On KMW starter crypts

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

I've been quite curious myself, and I haven't seen many speculation on
that topic since the preview began.

What do you expect to see on the starters in terms of vampires?

Since WW re-released the game, almost all starters' crypt cards were
comprised mostly of reprinted vampires. The exceptions were
starter-only vamps and a few new ones on the Cam set. Let's see the
formula through the ages:

- Sabbat War: 10 reprinted vampires from Sabbat (though one has to
account to the fact that the whole expansion was a reprint) and 2
starter-only new ones.

- Final Nights: 2 starter-only vamps and 10 reprinted vampires from
Ancient Hearts and Dark Sovereigns (as appropriate)

- Bloodlines: no starters.

- Camarilla: 1 reprinted vamp from Final Nights; 8 reprinted vamps
from DS/AH; 3 new vamps that appear on boosters -> beginning of group
3

- Anarchs: 9 reprinted vampires from the Camarilla set; 2 starter-only
vampires; 1 new vampire that also appear on boosters (exception for
the Barons: 8 reprinted, 2 starter-only, 2 new - one being and ADV
version of a Cam Set vampire)

- Black Hand: Pretty much the same: 9 reprinted vampires from the
older sets; 2 starter-only vamps; 1 new vamp that also appear on
boosters (disregarding the swapping problem which placed Yong-Sun ADV
on the starter etc.)

- Gehenna: no starters.

And Kindred Most Wanted, the first expansion to account for group 4 on
starters?
I don't think these would bring group 2-3 crypts. Not that it is
impossible to work out, but I guess it would be frustrating to a new
player spending money on a few boxes to get a bunch of mixed vampires
from groups 2 to 4.
On the other hand, how would the crypts be assembled using only group
3-4? And the long tradition of reprinting vamps? Spreading a lot of
new vampires on these crypts would also mean that the hypothetical
buyer who orders one starter box and, say, two booster boxes ends up
with 5 to 7 copies of these vampires. Not good also.

So what's the formula? Or there is no one, throw them as necessary?
(which the Anathema starter could easily suggest).

One wild guess:

All starters will feature 3 new vamps that also appear on boosters and
2 starter-only ones. The other 7 are reprints. The formula suited the
Cam edition - the start of group 3.

So the Anathema deck would include:
- Base Kemintiri and/or Base Tariq + 5 or 6 reprints (Count Germaine,
Ferox e Dylan are candidates); Jayne Jonestown and Rabbat as the
starter-only already announced; Adv Kemintiri and/or Tariq plus 1 or
2 new vampires (certainly Red List ones).

The Baali deck:
- 7 vamps previously released from group 3 with any combination of
obf/pre (including some or all 4 Setites released: Amenophobis,
Kahina, Ezekiel and Seren Sukardi); Sahira Siraj and Maureen as the
starter-only already announced; base or adv Petaniqua and 2 new Baali,
or even 3 new Baali, as the new vamps (that depends very much on how
Petaniqua will be treated. We never had the base and adv version of a
new vampire first released in the same set before, I believe).

The Alastors deck:
- 7 reprinted random vamps, depending on what set of disciplines will
be used (though the starter-only suggest at least [pot]); Benedict and
Echo as the starter-only already announced; Tatiana and 2 other new
vampires. (Maybe these 2 are Assamites if the deck include [obf],
[cel] and guns somehow. Not unrealistic since Assamites are used to be
hired by the Camarilla...)

Finally, the !Gangrel deck:
- Easy: Maria Stone, Harry Reese, Spider, Jalan-Aajav and Hartmut
Stover provide some synergy between country and city !gangrels. Splash
two weenies - Scarlet O' Toole and Jesus Alcala, maybe? - and you got
the 7 reprinted ones. Denette Stensen and Jeffrey Mullins are already
announced as starter-only... and the 3 new ones could be anything.
Maybe this deck in particular comes with less new vampires, since 3
new !Gangrel plus 2 starter-only would left only two new !Gangrel out
of 7 to be found only on boosters.

But this is just a ill-thought rant. Anyone would like to add up?

best,

Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
V:EKN National Coordinator for Brazil
--------------------------------------
Now a "luminary", whatever it means:
http://www.thelasombra.com/WhosWho/fabiomacedo.htm
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Fabio "Sooner" Macedo wrote:

> What do you expect to see on the starters in terms of vampires?

