Exactly. As we always say, a sample of one is no indicator of quality or probability. Due to the numbers of CX units that do NOT last when used in demanding configurations, you have to factor in the probability that a particular series won't last long in a given environment, not what it does on the test bench when brand new or what one user, who may or may not actually stress the unit for long periods of time under the same conditions that others will, sees their unit do or not do.
Yours has not failed, but it's also been only one year. So we change the tiering based on that? And when it DOES fail in six months from now, for a total of a year and a half of use, while other units are still chugging along after five to seven years of punishment, we change it back? I think not. It's great that yours has been a success for you, unfortunately that has not been the case for enough users that it became a concern and had to be addressed, which it was.