Samsung Unveils GSIII Complete with Own Version of Siri

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
[citation][nom]Halcyon[/nom]Nope, not IMO. ...and my eyes are fine. Really. If it is Super AMOLED with pen-tile it's not superior. Google that and you'll see why. Again, I don't think Samsung would mess up and use a pen-tile screen like Motorola did...but I'm just say'n.[/citation]

Actually pentile was only a problem if implemented badly like with droid razor. They used pentile pixel geometery but only used RGB pixels. The Galaxy nexus and I assume the GSIII use RGBG with extra green subpixel. Have you not even looked at the Nexus?
 
[citation][nom]getreal[/nom]...froth at the mouth through their retainers over it.[/citation]
Now...that was just funny. ...'cause I can kinda picture it.

Lol. I'm passionate about my tech too, I just try not to be as insulting as a lot of folks here like to be. Different strokes....
 
It could be a nice phone, I hope they left out the plastic case this go-round.

Why do I need a cold easily dented metal case on a phone that I will have at the most for only 2 years? Leave that to Apple. It needs to make locked-down caged-in, throw-away, easily broken phones to rob its faithful sheeple bare before they wake-up. And wakeup they will, cause you can't keep the human locust in slumber forever.
 
[citation][nom]skittle[/nom]Actually pentile was only a problem if implemented badly like with droid razor. They used pentile pixel geometery but only used RGB pixels. The Galaxy nexus and I assume the GSIII use RGBG with extra green subpixel. Have you not even looked at the Nexus?[/citation]
I have seen the Nexus and it indeed has a nice screen. If that's a pen-tile screen I stand very much corrected. The Razr's screen was a big disappointment to me.
 
[citation][nom]del35[/nom]Why do I need a cold easily dented metal case on a phone that I will have at the most for only 2 years? Leave that to Apple. It needs to make locked-down caged-in, throw-away, easily broken phones to rob its faithful sheeple bare before they wake-up. And wakeup they will, cause you can't keep the human locust in slumber forever.[/citation]
I keep my phone in a case. I just am not a fan of plastic for phone cases. To me metal seems higher-end than plastic. ...but I guess if implemented so the plastic doesn't look and feel flimsy and cheap it could be okay.
 
halcyon, have not examined it under microscope my self (would look funny taking microscope into the store 😱 ) but engadget says that it is so http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/galaxy-s-iii-microscope-hd-super-amoled/
 
[citation][nom]getreal[/nom]People do, and an overwhelmingly vast majority choose the iPhone over the equivalent samsteal![/citation]

I agree with you. Justin Beiber and Lady Gaga were the top sellers last year, so that makes them the best music artists, because it is all based on sales.

iPhone is still better than GIII because it has no micro USB, no expandable memory, and still no access to Flash (or Java, Shockwave, Unity, etc.) ... so that's 33% of websites that you still can't access.

Hey, I am just want to troll and make as much sense as getreal.
 
[citation][nom]skittle[/nom]sorry but it says right in apple specs: 960x640http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.htmlRetina might be nice compared to other smart phone screens,...[/citation]
It only manages to look half way decent at that mediocre resolution because of it's minuscule size. Few people seem to understand that. If the screen is small enough even a low res will look good.
 
[citation][nom]munnabhai[/nom]good designaverage specsover-hyped marketing looks like Samsung really wants to go Apple way..[/citation]
Samsung don't overcharge like Apple though.
 
[citation][nom]house70[/nom]It only manages to look half way decent at that mediocre resolution because of it's minuscule size. Few people seem to understand that. If the screen is small enough even a low res will look good.[/citation]

Yes exactly why i am unimpressed with current generation retina. it was good, but the competition have caught up and some have surpassed. Even my original galaxy nexus looks great next to retina. not as high dpi, but its contrast, viewing angle, and outdoor visibility are superb.
 
