AMD to become a player, which I am glad they did, because it made Intel finally stop and think that if they didn't produce a quality product, that people would spend their money else where and Intel would lose out.

Anyone remember the cost of the P5-90 when it first was available?

I do, because a friend of mine built his first PC with it, $995 for that CPU, and remember, it had the floating decimal point error that caused problems...

Yeah, sorry, I do not EVER want to return to the days where 1 processor maker is king, NEVER!!

I like being able to get newer processors cheaper, even after 13 years.

Competition is great, lets hope both companies survive and both compete, if not, you won't see innovation like you are seeing now.

Remember how long it took to get from 386 to 486 to the P5?? That wasn't innovation, that was the 900 lb gorilla milking each new processor for as long as they could.

Now they can't do that, and that is a GREAT thing.

Let Intel have this time in the spotlight, make AMD rethink and reinnovate, better products is better for you and me..

As for me, I'll buy the best available for my money when I am ready to buy. I don't care if it is Intel or AMD...

 

[Guest]

Maybe you noticed by now but still

ICM = Intel Core Micro-Architechture, juste like NetBurst....

 

[Guest]

And here is why. First, when we look at all the announcements thus far, it becomes clear that there is little besides promises to back up the company's fresh wave of claims. Intel demonstrated that its new platform is running on notebooks, desktops, and servers alike. But we have yet to believe the company when it states that ICM architecture will deliver what Intel promises. Second, all product demonstrations compared a future product against processors that are available today. Especially in the case of the Woodcrest / Opteron showdown, we know that AMD is unlikely to stand still, and certainly will continue to improve the performance of its processor line. Intel's aiming at a moving target; in fairness, so now is AMD. But once the targets finally line up with one another, their real differences in terms of performance and power consumption therefore may not be as dramatic as Intel portrayed here at IDF.

Found that interesting quote on TGDaily =)