EzioAs
Distinguished
I agree with blazorthon on a couple of his points (sorry I don't read them all). The 660 has a good starting price, just like the old 460 but AMD was fully prepared this time and both (GTX660 and HD 7870/7850. Wait, that's three isn't it?)are actually good buy depending on the titles you play. However, as blazorthon pointed out, AMD current 7800 (and the 7900) are great for overclocking. So, for a buyer who's into overclocking, the choice is obvious but like I said before in my early post, the 660 isn't a bad card at all.
On the topic of AA (anti-aliasing), I think that AA is subjective and imo, depends on two things : Games played and eye sensitivity. Most 1st person games looks pretty good already with 4xMSAA and higher AA makes little (but noticeable) difference. On the other hand, 3rd person games with open world such as assassin's creed or GTA4, 8xMSAA is worlds better than 4xAA. It's like no jaggies vs. jaggies. AA also depends on the person playing. Take the average (console, non-experienced) gamer for example, and let him play BF3 at 1080p on a 24" screen. He probably won't even see the aliasing on objects. However if you take the experienced PC gamer (you, me and hopefully everyone else in this forum), they can probably tell straight away whether it's no AA, 2xAA, 4xAA or for the people who are more sensitive, 8xAA.
The conclusion is, for every games you play, set the AA as high as you can which gives you framerates which you are most comfortable. Some people don't care about AA and prefer their fps always at 60+. Others might be comfy enough at 40fps with drops to 30fps here and there as long as they get the best possible image quality with their hardware. It's your choice in the end.
On the topic of AA (anti-aliasing), I think that AA is subjective and imo, depends on two things : Games played and eye sensitivity. Most 1st person games looks pretty good already with 4xMSAA and higher AA makes little (but noticeable) difference. On the other hand, 3rd person games with open world such as assassin's creed or GTA4, 8xMSAA is worlds better than 4xAA. It's like no jaggies vs. jaggies. AA also depends on the person playing. Take the average (console, non-experienced) gamer for example, and let him play BF3 at 1080p on a 24" screen. He probably won't even see the aliasing on objects. However if you take the experienced PC gamer (you, me and hopefully everyone else in this forum), they can probably tell straight away whether it's no AA, 2xAA, 4xAA or for the people who are more sensitive, 8xAA.
The conclusion is, for every games you play, set the AA as high as you can which gives you framerates which you are most comfortable. Some people don't care about AA and prefer their fps always at 60+. Others might be comfy enough at 40fps with drops to 30fps here and there as long as they get the best possible image quality with their hardware. It's your choice in the end.