Soo- I'm getting 12hrs small FFT stable @ VCC 1.275v & 3.5hrs stable large FFT's in prime95 with the following:
VCC: 1.275 @ 53C
FSB: 1.3 @ 33C (wouldn't post at anything lower including my best attempts at fine tuning the GTLREF lanes from +60mV to +110mV in all 4)
DRAM: 2.0 @ {
tCAS 4
tRCD 4
tRP 4
tAS 12
CMD 1T
-
tRRD 3
tRC 22
tWR 5
tWTR 9
tREF 7.8uS
(5 passes, no errors in MemTest86+ 2.11) }
SPP: 1.55 @ 55C (again, won't run prime95 lower)
NF200: 1.3 (raising this from 1.20v seems to have fixed the errors on core 0 within 1 min, in prime95)
GTLREF: all @ +80mV
I know I'm getting Large FFT errors @ VCC 1.275 and a friend recommended 1.375, but doesn't 12hrs of small FFT's mean the CPU core voltage is stable and secure? I was thinking that either the NF200 voltage was too low or the GTLREF's are out of spec, to cause the fail on the large FFTs..
Appreciate the help and I will change and test the specs as you think best. I just think the lowered vcc means a huge drop in heat?
VCC: 1.275 @ 53C
FSB: 1.3 @ 33C (wouldn't post at anything lower including my best attempts at fine tuning the GTLREF lanes from +60mV to +110mV in all 4)
DRAM: 2.0 @ {
tCAS 4
tRCD 4
tRP 4
tAS 12
CMD 1T
-
tRRD 3
tRC 22
tWR 5
tWTR 9
tREF 7.8uS
(5 passes, no errors in MemTest86+ 2.11) }
SPP: 1.55 @ 55C (again, won't run prime95 lower)
NF200: 1.3 (raising this from 1.20v seems to have fixed the errors on core 0 within 1 min, in prime95)
GTLREF: all @ +80mV
I know I'm getting Large FFT errors @ VCC 1.275 and a friend recommended 1.375, but doesn't 12hrs of small FFT's mean the CPU core voltage is stable and secure? I was thinking that either the NF200 voltage was too low or the GTLREF's are out of spec, to cause the fail on the large FFTs..
Appreciate the help and I will change and test the specs as you think best. I just think the lowered vcc means a huge drop in heat?