Hi folks,
I'm looking to get a 500GB SSD and I'm choosing between Samsung EVO 860 vs ADATA SU800.
On paper (or screen!) the ADATA looks better...
ADATA SU800
--------------------
Storage: 512 GB
Read speed: 560 MB/s (up to)
Write speed: 520 MB/s (up to)
TBW: 400 TB
MTBF: 2M hours
Warranty: 3 years
Other: SLC caching, LDPC ECC Engine, RAID Engine, DEVSLP (device sleep/power mode)
Samsung EVO 860
--------------------------
Storage: 500 GB
Read speed: 550 MB/s (up to)
Write speed: 520 MB/s (up to)
TBW: 300 TB
MTBF: 1.5M hours
Warranty: 5 years
Other: AES 256-bit Full Disk Encryption, Intelligent TurboWrite Technology, 'Queued trim' (for enhanced Linux compatibility??),
What do you think is the best option? I know that Samsung is usually much more popular but when I look at the specs above I don't know why. (The Samsung SSD is currently cheaper on Amazon).
Any advice is much appreciated!
D
I'm looking to get a 500GB SSD and I'm choosing between Samsung EVO 860 vs ADATA SU800.
On paper (or screen!) the ADATA looks better...
ADATA SU800
--------------------
Storage: 512 GB
Read speed: 560 MB/s (up to)
Write speed: 520 MB/s (up to)
TBW: 400 TB
MTBF: 2M hours
Warranty: 3 years
Other: SLC caching, LDPC ECC Engine, RAID Engine, DEVSLP (device sleep/power mode)
Samsung EVO 860
--------------------------
Storage: 500 GB
Read speed: 550 MB/s (up to)
Write speed: 520 MB/s (up to)
TBW: 300 TB
MTBF: 1.5M hours
Warranty: 5 years
Other: AES 256-bit Full Disk Encryption, Intelligent TurboWrite Technology, 'Queued trim' (for enhanced Linux compatibility??),
What do you think is the best option? I know that Samsung is usually much more popular but when I look at the specs above I don't know why. (The Samsung SSD is currently cheaper on Amazon).
Any advice is much appreciated!
D