"I choose it because it's easier to use on a pc. Yes I'm familiar with it but it also makes more sense then pictures ment for touch screens. The prblem here is that MS is, as always, still out f touch with it's customers."
Hmm. Some thoughts here. I would choose the start button too. I ran 8 early in the beta trials in a VM on a 7 machine. It ran pretty snappy in a VM BTW. I develop content using multiple monitors. the 8 interface is not practical for me for my dev environment.
However from the average user's point of view, (this excludes you and I "developers"), using the Win8 interface makes more sense especially for touch interfaces. The average user wants to look at pics, view the internet, check email and socialize. This interface makes more sense for those users. The start button did not. Computers are fundamentally supposed to make life easier. For most users 8 interface makes much more sense.
So your comment "The prblem here is that MS is, as always, still out f touch with it's customers." is really just about you. I think 8 will be met with success once all the neigh-sayers shut up and give it some time. I read so many terrible reviews about 8. Note that some are recanting even now after using it for a month or so.
Hell I'm still running a Vista machine that I have never had trouble with (mainly because I waited for SP1) This is my mission critical work dev machine (Design engineering). Remember how bad Vista's reviews were?
I believe Microsoft is in fact thinking of the masses here. Getting in touch with the true users. Windows needed to "Start" over with the user interface. And this is a decent start.