[citation][nom]Smochina[/nom]lol, and after the game will fail miserably sales wise, they will blame piracy of course. Some developers never learn, you do not build games for 'tomorrow' hardware, unless you are a stupid moron who doesn't want to sell his games.Let's take a look at Starcraft 2, it even runs on machines with onboard graphics cards. Wow, imagine that.[/citation]
Why, because people can't run it on max settings? Many people are more than happy with medium/high settings. Metro 2033 for example, I can't run it max as I don't have 3xGTX480 (single 5870) but it still looks better than most games on high (and even medium) settings. Mafia II will probably look just fine on less than max settings but if you happen to have an insane rig then you actually benefit visually from that hardware instead of just scoring 900fps which means nothing.
I think they guy with the E8400 and 5850 is right, his rig will probably perform well and look great while doing so. The minimum specs are a pentium D and a 3870, to think that any decent dual core rig with a high end (last gen) or mainstream card (this gen) will not make this game look good is just hating for no reason other than a spec sheet.
And yes, let's take a look at starcraft 2 because comparing a graphically minimalistic RTS to a highly detailed sandbox game makes so much sense. Just think, you only have to buy SC2 three times to play the whole game on your integrated chipset. Although I do hate their release model I will say Blizz art style is always top notch which gives their games long legs. Not a blizzard hater but screw this expansion pack BS.