My 3DMark2001 score

AMD_Man · Jan 17, 2002

OOOOOOOO, I'm sure where to get an artifact tester, but may I know your system specs, specifically, the CPU and graphics card?

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the ULTIMATE PC processor

Guest · Jan 17, 2002

Yeah. I have an Axp 1800+ (1533Mhz). I actually did numerous changes in BIOS. I can post a log I created. It shows every step I took in taking my computer (which started out scoring less than 7500) up to 9000.

In on of my previous posts I mentioned that for whatever reason my CPU runs at 61C full load while my case is only 28C full load. When I OC it only goes up to 63C full load.

I'm currently clocked to 1656Mhz (my FSB is 144Mhz, currently the highest it can be without my CPU being throttled). I'm using 2 Crucial PC2100 256MB dimms on an Asus A7V266-E mobo (set to the 7ns setting). My video is a Radeon 8500 OCed to 295 processor, 295 memory.

*****

That's what you get for buying your computer based on color. :redface:

Guest · Jan 17, 2002

Tonight when I get home from work, I'll post my score and I'll also put up that log. Once I get the artifact tester, I may try to put the video a little higher, and if I can get my CPU cooler I know I could OC more as my PCI bus is stable at least until 148Mhz, but my CPU starts getting throttled/reboots (depending on BIOS setting) under full load at any bus higher than 144.

*****

That's what you get for buying your computer based on color. :redface:

AMD_Man · Jan 17, 2002

Ahh, I see, your system is significantly faster than mine. With a 143MHz FSB(the highest stable bus speed I can get with my RAM, but I might get RAMsinks for an improvement) and an Athlon clocked at 1.36GHz and a Radeon 8500 at 300/300, I get about 8000points in 3DMark2001.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the ULTIMATE PC processor

Guest · Jan 17, 2002

BTW, am I missing something or is there no way to set my FSB and my memory clock asynchronously on the A7V266-E?

*****

That's what you get for buying your computer based on color. :redface:

Guest · Jan 17, 2002

So you had no problem getting your Radeon up to 300/300? Everything look good?

I assume you're not using heat spreaders on that RAM? If not I should be able to get that high as my case temp is so cool.

*****

That's what you get for buying your computer based on color. :redface:

Guest · Jan 18, 2002

Okay, here is my 3D Mark score: <A HREF="http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2487478" target="_new">http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2487478</A>

Also, here is a log I kept of all the changes I made and their effects. Please give me suggestions for further improvement (besides further OCing of the video card which I plan on doing anyway).

startup score with all basic drivers (ati driver v.8500.6.13.10.3286): 7593

After K7 patch from windows update: 7544

After switching memory to 7ns (CAS2): 7708

After setting 64MB Graphics Aperture (from 32MB): 8401

After 128Graphics Aperture: 8374

Reset aperture to 64MB.

After OC to 138MHz FSB: 8489

After OC to 143MHz FSB: 8659

After OC to 144MHz FSB: 8700

After installing Powerstrip: 8695

After OC to 281.25Mhz vid Mem clock (5 mhz): 8729

After Oc to 281.25Mhz vid core clock (5mhz): 8803

After OC both vid clocks to 285.75: 8876

After OC both vid clocks to 290.25: 8954

After OC both vid clocks to 294.75 (20Mhz OC total): 9042

AMD: Join the rebellion!

AMD_Man · Jan 18, 2002

Did you try a 256MB AGP aperture?

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the ULTIMATE PC processor

Guest · Jan 18, 2002

Not yet. 128MB aperture brought it down. I don't know how the aperture could really benefit my if I set it to half me memory. That just means my video card can try to use 256MB of slow memory.

Have you seen increased scores by setting it to 256?

AMD: Join the rebellion!

AMD_Man · Apr 19, 2002

Bump, Fugger brought this up in the CPU forum.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the ULTIMATE PC processor

williamc · Apr 20, 2002

You obviously have no life, nVidiot...

"WtF? Package just said silver stuff, why won't the HSF come off?" - Failed A+ 6 times

NialM · Apr 20, 2002

Here are my marks.....

<A HREF="http://www.nialm.com/bench.htm" target="_new"> My Bench Marks </A>

The sum of the intelligence on the planet is a constant; the population is growing.

bront · Apr 20, 2002

'cause it's the thread that never ends... it just goes on and on my friends....

<Repeat>

The Windows Gods demand money to appease the BSOD! - Rev. Bill Gates

Matisaro · Apr 20, 2002

A FUGGER, average gain for the det 4 drivers was 25%, not 3%.

B. My system is 100% stable with no artifacts, and unlike you I am not afraid to post a compare link.

http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1428814

C: online scores on madonion are nearly IMPOSSIBLE to cheat, hence us DEMANDING you post your scores there and not some shitty looking jpeg you posted with just a number(which could have been edited for all we know AND could have been at 640x480)

this is not about whos computer is faster, I will be the first to admit that there are ALOT of faster scores on 3dmark2001 than mine, and alot of them are on p4's (but like someone said in another thread fugger, the about 75% of the top 10% of scores are athlons, but the top top score is a mad ass oced p4) the point of this WHOLE thread was that FUGGER LIED, and not just that he lied, when someone else posted their scores, their real scores, ones they post and are honest about, HE BELITTLED THEM AND SAID THEIR SYSTEMS SUCK, BASED ON HIS BOLD FACED LIE.

So fugger can go to hell for all I care, he demanded an apology from me, and he will NEVER get one. He is a troll, a liar, and a benchmark faker, and he is completely useless to anyone.

