Avram, this has been an interesting exercise, with many good and useful comments following in the forum here. Thanks. Like many, I've become very unhappy with where Windows is heading....from an OS to a selling platform. So....
I've used Linux (Ubuntu) for at least a half-dozen years or so, as well as Windows forever (going back to Windows when it was nothing more than a framework for the first Excel, not a standalone product). Primary reason....performance. I am referring specifically to python (now 3.12.3) and Wolfram Mathematica, both of which I use extensively. I have found that both tools perform significantly better under Linux than under Windows (on the same physical machine, with a variant of dual-boot). Python programs will typically take 15-25% longer to run on Windows. And Mathematica benchmarks are about 15% worse on Windows. For example, here is a very simple python stats program:
start=time.time()
bdist=np.random.binomial(5, .25, size=2_000_000_000)
bins=np.bincount(bdist)
elapsed=time.time()-start
Typical run time of 29 seconds on Linux, 35 seconds on Windows. And for Windows, this is a best case, with python running in a PowerShell prompt. Worst case scenario is running the same program in a legacy Command Prompt shell with (new) power setting set to "Balanced", which then takes over 50 seconds. Setting the power to "Best Performance" will improve the Command Prompt shell to closer to the 35 second time. The governing factor here with Windows is how it assigns processors, in my case the 14700K. In the case of the PowerShell, it always assigns p-cores. For Command Prompt in Best Performance mode, p-cores. For Command prompt while in Balanced mode, e-cores, while the p-cores remain idle (go figure). Just some of the nuances of Windows task scheduling (pardon the Windows digression). But Linux consistently still trounces Windows' best performance, in my experience anyway.
In spite of the benefits, Linux certainly has had its challenges, even for someone who has been dealing with this technology for years. What should be the simplest tasks (such as installing a printer), can be difficult and frustrating, particularly if you don't want the low function default CUPS drivers, and need/want the more enhanced drivers from the manufacturers (which when you install, often tell you they are as-is and not really supported). And while Windows still has its chaotic distribution of settings between Control Panel and the new Settings scheme, Linux has been worse from release to release. Whether it's the switch from X11 to Wayland, display scaling, changes to default programs, apt to snap, other changes and churn, even a seemingly simple move to barely readable fonts in Ubuntu 24.04 (not to worry, a fix: apt install fonts-ubuntu-classic), it has not been simple. Thank goodness for all of the forums out there, although much of the advice is already out of date because of the continuing flux. I am constantly chasing things down. Granted, my experience is based on one distribution platform, but Linux is still not for the average user.
Avram, although you've had to be selective in what you try, I hope you can spend a little more time on the basics everybody has to deal with (such as printer drivers). Perhaps system backup as well. Since I am running a dual-boot type of environment, I am fortunate to be able to use Macrium to back up the EXT Linux system as well, and restore if I want to go back to an earlier config. The Linux tools to me are barely usable. I think you need more than a week! But thanks again.
PS.. You don't need Rufus to create the install USB. Just open the ISO file and copy the files to an empty formatted USB.