Matrix games and alienware?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <1107453663.586665.176720@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
erikr@matrixgames.com says...

> > Rightly or wrongly, I walked away from that purchase with the feeling
> > that Matrix was one of those annoying companies that spends a lot of
> > time playing all the angles, trying to squeeze the last dollar out of
> > my wallet. In other words, a company that I tend to view very
> > sceptically whenever I deal with them.
>
> I hope that's not still the impression that you have, as it could not
> be further from the truth. Wargaming is a niche hobby and no one's
> getting rich doing this. For companies like you describe, in my
> opinion you need to look again at some of the more mainstream cookie
> cutter games.

Let me just put in my strong vote of preference *for* digital download,
for the following reasons:

(a) Digital download means no physical copy protection[1], which means
I can back up my software appropriately[2] and don't suffer a brain-
damaged performance hit. Oh, and I don't have to *pay* for the
privilege of not backing up the software.

(b) Digital download means no CD to drag around with my laptop; for
someone who goes on the road even seldomly, the importance of this is
incalculable.

(c) Digital download means I can buy the games I want when I want, and
play them immediately - rather than waiting for the UPS man ... or
praying that the game is ever available in the shitty outlets here in
Podunk.[3]

The main question I would ask those who prefer CD-based distos is, "What
- *exactly* - do you get with your CD that I don't get with my file?"
Manual? Nope, a .pdf with both, almost every time. A *box*? Whoopie,
another box to put in the attic. A little silvery CD? That's worth
exactly 10 cents, and it took me two minutes to produce this with the
same CDRW that everyone has.

The only possible reason I can think of to prefer a CD is if you're one
of those poor wretches who's stuck with a modem. To them I would say,
"Take your modem, put it with your 386, and join us in the 21st
century."


[1] License-based protection is fine, and untroubling to anyone who's
playing by the rules. Like me.

[2] Or extremely, if you're Frank. <g>

[3] I actually bought CAMPAIGNS ON THE DANUBE as a digital impulse-buy;
I was only marginally interested in the topic, but (a) the game was
inexpensive, (b) it was from a publisher I trusted, and (c) I could have
it in my hot little hands and be gaming in five minutes, on a weekend
when I needed a new game. So Matrix got $20 of my money *only because
of digital download*, and never would have made that Jackson with a CD.

--
Giftzwerg
***
"We have freedom now, we have human rights, we have democracy.
We will invite the insurgents to take part in our system.
If they do, we will welcome them. If they don't, we will
kill them."
- Rashid Majid, Iraqi voter
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

On 1 Feb 2005 18:51:23 -0800, "ERutins" <erikr@matrixgames.com> wrote:

>War In The Pacific (2 by 3) $69.99

Ding! Ding! Ding!
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:53:07 -0800, Frank E <fakeaddress@hotmail.com>
wrote:


>I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that that's an extreme
>example. 😛
>
>I've had it happen to me where backup CDs that I'd burned worked fine
>when I read them on that CD drive but when I upgraded computers I just
>couldn't restore the full disks without random errors. It wasn't a big
>deal at the time but if that had happened with my WitP backup after I
>bought a new computer last month, there would have been a lot of
>bitching and righteous indignation.
>
>Rgds, Frank

Yea, CDR's go bad over time.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"ERutins" <erikr@matrixgames.com> wrote in news:1107453663.586665.176720
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:

> Frank,
>
>> Ya know, if that had been made plain to me when I downloaded WitP, I
>> would have had a different attitude about the whole thing.
>
> Yeah, we need to make that more clear. FYI, I don't know when you had
> this experience, but we have added more explanation to the store since
> and I know that the 30 day limit is explained now.
>
>> No mention was made about contacting Matrix, no mention was made
> about
>> having 30 days in case something went wrong. As a matter of fact, I'm
>> pretty sure you're wrong about that one, seems like the people I
>> downoladed from went out of their way to explain that I couldn't
>> download more than once unless I paid the $5.
>
> With respect, I know I'm right about that and that has always been the
> case, but it was no doubt not explained clearly.

This once again shows how important communication is - it's not enough
having the right product, it's equally important to make sure your
customers have a smooth buying experience - that is, one where every
doubt or question that could arise is answered right then and there.

