RichPLS
Champion
AMD with AM2 and DDR2 is slower, not faster than current 939 chipsets.
And Conroe at 2.66GHz, (not at 3.0GHz which will be released at launch), was compared with a future FX-62 (meaning not currently and faster than currently available) and AMD still lost.
What is unfair is Intel not using a $500 to $800 mainstream chip and comparing that to an overclocked FX chip that costs over $1100!
Is this so hard to understand?
And Conroe at 2.66GHz, (not at 3.0GHz which will be released at launch), was compared with a future FX-62 (meaning not currently and faster than currently available) and AMD still lost.
What is unfair is Intel not using a $500 to $800 mainstream chip and comparing that to an overclocked FX chip that costs over $1100!
Is this so hard to understand?