[citation][nom]getreal[/nom]I don't think I have been less impressed with a consumer electronic device since the Galaxy Nexus! Samsung is on a roll here! That's ok, Apple will hopefully sue over the Siri rip off, and then come to the rescue this fall with a REAL phone that actually innovates instead of blatantly steals![/citation]
Are you trying to be ironic for laughs or are you just clinically retarded?
 
I just picked up a Galaxy S2 about two months ago for $200 and coming from the G1 I'm very pleased with it, don't see a need for this new one but i will be keeping my eyes peeled for the next Galaxy S4. None the less this is a very nice phone. Being a picky phone buyer i like what Samsung has been coming out. As for the Isheep well, whatever floats your boat, just know Apple is rich but its a sinking ship and its about to take on heavy water soon =D
 
I keep my phone in a case. I just am not a fan of plastic for phone cases. To me metal seems higher-end than plastic. ...

Yeah, Apple is about "seems". I don't need a fat metal coffin of a phone like the iPhone 4s prison. Give me a slick phone with a large screen so that I can read ebooks, if I choose, without using a tablet, and whose back I can remove to easily replace its battery in case I travel hither and yon. Enough of this "seems". Apple is all about "seems" crap and no substance.

Get real. The iPhone 4s is an embarrassment to up to date technology and open standards, in particular. It is a phone suited for a dumbed down sheeple that hasn't done its homework and cant think for itself, and is as a result susceptible to advertisement and hype.
 
[citation][nom]skittle[/nom]Precisely, it is a free market so choose what you want. But why would you choose something with an inferior screen?Any LCD screen compared to Super AMOLED is inferior (rezound and retina both are lcd). There is just no comparison. Apples screen is nothing special except it has high dpi, though so do many other phones now like the rezound which is also 1280x720.Samsung has the best display, that's all there is to it. Super AMOLED is better than LCD. If you think otherwise, consider having your eyes examined.[/citation]

So by your logic, everyone should buy the new iPad and not even consider an android tablet!
 
[citation][nom]getreal[/nom]So by your logic, everyone should buy the new iPad and not even consider an android tablet![/citation]

No. Exactly the opposite, ipad screen is not all that great either. just a larger LCD panel.
 
[citation][nom]skittle[/nom]No. Exactly the opposite, ipad screen is not all that great either. just a larger LCD panel.[/citation]

Sorry, but weren't you using the exact same argument as to why the samsuck products are better? You know, higher display larger screen, etc?

I've seen a lot of delusional people on here, but I think you may have just topped them all with that comment.
 
Apple markets their products. ...but I don't see a lot of marketing from their competitors...more word-of-mouth (nothing wrong with that). However, since Apple does market their products they reach a lot of consumers. When they put out an ad that says their product is "revolutionary" and the competition simply doesn't put out any ads....

I like Apple design but theirs are not the only designs I like. I like Sony design as well...but Apple and Sony charge a hefty premium for their designs. A premium that many of you feel is grossly unwarranted, especially when you dislike the designs they're charging a premium for.

I think some competitors would do well to market their products more, as Apple has done.
 
[citation][nom]Halcyon[/nom]Apple markets their products. ...but I don't see a lot of marketing from their competitors...more word-of-mouth (nothing wrong with that). However, since Apple does market their products they reach a lot of consumers. When they put out an ad that says their product is "revolutionary" and the competition simply doesn't put out any ads.... I like Apple design but theirs are not the only designs I like. I like Sony design as well...but Apple and Sony charge a hefty premium for their designs. A premium that many of you feel is grossly unwarranted, especially when you dislike the designs they're charging a premium for. I think some competitors would do well to market their products more, as Apple has done.[/citation]
apple puts its funding in creative advertisement thats reaches the non techie crowd while the other especially samsung puts that funding in improving.
 
I'm disappointed! The hardware is impressive, but the box... the borders are too big. Its the same as S II, it just has rounded corners... i wish it was like that concept image, like borderless, it was great !
(and its pretty big...)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.