Erik, thanks for taking the time to clear this matter up (1) - it's very
nice to see the big publisher listening to the concerns of the little
grunts down in the trenches (2) - much appreciated.

Ok, guys, time to lower the 88mm flak gun (3)

[we may be little grunts, but we pack heavy gear in case publishers
*aren't* listening]


Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx

(1) - I always wanted to footnote one of my posts - looks nice from here
(2) - look mum, did it again !
(3) - in reference to the thread a couple months ago on
"developers/publishers not visiting war-historical for fear of getting
caught in the flak" - boy, was I wrong back then ...
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <g6b5011u27r132d6mic78tmn1aat5r7vv9@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
says...

> Yea, CDR's go bad over time.

Hmmm. You're going to "go bad" at some point, you know[1].

Studies on CDR longevity have been somewhat equivocal, but data and
personal experience suggest that a reasonable figure for good-quality
dyes with careful storage and minimal tending is somewhere between 10
and 100 years.

Given the constant motion of the state of the art in computer hardware,
the true threat to the viability of a backup medium isn't the longevity
of the media, but the likelihood of having the hardware around to read
that CDR that survives for 50 years in 2055.

What this means is that backup is an ongoing, evolving process. We
don't need the CDR to survive any longer than the drive that reads it.
We won't need the DVR to extend beyond its hardware viability. What we
do need to do is continually update our backup strategies such that our
backups are always being written to media with *sufficient* longevity in
a medium with *sufficient* viability.

In other words, I really don't care if the 150MB cartridge tapes locked
in a media closet at work will work, because I transferred the
information on them to DAT six years ago. Down the road, I won't care
if I can read the DATs, because I'll have transferred the information to
<fancy new backup tech here>.

[1] I liked the phrase my ophthalmologist used; "Our goal here is for
you to die with the vision you have now." It's perfectly applicable to
data backups.

--
Giftzwerg
***
"So these Sunnis complain that the [Iraqi] election is illegitimate
because they boycotted it. The obvious comparison is to the child
in the classic definition of *chutzpah*, who kills his parents and
pleads for mercy because he's an orphan."
- James Taranto
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <53b5019rfp8gh1p4aqrpav70c3koavfe65@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
says...

> >War In The Pacific (2 by 3) $69.99
>
> Ding! Ding! Ding!

More like "ding-dong," to cherry-pick a single title - and one
manifestly *not* characteristic of the other titles - as interesting in
any way.

A better way to approach this list of titles and prices is the obvious
one, and we find that the average price for a Matrix product is $31.29,
really rather a reasonable and supportable figure, by anyone's
yardstick.



--
Giftzwerg
***
"So these Sunnis complain that the [Iraqi] election is illegitimate
because they boycotted it. The obvious comparison is to the child
in the classic definition of *chutzpah*, who kills his parents and
pleads for mercy because he's an orphan."
- James Taranto
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:09:32 -0500, Giftzwerg
<giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote:


>Studies on CDR longevity have been somewhat equivocal, but data and
>personal experience suggest that a reasonable figure for good-quality
>dyes with careful storage and minimal tending is somewhere between 10
>and 100 years.

I've seen CDR's go bad after only a few months of use, The surface of
CDR's and CDRW's is quite delicate.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:22 -0500, Giftzwerg
<giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote:


>More like "ding-dong," to cherry-pick a single title - and one
>manifestly *not* characteristic of the other titles - as interesting in
>any way.
>
>A better way to approach this list of titles and prices is the obvious
>one, and we find that the average price for a Matrix product is $31.29,
>really rather a reasonable and supportable figure, by anyone's
>yardstick.

Most of them are budget fodder not worth ten bucks.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

It's me wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:22 -0500, Giftzwerg
> <giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> >More like "ding-dong," to cherry-pick a single title - and one
> >manifestly *not* characteristic of the other titles - as interesting
in
> >any way.
> >
> >A better way to approach this list of titles and prices is the
obvious
> >one, and we find that the average price for a Matrix product is
$31.29,
> >really rather a reasonable and supportable figure, by anyone's
> >yardstick.
>
> Most of them are budget fodder not worth ten bucks.

LOL - really ? - how strange - you're probably in a minority on this,
but don't let that stop you in giving us the full list of Matrixgames -
remember you said "most" :) that you consider not worth $10. I sure
hope BiN and HTTR are not on that list because that would really be a
howler.

