Intel Squeezes Six-core Processor Into 65 Watt Power Envelope

Status
Not open for further replies.

KyleSTL

Distinguished
Aug 17, 2007
1,678
0
19,790
+1 on the comment about using the archaic 1066FSB. Why? especially considering you're taking a performance hit on the memory by using FBDIMMS anyway.
 

DXRick

Distinguished
Jun 9, 2006
1,320
0
19,360
Being that server mobos already exist that can take two Xeon quad cores, I would presume the 6-cores are targeted at those that want 12-cores on a single server. Will they make a Skulltrail version too?
 

Mandrake_

Distinguished
Oct 7, 2006
355
0
18,780
These CPUs fit into the Caneland platform. They're for MP servers (i.e four or more sockets) and only support the 1066 FSB. The Clarksboro chipset would likely get too hot trying to run all four FSBs at 1333 or 1600.
 

dragoncyber

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2007
145
0
18,690
We used to think the Original Pentium Processor was insane too.
We used to think the 1 GHZ barrier was unreachable.(It took long enough)
I used to read articles in computer magazines and think.." WOW, 16mb of ram?!?!?..thats a beast!!

Soon we will be saying, "NewEgg has the best price on the new INTEL ANDROIDS, or we will supplement our own brains with Wet Wired processors, and hard drives..EX>> Johnny Neumonic..

People once thought the world was flat too.

We havent even broken the surface yet.
 

judgedredd

Distinguished
May 16, 2008
22
0
18,510
I am waiting on the HD upgrade for my brain since I am suffering from CRS often. =P

Yeah I remember selling 16mb of ram at $150 a pop per 4meg 30 pin simm and the guy going on and on how the prices have come down so much. Back when AMD was beating on Intel in the 486 market. Sold my Aunt a Pentium 90 and then Intel finally said the math coprocessor was jacked up and honoring swapping them out. Good times.
 

justjc

Distinguished
Jun 5, 2006
235
0
18,680
Is this really that impressive considering AMDs feat of making a 65w quad on 65nm technology? After all it's not unlikely that AMD will be able to do the same, if they chose to do so, when they change to 45nm.
 

treading

Distinguished
Aug 25, 2006
22
0
18,510
Back when AMD was beating out Intel in the 486 class both Cyrix and Nexgen were both faster. Cyrix got gobbled up by National Semi Conductor and AMD bought out Nexgen with the promise to bring out a pentium killer but just retired the engineers from nexgen. 16meg simms were $700 then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.