mindless728
Splendid
sakatainx :
According to
http://www.insidehw.com/Editorials/Events/Sneak-Peak-To-NVidias-Upcoming-GPU-GF100-Fermi.html
NVIDIA guys told us that due architectural difference between GF100 and HD5870, when comparing just Tessellation performance, difference is about 2 to 6 times in favor of GF100. Only performance related figures shown in this part of presentation in application not developed for NVDIA was from Microsoft SDK for rendering cubemap faces. As GF100 can render six cubemap faces in one pass, it is 4 and 4.7 times faster when rendering ball and car objects from SDK.
2 to 6 times faster or 0.2 to 0.6 times faster
http://www.insidehw.com/Editorials/Events/Sneak-Peak-To-NVidias-Upcoming-GPU-GF100-Fermi.html
NVIDIA guys told us that due architectural difference between GF100 and HD5870, when comparing just Tessellation performance, difference is about 2 to 6 times in favor of GF100. Only performance related figures shown in this part of presentation in application not developed for NVDIA was from Microsoft SDK for rendering cubemap faces. As GF100 can render six cubemap faces in one pass, it is 4 and 4.7 times faster when rendering ball and car objects from SDK.
2 to 6 times faster or 0.2 to 0.6 times faster
cool, so NV told you something good about their own product, imagine that
how about instead a 3rd party, that would be better