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <aps7011ss8tpv6hels0thgrhubiue0fakh@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
says...

> >Studies on CDR longevity have been somewhat equivocal, but data and
> >personal experience suggest that a reasonable figure for good-quality
> >dyes with careful storage and minimal tending is somewhere between 10
> >and 100 years.
>
> I've seen CDR's go bad after only a few months of use, The surface of
> CDR's and CDRW's is quite delicate.

So what? Nobody *uses* a backup. Backups are carefully stored in case
they're needed.

--
Giftzwerg
***
"So these Sunnis complain that the [Iraqi] election is illegitimate
because they boycotted it. The obvious comparison is to the child
in the classic definition of *chutzpah*, who kills his parents and
pleads for mercy because he's an orphan."
- James Taranto
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <6ts701dph57ae0eq9j0t2e99tbtu46ra6s@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
says...

> >More like "ding-dong," to cherry-pick a single title - and one
> >manifestly *not* characteristic of the other titles - as interesting in
> >any way.
> >
> >A better way to approach this list of titles and prices is the obvious
> >one, and we find that the average price for a Matrix product is $31.29,
> >really rather a reasonable and supportable figure, by anyone's
> >yardstick.
>
> Most of them are budget fodder not worth ten bucks.

After a statement like this, your argument isn't worth ten cents.

--
Giftzwerg
***
"So these Sunnis complain that the [Iraqi] election is illegitimate
because they boycotted it. The obvious comparison is to the child
in the classic definition of *chutzpah*, who kills his parents and
pleads for mercy because he's an orphan."
- James Taranto
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <6ts701dph57ae0eq9j0t2e99tbtu46ra6s@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
says...
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:32:22 -0500, Giftzwerg
> <giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> >More like "ding-dong," to cherry-pick a single title - and one
> >manifestly *not* characteristic of the other titles - as interesting in
> >any way.
> >
> >A better way to approach this list of titles and prices is the obvious
> >one, and we find that the average price for a Matrix product is $31.29,
> >really rather a reasonable and supportable figure, by anyone's
> >yardstick.
>
> Most of them are budget fodder not worth ten bucks.

I think Matrix has some very good wargames. They're my favorite wargame
company.

You know, they don't do any different than any other company on this
earth. They set the price where they think they'll make the most money.
Whether that's a high price or low.
--
Epi

Armstrong Williams was just the tip of the iceberg,
Rush is the iceberg.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

Giftzwerg wrote:
> In article <aps7011ss8tpv6hels0thgrhubiue0fakh@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
> says...
>
>
>>>Studies on CDR longevity have been somewhat equivocal, but data and
>>>personal experience suggest that a reasonable figure for good-quality
>>>dyes with careful storage and minimal tending is somewhere between 10
>>>and 100 years.
>>
>>I've seen CDR's go bad after only a few months of use, The surface of
>>CDR's and CDRW's is quite delicate.
>
>
> So what? Nobody *uses* a backup. Backups are carefully stored in case
> they're needed.

I remember some test about CDRs and according to that some disks lost
data quite fast without anyone physically damaging them. I understood
that disks were stored away and when they were taken out for new test
some were totally gone, some had little problems reading data. I think
proble was with dye used in them or something?

For this some hobby digital photographers take two or three copies of
their photos to different brands of disks. Same can be used for all kind
of data.

I have my backups so that I have one 160GB USB drive that I use just for
backup, then somewhat current stuff stays on my laptop until I need more
space, and then for downloaded games etc. I burn them to CDs also. And
as extra I have copy also on my brothers machine where I need to copy
photos anyway because many of them are about his daughter :)

But I don't feel any sympathy for person who doesn't have their
downloaded games or other valuable data at least on two different media.
USB disks area easy and quite cheap. CDRs are also cheap, but I wouldn't
rely on them only ..or at least single copy and/or single brand.



--
jari k

remove unnecessary parts of address to make it work
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <cu24cj$1pj$1@epityr.hut.fi>, jari k
<email.is:Jari.Kujansuu@hut.fi.invalid> says...