I wanted a pure baali deck, but i already know i won´t get that.... 🙁


> So what's the formula? Or there is no one, throw them as necessary?
> (which the Anathema starter could easily suggest).

i think this will pretty much cover both anathema and alastor starters.
probably a 3-4 crypt, since the mixing of clans in the starters would
allow less impat on the boosters percentage of G3/G4 vampires.

> So the Anathema deck would include:
> - Base Kemintiri and/or Base Tariq + 5 or 6 reprints (Count Germaine,
> Ferox e Dylan are candidates); Jayne Jonestown and Rabbat as the
> starter-only already announced; Adv Kemintiri and/or Tariq plus 1 or
> 2 new vampires (certainly Red List ones).

that would work, i guess.

> The Baali deck:
> - 7 vamps previously released from group 3 with any combination of
> obf/pre (including some or all 4 Setites released: Amenophobis,
> Kahina, Ezekiel and Seren Sukardi); Sahira Siraj and Maureen as the
> starter-only already announced; base or adv Petaniqua and 2 new
Baali,
> or even 3 new Baali, as the new vamps (that depends very much on how
> Petaniqua will be treated. We never had the base and adv version of a
> new vampire first released in the same set before, I believe).

now, that i don´t like... see, a Baali deck with what? 5 baali out of
12 vampires? i know it´s a bloodline and all that, but hey, they´re
the main star of the deck!!! give me group 2 reprints in the new layout
anytime. no to mention reprinting amenophobis, seren and kahina would
be reprinting vampires that i can still easily get through boosters
other than the KMW ones. way easier to get gehenna than bloodlines. I
sure hope we get both versions of petaniqua, though.

> The Alastors deck:
> - 7 reprinted random vamps, depending on what set of disciplines will
> be used (though the starter-only suggest at least [pot]); Benedict
and
> Echo as the starter-only already announced; Tatiana and 2 other new
> vampires. (Maybe these 2 are Assamites if the deck include [obf],
> [cel] and guns somehow. Not unrealistic since Assamites are used to
be
> hired by the Camarilla...)

might work.

> Finally, the !Gangrel deck:
> - Easy: Maria Stone, Harry Reese, Spider, Jalan-Aajav and Hartmut
> Stover provide some synergy between country and city !gangrels.
Splash
> two weenies - Scarlet O' Toole and Jesus Alcala, maybe? - and you got
> the 7 reprinted ones. Denette Stensen and Jeffrey Mullins are already
> announced as starter-only... and the 3 new ones could be anything.
> Maybe this deck in particular comes with less new vampires, since 3
> new !Gangrel plus 2 starter-only would left only two new !Gangrel out
> of 7 to be found only on boosters.

might work as well. i don´t know about the whole "less new vamps",
though. they´ll probably try a greater sinergy between country and
city gangrel, and so probably other vampires beyond those you mentioned
will attempt that sinergy. i also hope to see some interesting
multi-discipline cards in this particular starter.

cheers
Luciano "Baital" de Sampaio
VEKN Anarch Baron de Curitiba
VEKN Baali Clan Newsletter Editor
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Fabio "Sooner" Macedo wrote:
> So the Anathema deck would include:
> - Base Kemintiri and/or Base Tariq + 5 or 6 reprints (Count Germaine,
> Ferox e Dylan are candidates); Jayne Jonestown and Rabbat as the
> starter-only already announced; Adv Kemintiri and/or Tariq plus 1 or
> 2 new vampires (certainly Red List ones).

Kemintiri/Tariq/Ferox/Dylan are Group 2. Germaine is Group 4.

I would expect a 3/4 crypt with Count Germaine (Base) in there, plus
maybe Hector Trelane (Base) if the set includes an advanced, Red List
version.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Fabio "Sooner" wrote:

>> Kemintiri/Tariq/Ferox/Dylan are Group 2. Germaine is Group 4.
>>
>> I would expect a 3/4 crypt with Count Germaine (Base) in there, plus
>> maybe Hector Trelane (Base) if the set includes an advanced, Red List
>> version.
>
> *slap on the forehead*
>
> Of course, my fault. That leaves us with the Red list minions
> announced/supposed to belong to group 3 or 4: Count Germaine and
> Rabbat (on the old book list), Valerius Maior (previewed), and
> whatever other Red Listers the expansion offer. My bad.

