I've always been afraid of loosing my data so I have two disk mirrors (raid1 volumes) with 4 different Hard drives on my pc. Its worked like a charm for over a year.. however I just had not one but two drives fail (one for each volume thankfully not 2 on the same volume). My main os raid volumes status changed to "failed" and bootable "no" where as my extra storage volume became just "degraded" and bootable "yes" (though it can't boot as it has no os).
Now I got the replacement drives and I installed them in my pc but my main os RAID volume0 still has its status set in Intel Matrix Storage Manager (hit control +I at boot) to "bootable no" and "status failed" (Note: below I list exactly what I'm seeing in Intel Matrix Storage Manager v7.5.0.1017).
Now if I go into the bios and change the SATA config from RAID to IDE I can boot into the hard drive thats part of my os raid1 volume0 array just fine (ran check disk on it too and it checks out with no bad sectors). The problem is when I change it back to RAID in bios I can't get Intel Matrix Storage Manager to change it from Status "failed" and Bootable "no" to yes even though I've replaced the drive.
There is no option to change the volume to bootable or not.. The only options are as follows:
When I rebooted and entered the Intel Matrix Storage Manager, it gives the following 4 options:
1. Create RAID Volume
2. Delete RAID Volume
3. Reset Disks to Non-RAID
4. Exit
Under Disk/Volume Information, it shows this:
RAID Volumes:
ID -- Name ----- Level --------- Stripe ------ Size ------ Status ------ Bootable
0 --- OSDrive -- RAID1(Mirror) --- N/A ----- 931.5GB ---- Failed -------- No
1 --- Storage -- RAID1(Mirror) --- N/A ----- 1397.3GB -- Degraded ---- Yes
Physical Disks:
Port -- Drive Model ------ Serial # -- Size --------- Type/Status(Vol ID)
0 ----- <SEGATE Barracuda> --- <serial> -- 931.5GB --- Member Disk(0)
1 ----- <SEGATE Barracuda> --- <serial> -- 931.5GB --- Non-RAID Disk
4 ----- <SAMSUNG HD154UI> -- <serial> -- 1397.3GB --- Member Disk(1)
5 ----- <SAMSUNG HD154UI> -- <serial> -- 1397.3GB --- Member Disk(1)
How the heck do I fix this? I need my main os drive's redundancy back. 🙁
Thanks for your time.
Side note, seems to be the exact same problem this guy had here:
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/248283-32-intel-matrix-storage-boot-raid0-options
Now I got the replacement drives and I installed them in my pc but my main os RAID volume0 still has its status set in Intel Matrix Storage Manager (hit control +I at boot) to "bootable no" and "status failed" (Note: below I list exactly what I'm seeing in Intel Matrix Storage Manager v7.5.0.1017).
Now if I go into the bios and change the SATA config from RAID to IDE I can boot into the hard drive thats part of my os raid1 volume0 array just fine (ran check disk on it too and it checks out with no bad sectors). The problem is when I change it back to RAID in bios I can't get Intel Matrix Storage Manager to change it from Status "failed" and Bootable "no" to yes even though I've replaced the drive.
There is no option to change the volume to bootable or not.. The only options are as follows:
When I rebooted and entered the Intel Matrix Storage Manager, it gives the following 4 options:
1. Create RAID Volume
2. Delete RAID Volume
3. Reset Disks to Non-RAID
4. Exit
Under Disk/Volume Information, it shows this:
RAID Volumes:
ID -- Name ----- Level --------- Stripe ------ Size ------ Status ------ Bootable
0 --- OSDrive -- RAID1(Mirror) --- N/A ----- 931.5GB ---- Failed -------- No
1 --- Storage -- RAID1(Mirror) --- N/A ----- 1397.3GB -- Degraded ---- Yes
Physical Disks:
Port -- Drive Model ------ Serial # -- Size --------- Type/Status(Vol ID)
0 ----- <SEGATE Barracuda> --- <serial> -- 931.5GB --- Member Disk(0)
1 ----- <SEGATE Barracuda> --- <serial> -- 931.5GB --- Non-RAID Disk
4 ----- <SAMSUNG HD154UI> -- <serial> -- 1397.3GB --- Member Disk(1)
5 ----- <SAMSUNG HD154UI> -- <serial> -- 1397.3GB --- Member Disk(1)
How the heck do I fix this? I need my main os drive's redundancy back. 🙁
Thanks for your time.
Side note, seems to be the exact same problem this guy had here:
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/248283-32-intel-matrix-storage-boot-raid0-options