> >>I've seen CDR's go bad after only a few months of use, The surface of
> >>CDR's and CDRW's is quite delicate.
> >
> >
> > So what? Nobody *uses* a backup. Backups are carefully stored in case
> > they're needed.
>
> I remember some test about CDRs and according to that some disks lost
> data quite fast without anyone physically damaging them. I understood
> that disks were stored away and when they were taken out for new test
> some were totally gone, some had little problems reading data. I think
> proble was with dye used in them or something?

I've heard that, too. Specifically, there used to be a silver foil with
a sort of greenish dye-cast to it, and this was notorious for failing.
My understanding is that this isn't used any longer.

I'd also heard that some stick-on paper labels were found to react with
the foil and cause lossage. I always just use a Sharpie to write on the
disks, so I have no experience with this.

> But I don't feel any sympathy for person who doesn't have their
> downloaded games or other valuable data at least on two different media.
> USB disks area easy and quite cheap. CDRs are also cheap, but I wouldn't
> rely on them only ..or at least single copy and/or single brand.

Agreed. In times past, backing up home systems was a nightmare;
floppies were too small and failed at the drop of a hat, hard disks were
expensive, tape systems were out-of-control expensive, and networking
was something for Big Iron.

But now? It's never been so cheap or so convenient for even the
lowliest home user to implement an effective backup scheme. The last
external hard disk I bought even had a "one-touch" backup routine
accessible from the single Big Button on the front of the case. Five
minutes of setup, and you can back up all your data files just by
pressing a button. Even if you want to go with tape, you can pick up a
nice Sony DAT for about $350.

There's just no excuse anymore.

--
Giftzwerg
***
"So these Sunnis complain that the [Iraqi] election is illegitimate
because they boycotted it. The obvious comparison is to the child
in the classic definition of *chutzpah*, who kills his parents and
pleads for mercy because he's an orphan."
- James Taranto
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 18:42:19 -0500, Giftzwerg
<giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote:


>So what? Nobody *uses* a backup. Backups are carefully stored in case
>they're needed.

"CDRs are also cheap, but I wouldn't
rely on them only ..or at least single copy and/or single brand."

Ditto.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

On 4 Feb 2005 15:20:38 -0800, "eddysterckx@hotmail.com"
<eddysterckx@hotmail.com> wrote:


>LOL - really ? - how strange - you're probably in a minority on this,
>but don't let that stop you in giving us the full list of Matrixgames -
>remember you said "most" :) that you consider not worth $10. I sure
>hope BiN and HTTR are not on that list because that would really be a
>howler.
>
>Greetz,
>
>Eddy Sterckx

No, those two are not on the list, nor Uncommon Valor. WIP is too rich
for my wallet and I doubt I would like it any way. The rest of their
stable don't interest me.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <c1ha015v239lcv0p9m4beu8f9oqj1h6nuj@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
says...

> >LOL - really ? - how strange - you're probably in a minority on this,
> >but don't let that stop you in giving us the full list of Matrixgames -
> >remember you said "most" :) that you consider not worth $10. I sure
> >hope BiN and HTTR are not on that list because that would really be a
> >howler.

> No, those two are not on the list, nor Uncommon Valor. WIP is too rich
> for my wallet and I doubt I would like it any way. The rest of their
> stable don't interest me.

Hmmmm. What is your point, again?

--
Giftzwerg
***
"You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around
for five years because they didn't wear a veil. You know, guys
like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of
a lot of fun to shoot them."
- Lieutenant General James Mattis, USMC
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <c1ha015v239lcv0p9m4beu8f9oqj1h6nuj@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
says...
> On 4 Feb 2005 15:20:38 -0800, "eddysterckx@hotmail.com"
> <eddysterckx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> >LOL - really ? - how strange - you're probably in a minority on this,
> >but don't let that stop you in giving us the full list of Matrixgames -
> >remember you said "most" :) that you consider not worth $10. I sure
> >hope BiN and HTTR are not on that list because that would really be a
> >howler.
> >
> >Greetz,
> >
> >Eddy Sterckx
>
> No, those two are not on the list, nor Uncommon Valor. WIP is too rich
> for my wallet and I doubt I would like it any way. The rest of their
> stable don't interest me.

So, don't buy them then. Is someone holding a gun to your head? If so,
that's probably a pretty good marketing strategy.