AFAIK, it's not a given that the starter decks will be legal for
constructed play, so you could have some illegal-for-constructed-play
grouping. I kind of hope not, but it's a possibility.

Matt Morgan
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

"Matthew T. Morgan" <farquar@io.com> wrote in message
news:20050210160632.A13356@fnord.io.com...
> AFAIK, it's not a given that the starter decks will be legal for constructed play, so you could have some
> illegal-for-constructed-play grouping. I kind of hope not, but it's a possibility.

I'm not sure if it's been said in so many words that they must be,
either. But I think it's probably a good idea. For one thing, it
might cause a bit of confusion about the rule if "preconstructed"
decks aren't legal for constructed play. Don't forget, that little
rulebook that comes _with_ the starter deck states the grouping rule
as an unconditional rule of the game. It's only specifically
rescinded for limited tournaments in the VEKN tournament rules.


Fred
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

<emmitsvenson@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Fabio "Sooner" Macedo wrote:
>> So the Anathema deck would include:
>> - Base Kemintiri and/or Base Tariq + 5 or 6 reprints (Count Germaine,
>> Ferox e Dylan are candidates); Jayne Jonestown and Rabbat as the
>> starter-only already announced; Adv Kemintiri and/or Tariq plus 1 or
>> 2 new vampires (certainly Red List ones).
>
>Kemintiri/Tariq/Ferox/Dylan are Group 2. Germaine is Group 4.
>
>I would expect a 3/4 crypt with Count Germaine (Base) in there, plus
>maybe Hector Trelane (Base) if the set includes an advanced, Red List
>version.

*slap on the forehead*

Of course, my fault. That leaves us with the Red list minions
announced/supposed to belong to group 3 or 4: Count Germaine and
Rabbat (on the old book list), Valerius Maior (previewed), and
whatever other Red Listers the expansion offer. My bad.

best,

Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
V:TES National Coordinator for Brazil
-----------------------------------------------------
now a "luminary", whatever it means:
http://www.thelasombra.com/WhosWho/fabiomacedo.htm
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

On 10 Feb 2005 12:02:48 -0800, "press" <subvertion@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Fabio "Sooner" Macedo wrote:
>> The Baali deck:
>> - 7 vamps previously released from group 3 with any combination of
>> obf/pre (including some or all 4 Setites released: Amenophobis,
>> Kahina, Ezekiel and Seren Sukardi); Sahira Siraj and Maureen as the
>> starter-only already announced; base or adv Petaniqua and 2 new
>Baali,
>> or even 3 new Baali, as the new vamps (that depends very much on how
>> Petaniqua will be treated. We never had the base and adv version of a
>> new vampire first released in the same set before, I believe).
>
>now, that i don´t like... see, a Baali deck with what? 5 baali out of
>12 vampires? i know it´s a bloodline and all that, but hey, they´re
>the main star of the deck!!! give me group 2 reprints in the new layout
>anytime. no to mention reprinting amenophobis, seren and kahina would
>be reprinting vampires that i can still easily get through boosters
>other than the KMW ones.

There's another thing to consider here (about the Setites issue).
All four group 3/4 indie vampires already released were splashed
between THREE expansions. That means: a random player who wants to try
group 3/4 indie crypts must not only buy KMW but at least a bunch/box
of boosters from Anarchs (1 for each clan), Black Hand (same) and
Gehenna (2 each).

Not that it does not suit any given company who has to sell to
continue producing. But giving an (late) option by reprinting most (if
not all) 4 vampires for each indie clan already released in this
grouping pair would not hurt, and could bring back to the fore indie
players who refused to buy these earlier expansions just to get a
token vampires from a new group. If an indie-oriented expansion is not
the best chance to do this, when it will be?

Trading aside, of course (myself, I already own enough copies of each
besides the group 4 Setites. Didn't buy Gehenna boxes yet.)


>sure hope we get both versions of petaniqua, though.

I'm puzzled about this. The Barons starter had both versions of Jeremy
McNeil, but the base was a reprint. The same with Jessica and the
!Toreador starter (as far as I remember... I'm no Sabbat expert). N
precedent on this issue: both base and advanced versions coming out
for the first time in the same set. Anything can happen.


