Hi there,
Does anyone know if there’s any truth in the idea that a Z97 motherboard would be significantly better than a Z87 for running and overclocking an i7-4790K?
I'm planning an upgrade from my successfully de-lidded and overclocked 4760K, to a 4790K which I found at reasonable price and plan to delid and overclock also. However my mobo is now faulty and needs replacing..
I can replace it like-for-like or could upgrade to the Z97x-UD5H in the process. It would ordinarily be a no brainer, but the only currently available Z97 I’ve found will cost me £60 (50%) more than the Z87. I need to get the machine up and running again for work reasons, so have a bit of time pressure to move on this now either way.
I feel quite strongly that this extra cost for the Z97 isn’t worth it, and I’m 99% to go for the Z87. However, the vendor of the Z97 has said to me: “I think it's useless a 4790k with a z87 chipset”, and that the Z87 “is more limited for overclocking”.
Obviously he’s biased! But I still wonder if there’s any genuine truth in what he’s saying? If so, I might keep an eye out for a cheaper Z97 in future.
Final point here is I was just about to finally upgrade to Win10 from Win7 Ultimate. Yes, I know I should have done this before trying the CPU upgrade (this isn’t going very well!), but for some reason have been resisting the change! So another consideration is whether switching mobo to Z97 now will give me problems with windows when I restart, but I feel probably there’s a way I could overcome that if necessary and get back in.
All thoughts and advice most welcome!
Thanks!
Spec:
i5-4670K (delidded and overclocked to 4.2)
Z87x-UD5H, firmware F9 (broken, needs replacing)
Scythe Fuma 2 cpu cooler
Corsair RM750 PSU
4x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600
EVGA RTX 2060 XC Super
Samsung 840 Pro SSD
Win7 Ultimate (about to finally upgrade to Win10 before mobo broke!)
Does anyone know if there’s any truth in the idea that a Z97 motherboard would be significantly better than a Z87 for running and overclocking an i7-4790K?
I'm planning an upgrade from my successfully de-lidded and overclocked 4760K, to a 4790K which I found at reasonable price and plan to delid and overclock also. However my mobo is now faulty and needs replacing..
I can replace it like-for-like or could upgrade to the Z97x-UD5H in the process. It would ordinarily be a no brainer, but the only currently available Z97 I’ve found will cost me £60 (50%) more than the Z87. I need to get the machine up and running again for work reasons, so have a bit of time pressure to move on this now either way.
I feel quite strongly that this extra cost for the Z97 isn’t worth it, and I’m 99% to go for the Z87. However, the vendor of the Z97 has said to me: “I think it's useless a 4790k with a z87 chipset”, and that the Z87 “is more limited for overclocking”.
Obviously he’s biased! But I still wonder if there’s any genuine truth in what he’s saying? If so, I might keep an eye out for a cheaper Z97 in future.
Final point here is I was just about to finally upgrade to Win10 from Win7 Ultimate. Yes, I know I should have done this before trying the CPU upgrade (this isn’t going very well!), but for some reason have been resisting the change! So another consideration is whether switching mobo to Z97 now will give me problems with windows when I restart, but I feel probably there’s a way I could overcome that if necessary and get back in.
All thoughts and advice most welcome!
Thanks!
Spec:
i5-4670K (delidded and overclocked to 4.2)
Z87x-UD5H, firmware F9 (broken, needs replacing)
Scythe Fuma 2 cpu cooler
Corsair RM750 PSU
4x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600
EVGA RTX 2060 XC Super
Samsung 840 Pro SSD
Win7 Ultimate (about to finally upgrade to Win10 before mobo broke!)
Last edited: