Overclocking in windows

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

I'm looking to build a new system, and being the
overclocker I am, I want the most I can get for the least
I can pay. My question is this:

Based on yalls expirence whats the best overclocking chip
out there that will STABLY boot into windows? Right noy I
have a 2.4ghz P4C ocd to 3.2ghz equaling a 800mhz
overclock. Is there anything better out there right now
Intel or AMD?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 05:49:37 -0700, Charles Stella wrote:

> I'm looking to build a new system, and being the
> overclocker I am, I want the most I can get for the least
> I can pay. My question is this:
>
> Based on yalls expirence whats the best overclocking chip
> out there that will STABLY boot into windows? Right noy I
> have a 2.4ghz P4C ocd to 3.2ghz equaling a 800mhz
> overclock. Is there anything better out there right now
> Intel or AMD?

I'm not into overclocking so can't comment on that. Did want to mention:
When installing XP use default or moderate settings for the board. Once XP
is in, then do your tweaking.

--
Sharon F
MS-MVP ~ Windows XP Shell/User

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Try a water-cooled system. http://www.cluboverclocker.com/
The mobo is key as is cooling. Get 10,000 rpm drives.
Since you can buy a 3.4 GHz CPU and maybe OC to 4.2, be sure
the video is equally fast. Buy a fire extinguisher (CO2 is
cold and won't leave residue) because you may need it.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"Charles Stella" <Twakefieldmobile@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:753301c494d9$222ff980$a301280a@phx.gbl...
| I'm looking to build a new system, and being the
| overclocker I am, I want the most I can get for the least
| I can pay. My question is this:
|
| Based on yalls expirence whats the best overclocking chip
| out there that will STABLY boot into windows? Right noy I
| have a 2.4ghz P4C ocd to 3.2ghz equaling a 800mhz
| overclock. Is there anything better out there right now
| Intel or AMD?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Hello

Right your never going ot be happy, just run your pc as is
and be happy, no amount of speed in the world will make you
any happier.

Al


Charles Stella wrote:

> I'm looking to build a new system, and being the
> overclocker I am, I want the most I can get for the least
> I can pay. My question is this:
>
> Based on yalls expirence whats the best overclocking chip
> out there that will STABLY boot into windows? Right noy I
> have a 2.4ghz P4C ocd to 3.2ghz equaling a 800mhz
> overclock. Is there anything better out there right now
> Intel or AMD?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Very true, but there is the adrenaline rush that comes with
overclocking. Will it work, will it fry? Oooh, I can't wait

Anyways, here is my specs you might like. You really should head over
to overclocking websites and check their systems for ideas.

I have hit this on air cooled and was stable for a few hours (but
finally crashed after 5 hours of burnins).

ASUS P4P800 1.2 GHz FSB
Intel P4 2.6C @ 3.9 GHZ (have taken it to 4.2, but was unstable after a
half an hour of use due to heat)
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB flashed to ATI Radeon 9800XT 128MB (This
requires a R360 Core)
NEC ND2500A DVD Writer flashed to ND2510A (Still haven't tried DL Media
though everything else works perfectly)
SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS Platinum (Not overclocked)
Corsair PC3200 512 MB (2x256MB) on old BH5 chips at 2-2-2-6 OCed to 415
MHz

What is important is to get a MB that locks your AGP/PCI frequencies.
Those are some of the highest marks I have hit while still being
somewhat stable on my computer. I have backed it off a bit for normal
use since there is no point in sacrificing stability for performance on
this computer. Instead I am only running at 3.25 GHz (1 GHz FSB) and
400 MHz on the memory at 2-2-2-6.

AMD's OC well too. You may like this article:
http://www.winbeta.org/forums/index.php?s=fd14e3def5bf0b9fe33a2014e3f6e8a6&showtopic=2236&st=0&#entry21381

----
Nathan McNulty


Alvin Brown wrote:
> Hello
>
> Right your never going ot be happy, just run your pc as is
> and be happy, no amount of speed in the world will make you
> any happier.
>
> Al
>
>
> Charles Stella wrote:
>
>
>>I'm looking to build a new system, and being the
>>overclocker I am, I want the most I can get for the least
>>I can pay. My question is this:
>>
>>Based on yalls expirence whats the best overclocking chip
>>out there that will STABLY boot into windows? Right noy I
>>have a 2.4ghz P4C ocd to 3.2ghz equaling a 800mhz
>>overclock. Is there anything better out there right now
>>Intel or AMD?
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Charles Stella wrote:
> I'm looking to build a new system, and being the
> overclocker I am, I want the most I can get for the least
> I can pay. My question is this:
>
> Based on yalls expirence whats the best overclocking chip
> out there that will STABLY boot into windows? Right noy I
> have a 2.4ghz P4C ocd to 3.2ghz equaling a 800mhz
> overclock. Is there anything better out there right now
> Intel or AMD?

You won't do too much better than that unless you want to move to a P4 3.2
EE or 3.4 EE with 2MB of L3 cache, which will set you back ~ $1000USD.

The Socket 939 Athlon64 processors, especially the FX variety, are also
worth a look.

 

[Rick]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

S.Heenan wrote:
> Charles Stella wrote:
>
>>I'm looking to build a new system, and being the
>>overclocker I am, I want the most I can get for the least
>>I can pay. My question is this:
>>
>>Based on yalls expirence whats the best overclocking chip
>>out there that will STABLY boot into windows? Right noy I
>>have a 2.4ghz P4C ocd to 3.2ghz equaling a 800mhz
>>overclock. Is there anything better out there right now
>>Intel or AMD?
>
>
> You won't do too much better than that unless you want to move to a P4 3.2
> EE or 3.4 EE with 2MB of L3 cache, which will set you back ~ $1000USD.
>
> The Socket 939 Athlon64 processors, especially the FX variety, are also
> worth a look.
>
>
They are very spendy. I know I just bought one. It will cost close to
$900 (US).

Rick

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware (More info?)

Rick wrote:
>> The Socket 939 Athlon64 processors, especially the FX variety, are
>> also worth a look.
>>
>>
> They are very spendy. I know I just bought one. It will cost close
> to $900 (US).
>
> Rick


Very nice. Have you decided on a motherboard yet ?
The Asus and Abit Socket 939 boards look promising.
--
"I want to make it clear that DRM is perfectly ok with Linux!" -Linus