>might work as well. i don´t know about the whole "less new vamps",
>though. they´ll probably try a greater sinergy between country and
>city gangrel, and so probably other vampires beyond those you mentioned
>will attempt that sinergy. i also hope to see some interesting
>multi-discipline cards in this particular starter.

I've made a search for group 3/4 !Gangrel and found that these 5
(Spider, Hartmut, Jalan Aajav, Maria Stone and Harry Reese) are the
ones who have at least 4 of the 5 disciplines available as "in-clan"
(ani, for, pro, cel, obf). Mitru is the only known vamp to have all 5.
Don't believe they'll throw in any vampire who is not !Gangrel if they
have an available crypt to build a monoclan one.
Of course, that does not mean that the crypt will be made towards any
synergy. It could all be made out of country or city !Gangrels. Who
knows? That would leave "synergistic" vampires like Mitru to be hunted
for in boosters.
About the "less new vamps" issue, it's simple. The !Gangrel received 7
vampires in this expansion, the same count as all 4 indie clans. So
this is an expansion set towards them as much as the indie clans and
the whole Red List theme. Why release 5 out of 7 in a starter? That
could happen with the Baali (say, 4 or all 5 in their starter) because
they're a bloodline anyway and can't gain that much vampires all at
once, so there's not much to do about.
Don't forget the doubling issue also. Each new vamp that appears on a
starter means 2 copies per starter box and another 2 (approximately)
in a booster box. Since most hardcore players and collectors buy at
least two booster boxes, that would mean 6 or 7 copies of the same
vampire. I imagine not many players/collectors would be happy with
that if they could get a reprinted vamp they have only 2 or 3 copies
available. Not to mention the new players getting to the game through
that expansion.


>cheers
>Luciano "Baital" de Sampaio
>VEKN Anarch Baron de Curitiba
>VEKN Baali Clan Newsletter Editor

best,

Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
V:TES National Coordinator for Brazil
-----------------------------------------------------
now a "luminary", whatever it means:
http://www.thelasombra.com/WhosWho/fabiomacedo.htm
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:08:09 -0600, "Matthew T. Morgan"
<farquar@io.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Fabio "Sooner" wrote:
>
>>> Kemintiri/Tariq/Ferox/Dylan are Group 2. Germaine is Group 4.
>>>
>>> I would expect a 3/4 crypt with Count Germaine (Base) in there, plus
>>> maybe Hector Trelane (Base) if the set includes an advanced, Red List
>>> version.
>>
>> *slap on the forehead*
>>
>> Of course, my fault. That leaves us with the Red list minions
>> announced/supposed to belong to group 3 or 4: Count Germaine and
>> Rabbat (on the old book list), Valerius Maior (previewed), and
>> whatever other Red Listers the expansion offer. My bad.
>
>AFAIK, it's not a given that the starter decks will be legal for
>constructed play, so you could have some illegal-for-constructed-play
>grouping. I kind of hope not, but it's a possibility.
>Matt Morgan

That's why I'm puzzled about what we could receive.
Anyway, at least we have no precedent on starters with illegal crypts
for sanctioned play, so I discarded this from teh beginning for the
sake of pure logic.
Not that I believe these decisions are handled by logic alone, since
almost everything could be reasoned out. Better to have illegal crypts
than what we had in the Malk starter 😉

best,

Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
V:TES National Coordinator for Brazil
-----------------------------------------------------
now a "luminary", whatever it means:
http://www.thelasombra.com/WhosWho/fabiomacedo.htm
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

In message <rnmn0153hjjmoacghcqgokcuip66ane77g@4ax.com>, "Fabio
\"Sooner\"" <fabio_sooner@NOSPAMterra.com.br> writes:
>There's another thing to consider here (about the Setites issue).
>All four group 3/4 indie vampires already released were splashed
>between THREE expansions. That means: a random player who wants to try
>group 3/4 indie crypts must not only buy KMW but at least a bunch/box
>of boosters from Anarchs (1 for each clan), Black Hand (same) and
>Gehenna (2 each).

Well aside from the fact that they can borrow cards, trade or buy
singles, [1/2] Camarilla vampires were split over a variety of
expansions too. V:TES/Jyhad, Ancient Hearts, Dark Sovereigns and Final
Nights. Of course, there were reprints in the starters afterwards, but
this didn't seem to stop anyone playing the wide variety of decks
possible before.

