Exactly how is the lack of a service pack, MS trying to force people to upgrade? Vista got DX11 without the need for a service pack but instead through a platform update. MS announced prior to Vista's launch that service packs would no longer contain "new features"....
[citation][nom]john_4[/nom]They tried this crap with Vista, MS refused to allow XP to run DX 10, had to buy Vista.F off MS.[/citation]
WindowsXP didn't get DX10 because it would have required an update to the OS kernel itself as well as changes to how the OS handles hardware. Not something even Apple would ever attempt. DirectX10 required WDDM1.0....which WindowsXP does not support.
[citation][nom]amoralman[/nom]As long as they support Windows 7 for a while, I don't really care if it's a service pack or monthly downloads.The problem is when they decide to cut, render obsolete, a perfectly functioning software, just to have people pay for their new one.No wonder Windows is sooooo widely pirated. I'll certainly consider all my options when they throw my own purchased software in the garbage.[/citation]
Where exactly have they decided "to cut, render obsolete, a perfectly functioning software"??? They're not going to take the time to bundle all the updates they've released into a service pack. MS announced after the release of SP2 for XP that they would no longer include "new features" in service packs...instead, they'll be strictly a collection of previously released updates. So, what is the big deal?