[citation][nom]alidan[/nom]i dont like this. i dont want amd to be a predator. because that means that they will venture into waters not tested and fail, allot, before they succeed.and who will they unload the cost onto? what i want them to do is innovate and remain a viable option. i want them to be an open option, i don't want them to close systems off for amd only (think what nvidia does constantly)please tell me that im not the only one here who sees potential for the amd i support to die.[/citation]
Are you kidding me? This is fantastic news. For AMD to provide this innovation you long for so much, it takes an R&D department with money and other resources to pump into it. To be able to acquire those resources requires gaining market share, taking profits that once belonged to your competitor for yourself. To get this market share from someone that's so far ahead of them at the moment, they'll need to get a little rough, cut-throat even.
Don't get me wrong though, it could always backfire on AMD as well. But so can just about any business strategy. I know there's plenty about successful business models/strategies that I don't even know enough about to not even have a clue. But f*** that, I'm excited to see if AMD will take the Predator approach. I want them too.
Game on b*tches