PSU reviewers have torn them down and they have all gotten a major thumbs up. I never said one would last longer than the other, though. I don't make assumptions like that. Can you think of any PSU in particular that was extremely highly praised by reviewers then just happened to end up being a big dud for a bunch of people after 3 or so years? If so I'd like to hear about that PSU.
And I never said the RMx was the better option than the G2. Strictly speaking, the RMx is a better PSU as tested in reviews which is why it usually costs a bit more. Albeit better by a small margin. So yeah the G2 could be the better option indeed and in this case would be, but it frustrates me when people think the RMx is going to be unreliable or something.
I never said you said anything. You asked me why I felt the way I felt and I told you.
The Corsair CX and CS series as well as the EVGA 500b, 600b, and NEX units are perfect examples of units that test well and general received good reviews, but end up being absolutely unreliable in the long(or short lol) run.
I'm sorry but I am a pessimist at heart and will not be quick to hold a CWT unit at such a high regard until I get some . I know CWT is capable of making some good units but they're usually either wear an Antec label or are overpriced.
And yes, I would trust an Antec CWT model more than a Corsair CWT model.
I have an opened mind though. The RMx seem like very solid units. I will be keeping my eye on them. The new CX models too.