--
Epi

Armstrong Williams was just the tip of the iceberg,
Rush is the iceberg.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Giftzwerg" <giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c6dd2628d1d784298a172@news-east.giganews.com...
> In article <aps7011ss8tpv6hels0thgrhubiue0fakh@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
> says...
>
> > >Studies on CDR longevity have been somewhat equivocal, but data and
> > >personal experience suggest that a reasonable figure for good-quality
> > >dyes with careful storage and minimal tending is somewhere between 10
> > >and 100 years.
> >
> > I've seen CDR's go bad after only a few months of use, The surface of
> > CDR's and CDRW's is quite delicate.
>
> So what? Nobody *uses* a backup. Backups are carefully stored in case
> they're needed.

I didn't backup install cd's until I dropped and then stepped on one. Since
then I use an install disk once, to install a game and make a backup. If the
game needs the cd in the drive the backup is the one I use. The original is
the one safely packed away. For those games that I can't make backups of, I
expect to wear out the disk after so many hundreds of hour of use, and
either have mutilple copies that I bought or expect to stop playing it
eventually.

I currently backup to dvd+R and am testing how well they stand up to
storage. CDR's have already failed here in less than 5 years of storage. In
the past I have used thru the years:
audio cassettes
8 in floppy
51/4 in floppy
3.5 in floppy
qic tapes
zip disks
cdr
cdrw
dvdr
dvdrw

For ease of use nothing beats a dvdrw, I can just drag and drop files across
my network to the comp with the dvdwriter and back up files as needed. The
current leader in price/storage is dvdr.

Despite the claims that it is long term storage the only drive I don't still
have hooked up anymore is the qic drive, too slow, too expensive and I never
liked how they worked under win9x instead of dos.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Giftzwerg" <giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c6d21f55dd07e7e98a16b@news-east.giganews.com...
> In article <g6b5011u27r132d6mic78tmn1aat5r7vv9@4ax.com>, me@here.noemail
> says...
>
> > Yea, CDR's go bad over time.
>
> Hmmm. You're going to "go bad" at some point, you know[1].
>
> Studies on CDR longevity have been somewhat equivocal, but data and
> personal experience suggest that a reasonable figure for good-quality
> dyes with careful storage and minimal tending is somewhere between 10
> and 100 years.
>
> Given the constant motion of the state of the art in computer hardware,
> the true threat to the viability of a backup medium isn't the longevity
> of the media, but the likelihood of having the hardware around to read
> that CDR that survives for 50 years in 2055.
>
> What this means is that backup is an ongoing, evolving process. We
> don't need the CDR to survive any longer than the drive that reads it.
> We won't need the DVR to extend beyond its hardware viability. What we
> do need to do is continually update our backup strategies such that our
> backups are always being written to media with *sufficient* longevity in
> a medium with *sufficient* viability.

Or you mothball equipment along with your media so that both are available
when needed. I still have 8 in floppy drives here to handle the boxes of 8
in disks I have stored away.
>
> In other words, I really don't care if the 150MB cartridge tapes locked
> in a media closet at work will work, because I transferred the
> information on them to DAT six years ago. Down the road, I won't care
> if I can read the DATs, because I'll have transferred the information to
> <fancy new backup tech here>.

This strategy might work if there is no loss of information in the transfer
and you complety migrate the data before you hardware fails. Ask me sometime
about the beta format tapes I still have packed away somewhere waiting for
the day that I can find a cheap beta format vcr to move them over to digital
video. Note I didn't say to vhs video, currently I use a video cap card to
function as my vcr, I no longer use video tape (except to store the 1000's
of hours of video I already have).
>
> [1] I liked the phrase my ophthalmologist used; "Our goal here is for
> you to die with the vision you have now." It's perfectly applicable to
> data backups.

You might be surprised at the retro computer fans that go so far as build
their own paper tape readers to read 1960's era paper tape and users of
audio cassette storage who create .wav files of their tapes and use sound
cards to simulate cassette players.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

Giftzwerg wrote:

> A dozen years ago, the IRS imperiously[1] summoned me for an audit.
> When I arrived at the appointed hour, bright as a new penny, the
auditor
> gruffly demanded that I produce any and all records pertaining to my
> 19xx tax filings.
>
> I told him, "You have them, already."
>
> He replied, "Apparently you don't understand. You're being audited."
>
> To which I responded, "I was working as a cop that year, and you have
my
> W-2. I didn't itemize a single deduction. I filed Form 1040-EZ.
> That's my 'documentation.' All. Of. It. Are we about done here?"
>
> We were.