Additionally, if it's a random *newbie*, they can always buy/borrow a
Final Nights starter or similar - the differences between [2/3] and
[3/4] are likely to be less of an issue when getting a player
interested. Slightly more experienced players will generally be in a
position to know how/where they can get specific cards, though.

--
James Coupe "Why do so many talented people turn out to be sexual
PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D deviants? Why can't they just be normal like me and
EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 look at internet pictures of men's cocks all day?"
13D7E668C3695D623D5D -- www.livejournal.com/users/scarletdemon/
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:41:01 +0000, James Coupe <james@zephyr.org.uk>
wrote:

>In message <rnmn0153hjjmoacghcqgokcuip66ane77g@4ax.com>, "Fabio
>\"Sooner\"" <fabio_sooner@NOSPAMterra.com.br> writes:
>>There's another thing to consider here (about the Setites issue).
>>All four group 3/4 indie vampires already released were splashed
>>between THREE expansions. That means: a random player who wants to try
>>group 3/4 indie crypts must not only buy KMW but at least a bunch/box
>>of boosters from Anarchs (1 for each clan), Black Hand (same) and
>>Gehenna (2 each).
>
>Well aside from the fact that they can borrow cards, trade or buy
>singles, [1/2] Camarilla vampires were split over a variety of
>expansions too. V:TES/Jyhad, Ancient Hearts, Dark Sovereigns and Final
>Nights. Of course, there were reprints in the starters afterwards, but
>this didn't seem to stop anyone playing the wide variety of decks
>possible before.

True, but I guess there's a somewhat sensible difference in that a
random player buying any of these expansions will end up having enough
vampires from each set's clans to build a crypt. Even DS/AH accounted
for that - 10 vampires for each of the indie clans. In Final Nights
that random player would get most of these reprinted in the boosters
and 9 to 12 brand new ones - offering more than 20 vampires to choose
from in a single set!

KMW is giving out only 7 vampires for each indie clan, and 1 out of
these 7 (the ADV versions) won't be usable with the other 6. This does
not strike me as a reasonable number to build a crypt unless you
actively want to disincourage monoclan strategies.

Of course, all this consider the possibility that giving a certain
number of vampires to build a monoclan crypt is an issue.



>Additionally, if it's a random *newbie*, they can always buy/borrow a
>Final Nights starter or similar - the differences between [2/3] and
>[3/4] are likely to be less of an issue when getting a player
>interested. Slightly more experienced players will generally be in a
>position to know how/where they can get specific cards, though.

If the random newbie buying KMW is set to buy Final Nights to play the
indie clans, I guess we have some sort of a problem. As stated in
recent posts, the grouping rule is explicit in the rulebook. So
marketing new players to adhere to the grouping rule is nothing but
logical. I'd prefer to see the random newbie getting enough to build
his 3-4 crypt the way it suits him - monoclan or not. Having only 6
vampires for each clan available almost force that random newbie to
mix clans to achieve better results.

Again, being an "anarchist supporter", getting new players enticed to
the glory of the mixed crypts is fine. I just believe it's better to
give the option than to leave no option.

best,


Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
V:EKN National Coordinator for Brazil
--------------------------------------
Now a "luminary", whatever it means:
http://www.thelasombra.com/WhosWho/fabiomacedo.htm
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> If the random newbie buying KMW is set to buy Final Nights to play the
> indie clans, I guess we have some sort of a problem. As stated in
> recent posts, the grouping rule is explicit in the rulebook. So
> marketing new players to adhere to the grouping rule is nothing but
> logical. I'd prefer to see the random newbie getting enough to build
> his 3-4 crypt the way it suits him - monoclan or not. Having only 6
> vampires for each clan available almost force that random newbie to
> mix clans to achieve better results.
>

Would you also like to see he gets enough power rares so he could built
his 3-4 deck the way it suits him? I know I didn't get any War Ghouls when
I was a newbie, and that almost forces me to mix strategies to achieve
better results. To a certain extent, a newbie HAS to put up with a
suboptimal deck. That's how you learn to be a better player.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Matthew T. Morgan wrote:
> AFAIK, it's not a given that the starter decks will be legal for
> constructed play, so you could have some illegal-for-constructed-play
> grouping. I kind of hope not, but it's a possibility.