That sums up my position on the discussion.

The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark

shmeggegie · Apr 20, 2002

shelley winters is dead, isn't she?

'cause it's the thread that never ends... it just goes on and on my friends....

does this count as a bump? 'cause, you know, it was bumped very recently.

10GHZ · Apr 20, 2002

wu wu wu ...i'm here i'm here, did i miss anything?
argh.. .nuts

muc0n · Apr 20, 2002

I have an 800mhz Athlon processor with 320MB of pc133 RAM. I have a Voodoo 5 5500 AGP card and get a score of 1602 in 3d Mark 2001SE with nothing overclocked. I was wondering if anyone has a system similiar to mine with a different video card and what scores they got?

eden · Apr 21, 2002

And I thought KennyShin had a big view post count, this one has 17000, HOLY MOLY!!!

--
Thunderbirds in wintertime, Northwoods in summertime! :lol:

Matisaro · Apr 21, 2002

Fugger is calling into question my getting an email from his provided "same setup as me" link.

Here is the text of that post/email so it is easy to find.

Heh, I emailed fuggers great evidence and sent him the html of this entire thread (he couldnt access this website for some reason)

and here is his reply.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree- the guy is full of [-peep-]. I personally know for a fact it takes 2
Ghz P4 to break 7500.
----- Original Message -----
From: <LordMatisaro@aol.com>
To: <jeffreybales@home.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: hey

> here, i saved the html code to a doccument, just open this with ie (or
> netscape) and it will show you the webpage. (it worked for me, hopefully
ti
> will work for you 🙂
>
>
> as you can see this guy FUGGER is a dipshit
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LOL, even your p4 friends think you are full of it fugger, furthermore, your claim that you got 7300 on a 215/515 gf3 are BULLSHEOT as well, our friend here ho actually has a p4 he can get that high agrees, so post some results to prove yourself, lol.

The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark

FUGGER · Apr 21, 2002

----- Original Message -----
From: <p4fugger@hotmail.com>
To: <president_bush@whitehose.gov>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:09 AM
Subject: Re: hey

I agree, that punk Matisaro on THG forum is a goat blower. I respond to your emails in the email that you send me, no its not a fake I can do that. I am the president!

>hey, got that new machine for you it rocks, score like hig >and stuff in 3Dmark.
>We gonna hook up and hit K street? Oh yeah I almost forgot that when I reply and it quotes my reply with > to start each line, sometimes I forget where to put them when >I fake an emial. got any tips?

ROFL, supprised no one pointed that out before!! Kudos to me.

You are limited to what your mind can perceive.

AMD_Man · Apr 21, 2002

lol, this is getting pathetic... 😱

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the ULTIMATE PC processor

shmeggegie · Apr 21, 2002

that was the funniest thing I've read in a long time. you know why this thread is so long with so many views? becuase YOU PEOPLE KEEP BUMPING IT AFTER EIGHT (8) MONTHS! dear god.

BUMP!

Studies have shown that most people prefer the taste of AMD to the taste of Intel

shmeggegie · Apr 21, 2002

fugger, I'm afraid there's nothing wrong with the format of his email. regard:

Heh, I emailed fuggers great evidence and sent him the html of this entire thread (he couldnt access this website for some reason)

and here is his reply.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree- the guy is full of [-peep-]. I personally know for a fact it takes 2
Ghz P4 to break 7500.
----- Original Message -----
From: <LordMatisaro@aol.com>
To: <jeffreybales@home.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: hey

> here, i saved the html code to a doccument, just open this with ie (or
> netscape) and it will show you the webpage. (it worked for me, hopefully
ti
> will work for you 🙂
>
>
> as you can see this guy FUGGER is a dipshit
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LOL, even your p4 friends think you are full of it fugger, furthermore, your claim that you got 7300 on a 215/515 gf3 are BULLSHEOT as well, our friend here ho actually has a p4 he can get that high agrees, so post some results to prove yourself, lol.

The first thing I'll point out is that when a person replies to an email, they have the option to type ABOVE the "Original Message" section which includes the sender and adressee information of the ORIGINAL MESSAGE. (In this case, the original message was from Matisaro, and jeff bales' response was written above the ORIGINAL message.) Further, the missing > is really just a formatting error that occurred because his email client was sized differently than jeff bales' was. For all we know, his client window was just shrunken a little far. Don't forget that carrots are inserted by the SENDER'S client, not the recievers, so so long as Matisaro's client was sized a little differently than jeff bales', the character placement might be different.

Studies have shown that most people prefer the taste of AMD to the taste of Intel

Matisaro · Apr 21, 2002

Not a faked email, live with it liar.

fugger=teh pathetic.

^=Matisaros last post in this godforsaken thread.

The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark

FUGGER · Apr 22, 2002

"Not a faked email, live with it liar."

Your are a damn liar, look at that hacked up email that you patched together. LIAR!

Where is the link where is the rest of the email?? FAKE!
doctored to suit your needs.

Good etiquette, keep calling me a liar. loser

I win, I take home the prize. You are yet to beat my score punk!Edited by FUGGER on 05/12/02 04:20 AM.

My 3DMark2001 score

Splendid

Guest

Guest

Guest

Guest

Splendid

Guest

Guest

Guest

Guest

Guest

Guest

Splendid

Guest

Guest

Splendid

Distinguished

Distinguished

Distinguished

Splendid

Distinguished

Distinguished

Distinguished

Champion

Splendid

Distinguished

Splendid

Distinguished

Distinguished

Splendid

Distinguished

Share this page