I'll up you one here :)

On our tax forms you can leave a telephone number where the IRS can
reach you during business hours - one day they phoned and a young
female voice asked me why I hadn't provided a certain item while I had
put in a specific deduction.

I carefully explained to her the tax-law governing that item didn't
require it in this particular instance - she was mighty pleased that
someone actually took the trouble of carefully explaining the tax-laws
to her and asked a bunch of other questions unrelated to my tax return.
She confessed that she was too scared to tell her boss she didn't
understand any of it ... and she was supposed to audit people ... and
you wonder why we have a budget deficit ...

[and yeah, I nearly asked her out - but she never called back - sniff]

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Giftzwerg" <giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c6ac1163043c69498a162@news-east.giganews.com...
> Speaking for myself, important files - as well as relatively unimportant
> stuff like my installation copy of CAMPAIGNS ON THE DANUBE - get
> mirrored on a RAID, hot-backuped on an additional hard disk, copied to a
> server, archived to tape, archived to DVD, archived to CD, and copies of
> the tape, DVD, and CD are all stored off-site. I'm not sure what kind
> of cataclysm it would take to simultaneously destroy all the copies of
> my 2002 tax records ... and I don't intend to find out.
>

You know, that actually sounds like a pretty interesting game idea:

Destroy Giftzerg's Tax Returns -- a new game from Matrix Games!

Maybe "Return Raiders"?? "CPA Commandos"?? "Tax-Time Terror"???

🙂

Tom
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <110i39edeie4kce@corp.supernews.com>, ruschak@wintek.com
says...

> > Speaking for myself, important files - as well as relatively unimportant
> > stuff like my installation copy of CAMPAIGNS ON THE DANUBE - get
> > mirrored on a RAID, hot-backuped on an additional hard disk, copied to a
> > server, archived to tape, archived to DVD, archived to CD, and copies of
> > the tape, DVD, and CD are all stored off-site. I'm not sure what kind
> > of cataclysm it would take to simultaneously destroy all the copies of
> > my 2002 tax records ... and I don't intend to find out.
> >
>
> You know, that actually sounds like a pretty interesting game idea:
>
> Destroy Giftzerg's Tax Returns -- a new game from Matrix Games!

> Maybe "Return Raiders"?? "CPA Commandos"?? "Tax-Time Terror"???

A dozen years ago, the IRS imperiously[1] summoned me for an audit.
When I arrived at the appointed hour, bright as a new penny, the auditor
gruffly demanded that I produce any and all records pertaining to my
19xx tax filings.

I told him, "You have them, already."

He replied, "Apparently you don't understand. You're being audited."

To which I responded, "I was working as a cop that year, and you have my
W-2. I didn't itemize a single deduction. I filed Form 1040-EZ.
That's my 'documentation.' All. Of. It. Are we about done here?"

We were.

[1] Redundant, I realize...

--
Giftzwerg
***
"This really is the future I wanted. Although I expected
longer battery life."
- James Lileks
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:09:26 -0500, Giftzwerg
<giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote:

>The only possible reason I can think of to prefer a CD is if you're one
>of those poor wretches who's stuck with a modem. To them I would say,
>"Take your modem, put it with your 386, and join us in the 21st
>century."

Aww, now that's just cruel - kinda like every month when I go to the
Sprint website to pay my phone bill online, and they have this little
button that says, "Click here to see if Sprint DSL is available where
you live," but whenever I click it the answer is always, "Not yet!"

John

yeah, so I'm catching up on reading old posts, so sue me
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

John Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:09:26 -0500, Giftzwerg
> <giftzwerg999@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >The only possible reason I can think of to prefer a CD is if you're
one
> >of those poor wretches who's stuck with a modem. To them I would
say,
> >"Take your modem, put it with your 386, and join us in the 21st
> >century."
>
> Aww, now that's just cruel - kinda like every month when I go to the
> Sprint website to pay my phone bill online, and they have this little
> button that says, "Click here to see if Sprint DSL is available where
> you live," but whenever I click it the answer is always, "Not yet!"

You could always move :)

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx

> yeah, so I'm catching up on reading old posts, so sue me

It took the posts *that* long to get through your modem ??? - man, I
pity you :)