The grouping rule has nothing to do VEKN constructed play. It's a rule
in the main VTES rulebook. As this rulebook is presumably included in
the starter decks I think it's a good bet that the starter decks will
obey the printed grouping rule.

(Of course, this doesn't preclude the grouping rule changing).

--
* lehrbuch (lehrbuch@gmail.com)
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:03:38 -0500, Gregory Stuart Pettigrew
<etherial@sidehack.sat.gweep.net> wrote:

>> If the random newbie buying KMW is set to buy Final Nights to play the
>> indie clans, I guess we have some sort of a problem. As stated in
>> recent posts, the grouping rule is explicit in the rulebook. So
>> marketing new players to adhere to the grouping rule is nothing but
>> logical. I'd prefer to see the random newbie getting enough to build
>> his 3-4 crypt the way it suits him - monoclan or not. Having only 6
>> vampires for each clan available almost force that random newbie to
>> mix clans to achieve better results.
>
>Would you also like to see he gets enough power rares so he could built
>his 3-4 deck the way it suits him? I know I didn't get any War Ghouls when
>I was a newbie, and that almost forces me to mix strategies to achieve
>better results. To a certain extent, a newbie HAS to put up with a
>suboptimal deck. That's how you learn to be a better player.

Couldn't agree more, and the paragraph subsequent to the one you
quoted addressed that issue.
But frankly, I don't think having less than 12 vampires available to
do a monoclan crypt applies as a good strategy to force a new player
to learn and put up with a suboptimal deck. That's pretty much in the
field of library cards. Choosing a *type* of crypt - monoclan,
discipline-based, mixed or whatever - should be a choice. And indeed
it is, provided you buy the last three expansions (if you want to play
indies)... or the appropriate expansion if you want to play Sabbat
(Black Hand or Sabbat War), Anarchs (duh) or Camarilla (duh again).

That's what concerns me. All these expansions gave the average player
the chance to build a deck (suboptimal or not) with plenty of choice
regarding vampires if you buy a starter and a booster box. If the
group 3-4 indies don't get reprinted in KMW starters, one is pretty
much stuck on mixing clans. Again, nothing that a few trading and
buying won't fix, but it's at least a break in the pattern (and being
an indie clans fan, I regret that. Yes, I'm biased ;-), but trying to
be reasonable.

best,

Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
V:EKN National Coordinator for Brazil
--------------------------------------
Now a "luminary", whatever it means:
http://www.thelasombra.com/WhosWho/fabiomacedo.htm
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:30:25 -0200, "Fabio \"Sooner\" Macedo"
<fabio@cohesp.com.br> scrawled:


>The Baali deck:
>- 7 vamps previously released from group 3 with any combination of
>obf/pre (including some or all 4 Setites released: Amenophobis,
>Kahina, Ezekiel and Seren Sukardi); Sahira Siraj and Maureen as the
>starter-only already announced; base or adv Petaniqua and 2 new Baali,
>or even 3 new Baali, as the new vamps (that depends very much on how
>Petaniqua will be treated. We never had the base and adv version of a
>new vampire first released in the same set before, I believe).

Midget as a reprint, maybe?

salem
http://www.users.tpg.com.au/adsltqna/VtES/index.htm
(replace "hotmail" with "yahoo" to email)
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:28:14 +1100, salem
<salem_christ.geo@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:30:25 -0200, "Fabio \"Sooner\" Macedo"
><fabio@cohesp.com.br> scrawled:
>
>>The Baali deck:
>>- 7 vamps previously released from group 3 with any combination of
>>obf/pre (including some or all 4 Setites released: Amenophobis,
>>Kahina, Ezekiel and Seren Sukardi); Sahira Siraj and Maureen as the
>>starter-only already announced; base or adv Petaniqua and 2 new Baali,
>>or even 3 new Baali, as the new vamps (that depends very much on how
>>Petaniqua will be treated. We never had the base and adv version of a
>>new vampire first released in the same set before, I believe).
>
>Midget as a reprint, maybe?
>salem
>http://www.users.tpg.com.au/adsltqna/VtES/index.htm
>(replace "hotmail" with "yahoo" to email)

Good shot, certainly.

Any more? Keep aiming 😉
Myself, I'm too sleepy now...

best,

Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
V:EKN National Coordinator for Brazil
--------------------------------------
Now a "luminary", whatever it means:
http://www.thelasombra.com/WhosWho/fabiomacedo.htm